I got on a serious subject tonight with a democratic socialist. They are a reformist and wanna protect the system and status quo, viewing those who would upset or destroy the either as a terrorist; which says what they think of me. I know they hate how I advocate online, and have tried to insult me by calling me a Stalinist. They didn't succeed until they started trying to conflate communism with both fascism and Libertarianism. Libertarianism is not an authoritarian ideology, it is the polar opposite of both communism and fascism, depending on if it's left or right libertarian; and fascism is the polar opposite of communism. That's besides the point but it their statement tonight goes into our irreconcilable differences over principles.
I'm an ultra democratic centralist, an eco-internationalist communist, inspired by Marxist-Leninist principles and teachings from Mao, Stalin, Engels, Lenin, Marx, Hoxha, and Guevara, indigenous collectivism and stewardship, and secular humanism, I align with the Communist Manifesto’s radical call for the proletariat to overthrow oppressive systems through revolutionary force, including the "dictatorship of the proletariat" to crush counter-revolutionary resistance and anti-communist opposition. My unwavering commitment to humanity and the planet above all else is guided by seven uncompromising principles. These principles, have been deemed “too extreme” even for Mao and Stalin by some in communist circles, reflect my belief that proportional force, from civil unrest to revolution to beyond, may be necessary to protect humanity and the planet from existential threats like capitalist exploitation, religious oppression, or ecological collapse, as condoned by the Manifesto’s revolutionary ethos. It's not about endorsement, it's about doing what needs to be done. And I can tell you this, neurodivergents and neurotypicals often don't process information or see solutions the same way.
Comments
Post a Comment