Differences On The Ontological Description Of The Left

This started as a response to real-time exchanges but my factual-philosophical mercurial neurodivergent communication style evolved into a structured contrast, turning it into this blog. It's a venture session from experience mixed with philosophical-ideological views and some facts.

Over the past few years I have been told by a Dem Voting Acquaintance that they could get along with all on the left, except: extreme, ultra, violent, anarchist, authoritarian, and those who wished to seize private property. Yet, they claim to seek bipartisan but have shown, they seek it only from the right as their support for third parties and independents includes calling them delusional, telling them they can't win, to sacrifice policies and principles, and to surrender themselves to the democratic party, where all that matters is stopping the next republican evil; and condemning those who want a candidate that supports their ideology in any way, as seeking a perfect candidate instead of prioritizing winning and staying comfortable without upsetting the republicans.

I'm a Democratic centralist with moral absolutism, a universal anti-sectarian secular humanist, an Intl' communist tankie, a ML third party and independent candidate voter; I am earthling and condemn the dark triad recognizing vices and virtues for what they are, I'm about proportional activity, doing what needs to be done. I'm not a constitutional identity politic equalist, I'm not a passive US exceptionalist, I'm not a patriotic Democratic Socialist, I'm not a Democratic Party and establishment candidate voter; I see no humans as illegal and don't tolerate the dark triad or allow vices and virtues to be conflated, I don't believe in systems or sectarian divisions, preventing humanity's and the planet's needs and blocking what needs to be done.

Ignoring what I am for and against, based on their exceptions, I doubt they get along with anyone on the left.

Democrats are no different than the Weimar SPD reformists, and in the same way the Germans fell in to the One Ring analogy concerning capitalism and fascism, Democrats have committed Boromir's folly; democrats are social fascist, they're right-wing from one end to the other. They range from right of center to far right, where they go from blue to purple; with some expressing desires for pre-victorian policies. Guess that's where the regressive slogan, "what can be, unburdened what has been," comes in. It's Social Fascism's Amnesiac Mantra, just like MAGA is Neo Fascism's Amnesiac Mantra; the American Uniparty shares the American Ideology, and it's not anywhere close to being left.

There is no compatibility between "The Left" and the "Democratic Party" or "Western Establishment Left." Even if they agree on a problem, they will their principles will cause fundamental differences over solutions and means. There cannot be alliance where solutions to problems and means of achieving those problems cross moral/ethical red lines. Let's be clear, on the world stage, the furthest left the Democratic Party is, is right of center.

It's fair to mention, this is also why the libertarian/Anarchist left quadrant and the Authoritarian/Communist left quadrant on the political compass map cannot form the unified front, and why there has been a long history of opposition between the two. And yes, this also explains the division and failure to form a unified front between " The Revisionist Left," and "The Anti-Revisionist Left."

The right can get stuff done because their main opposition is either controlled opposition or part of a uniparty with them, along with the right just caring about power and stopping the left, the right is social darwinists, they basically agree on policies, they just either want complete kratocracy or complete a avaritionism. The policies basically work the same, one half just seeks to eliminate the collective regulated individualism that the other imposes and defends; the libertarian half wants to be able to do that stuff without being told how to do it. The combination of all this is why "the Right" advances, while "the left" flounders.

Now, I expect the whataboutism from the right, including the democrats, and from the anti-authoritarian left quadrant because instead of acknowledging their differences and the truths here, they will come out in attack mode against what was said here.