One Of Four Political Quadrants Is Not Like The Others.

Out of the four political compass map quadrants, I don't get how everyone isn't anti a specific three of them:

Anti authoritarian right because they use state power to enforce hierarchical exploitation through nationalism, theocracy, or fascism that protects capital and suppresses workers rather than liberating humanity, with kratocracy representing pure might-makes-right government and fascism as capitalism in decay using state terror, ultranationalism, and scapegoating to preserve bourgeois property relations through mass mobilization of reactionary petit-bourgeois resentment.

Anti the right spectrum between authoritarian and libertarian because Spencerianism and social Darwinism naturalize exploitation by treating human suffering as evolutionary necessity rather than systemic injustice requiring collective abolition, explicitly embracing hierarchies as natural law, vices as virtues, and dark triad personalities as acceptable behavior. 

Anti libertarian right because their "freedom" is merely freedom for capital to exploit labor without restraint, allowing the bourgeoisie to operate unchecked while condemning the masses to precarity under false consciousness of individual liberty, with avaritionism as its purest expression of greed-driven exploitation. 

Anti Stirnerism and egoism because they exist between libertarian left and right, elevating individual desire above material conditions and collective liberation through spook-dismissing individualism that renders them incapable of organized resistance against capital's structural power, ultimately serving either capitalist exploitation or anarchist impotence depending on application.

Anti libertarian left because their rejection of democratic centralism and vanguard organization makes them incapable of achieving or defending revolution, with soulism's reality-denying voluntarism and Bookchinism's municipalist localism fragmenting revolutionary potential into reformist city councils incapable of withstanding coordinated bourgeois state repression, their anarchist idealism and egoist personalities failing to recognize that bourgeois power must be actively suppressed through disciplined proletarian authority, making them useful idiots who preserve capitalism by refusing the organizational structures necessary to dismantle it and defend against counterrevolution.

All three quadrants share one thing: rejection of democratic centralism. They'd rather preserve capital or render revolution impossible than accept that dismantling bourgeois power requires organized, disciplined suppression of class enemies. Everyone should be anti those three quadrants, but class and individual interests and ideological capture prevent it. And yes. Everyone fits into one of the four quadrants, anti the other three, even if they lean towards one. And the three quadrants discussed here, create and sustain oppression, exploitation, coercion, manipulation, and human rights violations, no matter how much those in those quadrants seek to project on to the parental/guardianship quadrant known as the authoritarian left, all because the three don't like equality, or both personal and social accountability and responsibility.

And for those who wanna condemn Stalin and his USSR:

http://yaunti3.blogspot.com/2025/09/countering-anti-communist-and-western.html