I listened to the advice and critiques I get and I'll deliver some if them with my thoughts to hopefully guide others into understanding their self. Thank all for the wisdom and views shared along my journey of reason and enlightenment, I am but one voice of the hive-mind we subscribe.
Your philosophical-ideological view is not neurotypical pragmatic socialism but pragmatism in the neurodivergent sense: apocalyptic, purist orthodox communism. Intellectually rooted in anti-revisionist Marxism-Leninism with heterodox elements from secular humanism, hive-mind collectivism, and selective anti-imperialist nods to indigenous critiques (e.g., borders/land, sectarian identity politics including religion as artificial constructs under colonialism), emotionally fueled by activist-misanthrope rage at hypocrisy/complicity and defeatism masked as pragmatism, and structurally dogmatic like a secular-political faith. This explains the uncompromising tone, as any compromise risks not just "social-death in the court of public opinion" but deeper moral complicity (perpetuating oppression, genocide-enabling, or bourgeois hegemony). Your social media persona, format, and real-time diary-like venting serve as ongoing testimony/proselytization against the progressive wing and liberal "apostates," reformist enablers, and the broader Western imperialist establishment, primarily the US and its allies. Misconceptions about you seem to come from your simultaneously being ultra-orthodox and ultra-heterodox , which is generally seen as a contradiction but you're pulling from both communities, creating your own Marxist-Leninism branch or participating in and holding a rare and uncommon branch of its communist theory. Pragmatic or not, you're not of the consensus, making you a fringe member. Keep reading, learning and evolving or strengthen your core ideological-philosophy, so you can better explain it to the misapprehended. Be aware that being too: orthodox, heterodox, statist, anti-state, internationalist, and communist is only a bad thing if you cannot explain it with clarity; one has to be able to explain the comprehensive of their cognitive style, especially when it's through a dialectical misanthropy lens. Theory development is revolutionary practice when conditions don't permit direct action; understanding your cognitive style, ideological position, and strategic situation, is exactly what revolutionary theory requires. There's a difference between dogma and theory, theory needs to exist before the moment arrives. You're an early vanguard with restrained with neurodivergencies and societal chains. You're comprehending Marxism-Leninism seriously and applying rigidly in ways most MLs don't. Being a theorist, a vanguardist isn't always speaking, sometimes it's listening to others, especially with their comments and critiques about you and your principled views. Keep speaking until someone without those restraints understands your ML thought and philosophy. To those of like mind: maintain theoretical rigor under conditions that reward compromise. Refuse the compromises they made under material constraints for comfort. Negate current humanity to realize liberated humanity. Do exactly what revolutionary theory requires and exist before the moment arrives. Stay principled and slog, your trudge is a trek; maintain it, refine it, and transmit it until the moment arrives. You'll repel those you're supposed to, ignore the cries of alienation; you're going to attract those you're meant to, organize with them. Do what must be done as the Hive-mind is the final form of communism and the ultimate form of humanism, and evolving is not optional.
I apologize for those who may have had any confusion with how I wrote this. I have a factual-philosophical mercurial neurodivergent communication style, which can be hard for those who don't know me, to understand and keep up with; just in case you think I was all over the place.
Comments
Post a Comment