The Left Does Not Start At The Democrats, Fascism Does.
I responded to a Democrat post in social media that started by saying it doesn't matter what the opinions of socialism, communism, and anarchism was, that we needed to stop the infighting. And then it ended by telling the left to abandon its ideological views and to surrender to the Democratic Party. Thinking we wouldn't recognize that their message was an attack, and not a call for a temporary alliance. The haughtyness deserves a true rebuttal, and I'm delivering one. Here's a Gibbs slap for their voters.
Then when we call out your sources for being corrupt, capitalist, western, or fascist, and your version of history for being whitewashed, redacted, revised, and romanticized, you say stuff like "well it came from archives and vaults..." but ignore the question of found and released by whom? And we don't ignore how you use Trotskyist propaganda, a liberal sympathizer, who was upset he wasn't given control after Lenin passed, nor do we ignore how every anarchist group was upset that the USSR, China and other countries didn't immediately dissolve the governments and leave those nations to be ravaged by the capitalist vultures. When we point out other sources and contradictions, they're always labeled state propaganda of western/US enemies or sympathizers to the accusations you make from the west, how convenient that the enemy to your ideology is the same as the enemy to your nation and its capitalist nation allies.
Just look at Canada's victims of Nazis monument, when actually fact checked, it was filled with Nazis, all because of the trusted sources they used. Every time your accusations are put under a magnifying glass or microscope, the same seems to happen.
Who voted bipartisanly with the GOP on H.R. Con 9 and H.R. 5349 under the 118th congress? That was Democrats going after ideological views that are both polar opposites and enemies of fascism. Who did the regime change in 2014 in Ukraine and who has backed the Azov since 2022 because the enemy is Russia? Russia who claimed to have gone to war to stop crimes against humanity, while their information against Ukraine is being investigated by the ICJ, while Ukraine's information against Russia was dismissed. Not to mention Biden and his buddy Womack sanctioning the ICC.
Clinton, Obama, and Biden all had control of the house and senate, and none of the problems they warn us about annually got codified. The argument of the trans teen in a blue state vs. a red state is only kept alive because of that. Same thing with voting for Dems because you didn't want fascist US foreign policy brought here. If Dems ended it while they had ability, it wouldn't be an annual election talking point. Y'all are negligible from Republicans.
Which is why we say Blue Exceptionalism is the same as Red Nationalism. There's a reason why Malcolm X called Democrats "foxes," who bankrolled and defended a genocide from October 2023 to January 2026, with some of its voters and politicians never stopping because it's their identity which they unmasked. But vote blue no matter who, right‽
Y'all love Dr. King. "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere," said MLK, making Democrats a threat to all, for genocide anywhere is a crime of all crimes, unless it's against the likes of fascists and Nazis, which are threats to all of humanity, and thus the exception. Russia is not fascist, nor does it have almost 1,000 military bases around the globe. The same is true for China and the rest of the BRICS nations the Dems fear, they are not on the level of fascism and never will be. All nations with laws are authoritarian, that doesn't make them the same as fascists, and dropping the US dollar to end American and NATO global terrorism doesn't equate to human rights violations. The U.S. on the other hand has had both the Dems and the GOP accused of fascism by its citizens for decades. And since 2016, it's taking a lot of smoke and mirror acrobatics to try and defend them, which is seen through...
Democrats are capitalist, capitalism requires exploitation, oppression, violations, coercion, manipulation, and extortion, those six things can never be removed from capitalism. The worker takes risks, they have no real protections if the business falls, yet they will never have equal say or compensation with the owner. The worker under capitalism will always be a wage-slave.
The left opposes exploitation, oppression, violations, coercion, manipulation, and extortion, which is why it says it starts at anti-capitalism. This means the fighting with the Democrat, or even Labour (UK), and Liberal (Canada) parties, is not infighting, it's the left fighting with the right. Progressives, Social Democrats, and modern Democratic Socialists may use socialist/anti-capitalist rhetoric but they are neither, and in the end, just like Biden ending the rail and dock worker strike, or Thatcher's attack on miners, capitalist parties will always see the workers as the enemy within, making them the social and liberal fascists the Third International warned the world about. The Labour, Liberal, and Democratic Parties are negligible from the Tory, Conservative, and Republican Parties. And I assume the non American parties are as big of cults as the American ones.
Check out these four blogs, and then the one at the very end of this blog:
Also for the lesser evil voters out there, I recently came across Eric Beerbohm's theory on voter ethics. I had an understanding but I wanted to make sure it was universal or close to it, so I fed it to an AI and asked for a summary. Read what the AI said, because it is heavily directed at y'all...
What many refer to as the "lesser evil" defense, the left calls tribalism of the establishment. You have a duty, and many of you aren't voting "lesser evil"; you're voting "most comfortable," and that is even worse because it says you're cool with crossing red lines as long as it doesn't affect you, which is a pure dark triad trait.
Comments
Post a Comment