This Intuitive Left Xennial Has Two Questions and A Thought.

I want to make clear my cognitive communication and learning style isn't limited to politics, it's applied to everything because it's who I am.

If you know information but don't understand it, you're an actor.  If you know information but can't site sources or show your work, you're not credible. If you act but don't know information your reckless, and if you don't know anything and don't act, you're wilfully incompetent. All four groups are a liabilities. The question is, which ones can you tolerate to walk among you? That is the question for the left, for the non-mainstream parties, for the movements, and for those trying to build big tent coalition parties. Sit with that. Now there is also the opportunists, you know the opposition infiltrators, and the grifters, and I don't wanna walk among them but as long as they don't have seven figures, many among us accept the opportunists because they're also wage slaves,  regardless of their intent and character. Have people not heard of guilty by association or transformation due to tolerance? Many of those people are welcoming were apathetic to crimes against humanity and walked across our red lines.

Give me the TL;DR because ain't nobody got time for that!

I have a factual-philosophical mercurial neurodivergent communication and cognitive style. I'm a high compression cognitive style learner. When I consume information, when I "read the book," I filter for the point: the what, how, and why. It gets distilled by relevance, then utility, everything else gets discarded. The who, when, and where are filler. I ask one question: will I need and use this? If not, I take the sentence-level insight and move on. That produces a lot of in-one-ear-out-the-other material, but hoarding useless information isn't learning. Honestly, 99% of what people call valuable context, I don't care about, all I want is the TL;DR. I'm good at finding the pattern but my information retain and recall is weak. I'm a logical high-density one-pager with efficient epistemology: precision over padding, simplicity over redundancy. I'm tired of white elephants. I've forgotten more important things chasing irrelevant ones per request than I'd like to admit. Memorizing isn't learning, it's storing. We differ in: I know things I can't defend and look uncredible, while others can defend things they don't understand and look unintelligent. I learn to understand and know, most learn so to appear intellectually superior and hold it haughtily over others; who's the greater liability, which would you rather align with? Remember, performance is theater, and comes with bad actors, degrees don't make intelligence, they make storage. A comrade once told me all I need is to know the main points unless I plan on teaching or leading. I consider myself epistemological, independent vanguard, a Sir Dagonet equivalent, a gamma-sigma hybrid mentality, i have this unconscious competence but I walk my own path, and those who choose to follow me are not asked to, I accelerate sparks but others have to continue feeding their flame because if I can explain without notes, it won't be simply, it will he in circles... And I rarely debate because I'm conflict avoidant, and a keyboard warrior, not a manipulative, coercive, dark triad, kratocrat.

I am a Xennial, we're synthesizers, impatient, to the point, intuitive, the best and worst of generations X and Y, and usually but not always Stoic, high functioning, neurodivergent, cognitive minimalists, and functional essentialists.