April 2026 Original Thought Posted On Social Media

Louisiana's HB211 sounds a lot like what progressive dems were calling for here in western ny. Arresting homeless, putting them in camps, arresting them if caught outside camp without paperwork, and making them work to pay for the camp and resources provided. I really don't see the difference between what dem soc & soc dem Dem voters called for and what the GOP bill in Louisiana. - April 30, 2026

They didn't rely solely on elections, but anyone who says Marxist-Leninists, communists, revolutionaries don't vote or use other tools provided by the bourgeoisie is a reactionary. They are the reckless, impatient, irresponsible individuals that get movements shut down. Do be wrong, vanguard parties need to step up their leaflet, pamphlet, and organizational game, but that doesn't excuse the anti-voter from being a liability and endangerment to any movement.

"Even if only a fairly large minority of the industrial workers, and not "millions" and "legions", follow the lead of the Catholic clergy, and a similar minority of rural workers follow the landowners and kulaks (Grossbauern), it undoubtedly signifies that parliamentarianism in Germany has not yet politically outlived itself, that participation in parliamentary elections and in the struggle on the parliamentary rostrum is obligatory on the part of the revolutionary proletariat specifically for the purpose of educating the backward strata of its own class, and for the purpose of awakening and enlightening the undeveloped, downtrodden, and ignorant rural masses. Whilst you lack the strength to do away with bourgeois parliaments and every other type of reactionary institution, you must work within them because it is there that you will still find workers who are duped by the priests and stultified by the conditions of rural life; otherwise you risk turning into nothing but windbags." Lenin, "Left-Wing" Communism: an Infantile Disorder.

You should be playing chess, not British Bulldog! - April 28, 2026

I am not an activist who is content with thoughtless phrases. My family motto is "safe on the waves," but I have changed that because I have been told more than: Through blood and strife, remove the sword and chains; cast down gods and masters. Safe on the waves amidst chaos, beyond what is, to what should be, must be pushed. One people united, with the necessary care of people and planets, through us, the hive mind. - April 27, 2026

For the blue voters still pushing Operation Paperclip imperialism and Stalin/Soviet red scare propaganda, the US imported Nazis and called the people who defeated them the enemy. That's not a coincidence; that's policy. - April 26, 2026

I lost full respect for a lot of former Bernie bros who in 2024 said either they only cared about America or were apathetic to genocide, when they were told democrats crossed my moral red lines, and asked how the party hadn't crossed theirs. - April 26, 2026

The theater needs to stop, the terrorists need be brought to justice, their cultists treated, and their empire resolved. - April 26, 2026

Hezbollah, the Houthis, Mai-Mai, the Darfur Rebels, Captain Ibrahim Traoré and the AES, and Hamas are not the Azov. Stop trying to include a fascist group in with freedom fighters. The Azov and their government are not fighting for the sovereignty of their people; they are fighting for the right to violate their people, which is why their government has resorted to military conscription, enslaving a people that do not wish to defend their oppressors. Freedom fighters do not steal the sovereignty of their people in the name of defense. The fight for freedom is done willingly; it is never imposed on a free people. I don't care if the Azov enemy is Russia. I don't care if you're still indoctrinated with red scare cold war propaganda. Freedom fighters are never fascist mofokin' Nazis. Freedom fighters fight and resist fascists and Nazis. And they definitely don't vote for them because one is lesser evil. - April 23, 2026

Got told by a Dem-voting acquaintance (one I cannot cut off atm), who didn't like that a pro-Palestinian online activist said "it's not our right to decide if they have a two-state solution or not," and said "if it's not our right to decide, it's not our right to stop a genocide, but we do have a right to decide which countries to ally with and aid, and we choose Israel." Dem voters are fascist genociders by supporting that party. Those voters haven't changed since 2024; they would be continuing to support evil and genocide if this was a presidential year and their candidate supported it still. - April 23, 2026

Marx, Engels, and the theorists who followed them were unambiguous on resource management, responsibility, and accountability. Production, distribution, and use all carry obligation. Nowhere in the canon did they carve out an exemption for the working class. Nowhere did they say accountability applies only to wage masters. I am certain they said no such thing, and I am equally certain that pre-colonial collectivist societies would agree, the global south would view such exemptions as threats to their existence.

The refusal to vet or hold our own responsible is not solidarity. It is the same logic Rand Paul deployed when he declared Republicans do not investigate Republicans. It is the Vote Blue No Matter What logic Democrats deploy when we raise their candidates' records of crimes against humanity or open hostility to working class interests. That is capitalist logic. That is lumpenproletariat logic, and the lumpenproletariat are precisely the opportunists Marx, Engels, Lenin, and every serious communist theorist warned us about.

This is not gatekeeping. This is not purism. This is refusing to surrender our integrity to those who would exploit and manipulate the wage slave class. If you cannot see the distinction, you have already been compromised, and you are a liability to every worker you claim to stand with. You may speak the rhetoric, but you remain indoctrinated into dark triad individualist ideology. Whether your lean is Spencerian, Stirnerist, or fascist, that lean on the political compass is incompatible with our light triad communalist principles and values.

Label me an outcast all you want. Those pushing sectarian identities and demanding territorial control over the wage slave class have already exiled and blocked me for refusing to grant it to them. The irresponsible with resources exiling me changes nothing. It only continues to expose the capitalist-minded individualist opportunists walking among us, wearing our language while carrying their interests. All wage slaves are workers but not all workers are out for the best interests of the wage slave class. Vet entry to your big tents, and learn something from the genocide in the middle east. Just because a people were greatly wronged and deserved compensation, doesn’t mean they are incapable of reproducing the values of their oppressors. - April 22, 2026

If you’re anti‑socialism or anti‑communism, don’t follow me. I have zero tolerance for or interest in associating with Fascists, Spencerarians, Stirnerists, capitalists, or anyone emitting dark‑triad, dark‑core ideological worldviews; your follow will be removed. - April 22, 2026

So what happens if you post that democrats are a center right party, and the politicians and members start at right of center social fascists pushing moderate fascism all the way to those in the party pushing a fusion fascism, while the gop is pushing neo fascism? Do you lose or gain followers for calling out the corporate uniparty and its two fascist cult divisions? - April 21, 2026

I'm an activist misanthrope and a secular humanist. I care about people, I don't care about people's history and I won't fall into that reactionary trap. I don't need to know the history of enslaved people to know their enslavement is wrong. I care about whether they are getting wronged and what's needed to put an end to that. I also care about having the proper facts, data, and knowing the point. This as a 3rd era Cominternist gets me accused of being wrong for not knowing the history of a people before offering assistance, and of being wrong for wanting to have the correct info while helping. There are many sides, and I condemn and praise where I see fit, but I also rank sides by severity or agreement. This too gets me called wrong. I don't know how to deal with those communists and I don't know how to deal with anti-communists. It's a no-win situation. So I just do me, because the alternative is I do nothing. And I refuse to give into the liberal discourse and call it revolutionary. My light triad personality came with a Kantian like morality, a deontological like duty, and a communist sense of justice. That's who I am, and should be who we, the communist movement are. Someone once said communism was the humanist religion and for me it is a secular political philosophical religion, which i am rigid and immoderately-inordinate in noting. - April 20, 2026

Yes, them, the progressive democrat wing and their voters are radical. Radical wage slaves that seek fluffy shackles and padded chains like on the Nordic Wage Master Plantations and in their Sweat Shops. The progressive wing's job is to radicalize (indoctrinate) you into staying in the blue maga cult, instead of seeking liberation with independents and third parties and voting for your best interests. You could've voted Claudia De La Cruz, Joseph Kishore, or Jasmine Sherman In '24. Democrats are enablers like the SPD was in the 1920s and 1930s. Revive the Comintern's Social Fascist label for fascist parties like them. - April 20, 2026

Always trying to gloss over their candidates and party. A Dem voter actually asked me in '24, if not voting for their potentially fascist dictatoral party was worth letting a potentially fascist dictator win the white house. Some how they justified that question in their head. Idc if it's the blue or the red, I'm never voting for the MAGA uniparty again. Only fascists, supremacists, and indoctrinated cultists do. - April 20, 2026

It's not too much to ask for people to give us a TL;DR: bluf, executive summary, conceptual bluf summary, conceptual summary, conceptual abstract, reading brief, abridgement, compendium, potted version, or whatever you want to call it. Just give us a leaflet, page, paragraph, tweet, or headline. Just give us the goddamn point without the irrelevant fluff and filler. For time is a precious resource for wage slaves, and those sharing or requiring information are being irresponsible with it. - April 20, 2026

To my blue and red maga acquaintances, 'Let people be' ends where your laws, policies, and regulations begin. You already chose a side, people will resist and label you dictatorial for imposing them. You don't have a monopoly on defining dictatorships. That is politics. - April 20, 2026

Never vote to be complicit with injustice. Never cross moral redlines to vote for the genocidal or the genocide enablers. Never vote Dem or GOP again. You want minority women, vote for Claudia De la Cruz and Karina Garcia if she takes the VP nom again. - April 20, 2026

Coworker knows my ideology and has made their opinion clear about third parties. They vented earlier and rhetorically asked what they are supposed to do. They have resigned to the current conditions, and oppose revolutionary action and third party organizing.

Those who march beside us but will defend the system when it is time to act are not on the side of our class, and will defend both the ruling class and the wage masters, physically or with policy.

How would our theorists have us handle those like my coworker, the petty-bourgeois sympathizer in proletarian clothing, people whose material aspirations and ideological commitments are currently aligned against working-class politics? I would think it be a bit more than neutralizing them but I don't know, maybe demarcation? And too many in our movements would take them because they only care about numbers, and are willing to sacrifice principles. - April 19, 2026

I am an internationalist, and every time I hear one of my fellow Americans complain about America losing its place, about America falling, about America's reputation getting ruined, I think about just how much better that is for humanity.

The United States maintains a vastly larger global military footprint than BRICS nations combined, operating approximately 750 to 800 overseas bases and installations across more than 80 countries, dwarfing the collective total from BRICS members: Russia's roughly 20 to 30 facilities (mostly in former Soviet states and Syria), China's 1 to 3 (primarily Djibouti with limited access elsewhere), India's handful of small listening posts or access agreements, and negligible or zero permanent overseas bases from Brazil, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and the UAE.

On sanctions, the US imposes far more on other nations than BRICS countries do collectively, with active programs targeting dozens of countries and entities (including comprehensive regimes against Cuba, Iran, North Korea, and Russia) that affect 60% of low-income nations and involve thousands of designations, three times as many as any other single actor, while BRICS sanctions remain limited, targeted, and far smaller in scope (e.g., Russia's responses to Western measures or China's occasional trade restrictions).

In terms of military actions, the US has conducted 251 interventions abroad since 1991 (and 469 since 1798), including major wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, operations in Libya, Syria, and ongoing support in multiple theaters, exceeding BRICS combined efforts such as Russia's invasion of Ukraine and involvement in Syria, with minimal kinetic actions from the others.

Finally, the US has a far more extensive record of government interference and regime change attempts, with at least 64 covert and 6 overt operations during the Cold War alone, plus 81 documented election interferences from 1946 to 2000 and numerous post-Cold War actions (e.g., in Iran 1953, Guatemala 1954, Chile 1973, and more recent cases), compared to far fewer from BRICS, primarily Russia's limited efforts in neighboring states and election meddling (second to the US but at roughly half the scale), with China and others engaging mostly in influence rather than direct overthrows.

While exact counts of genocides are inherently subjective, contested under the strict intent requirement of the UN Genocide Convention, and lack post-1948 international court convictions for either side in new cases, a comprehensive review of accusations against the US during its numerous interventions reveals frequent war crimes and atrocity claims across conflicts in Asia and the Middle East but rarely results in formal genocide designations beyond the Native American case. BRICS accountability centers on two prominent direct or ongoing actions by Russia and China, with the US record showing broader indirect links through alliances yet fewer outright genocidal labels in modern wars. This framing, however, understates the structural dimension: the US does not need to administer genocide directly when it can fund, arm, and diplomatically shield client states that do, as the record in Gaza, Yemen, Indonesia in 1965, and East Timor makes plain. Indirect genocide, laundered through proxies and vetoes, is still genocide in its consequences even when it evades the Convention's intent threshold.

Consider BRICS a threat to humanity if you want but In threat level every category listed, the US surpasses BRICS combined by wide margins, reflecting its unmatched post-WWII projection of power versus the more regionally focused and less coordinated activities of individual BRICS states. The US and its allies, mainly Israel and NATO, are global terrorists, and the biggest threats to humanity. And my fellow citizens that complain, all vote for either the Democrats or Republicans, two cult parties guilty of America's crimes, making their voters complicit at the very least. The parties and their voters need Nuremberg trials, so that they can be held accountable to the world.

Seems like every shift I hear it. Then I go around acquaintances, and might hear it. Blue Exceptionalism is nor different than Red Nationalism, both lead to imperialist cult fascism. - April 19, 2026

Democrat voters tend to fall into three groups: social fascist, liberal fascist, and crypto fascist. - April 18, 2026

All people are offended when their character is defamed. Those who claim they don't get offended, are lying or have some form of mental condition. Shame me if you want, my mind cannot be changed on this. - April 18, 2026

Okay dem voting acquaintances, you wanna talk about complicity for being quiet. Under Biden, your party failed to enact any policies to safeguard against Trump before or after the election. And y'all were quiet on the bankrolling of the Azov, the bankrolling of a genocide, the protection of a genocide, on both protesters and homeless people getting arrested, the breaking of strikes by Biden, East Palestine, the Nord Stream pipeline, and a few other things. I was already loud about what was going on in this country, I was loud when you were supporting neo-nazis and genocide. I was

loud when your party was throwing the presidential election in 2024. I was loud when you all were apathetic to our "fascist foreign policy" and displayed how much of a colonizer you were by saying you only cared about America. And right along the way since some time during the Biden Administration, I've called out the Democrats and their voters for being complicit in helping Trump and the GOP do everything they're doing up until this day, while calling Democrats hypocrites for everything they say about Republicans. Y'all wanted me not to be silent, well blue MAGA is red MAGA, two cult voting bases of two fascist divisions of a corporate uniparty. Oh , and by the way, im an internationalist, i don't give a f*** about the nation, becausel call four it to be dissolved into a global union or republic. I call for the ISR or WSR, so i don't care if it falls and burns. - April 18, 2026

My acquaintances pushed until I responded, tried calling me complicit for not joining them in crying over the fall of the American liberal democracy. The two fascist variant, neo-lockean liberal parties can piss off. I hope this message finally sinks in with them on my various social media accounts, where ever they may see it. - April 18, 2026

Real-time response because I was in a location where I couldn't respond how I wanted: Dem voters repeatedly saying "I told you so," that everything would be normal, the same as it was, and that anyone who disagreed would be a lunatic, is not the win you think it is.

Those who didn't vote for Harris or Trump chose not to commit a crime against humanity and not to violate human rights. Some didn't vote because they have resignation about the process. The rest of us voted for somebody who wasn't just going to keep things the way they were like a conservative cultist simply content voting blue, but who actually proposed change.

And you told us your thoughts on those who push for change: "They can't win." "That's delusional." "You have to vote for our blue party or the red party's going to win and they're going to change things for the worst, so we want to keep things comfortable for us." "So you need to vote blue for us so we can keep things the same." "So we can stay at brunch and not have to worry about doing anything but voting the next election." "Our only concern is keeping the Republicans from power because that's all we want to do, just keep voting and winning."

What we hear is: We don't actually care about making any change because we're comfortable. Sure, we claim we want to make things better, but the reality is we don't. That's why we keep voting for this party. As long as they beat the other party, we're good, we're comfortable, and we can talk about staying at brunch with nothing changing and things being "normal."

To those of you complaining about problems, you told us we needed to take a civics class because you were tired of hearing about how bad the economy was under Biden. The GDP was just so great, so high, that prices were so low. Penny candy was back for Christ's sake. Food? You could fill a shopping cart for $20 because food was so goddamn cheap under Biden.

And due process? Running beautifully. We were setting records on deportations because due process was fully intact. Court cases in and out, left and right, just a parade of due process. Those people were getting kicked out of the country because we were doing deportations the right way: due process first, then out. We told you how much we supported human rights right before we told you we were apathetic to genocide, or that nothing would change when you brought it up, or that we only cared about Americans when you raised it. But we care about human rights.

We told you how much we hate white supremacists and Nazis, but we made sure we were supporting a candidate who was arming the Azov Battalion. We told you we didn't care how many arms went to Azov because the enemy was Russia. We kept telling you about how China was going to attack Taiwan and how we had to get in there to stop it. We told you we were going to vote for "the most lethal fighting force," and we voted for a candidate who declared both Venezuela and Iran threats, with Iran being the greatest threat to America. But don't worry, our candidate was completely different from Trump.

We told you how Trump was owned by a foreign country, and that we didn't care what AIPAC was doing when you repeatedly told us they owned our candidates. We told you how Republicans were a cult while we made sure to bring up Obama every chance we got, even when he was irrelevant to the conversation, just to dunk on the right. We made sure to chant things like "vote blue no matter what" and "what can be unburdened by what has been." We supported a party that said to hell with the primaries, that changed laws and sued to get third parties off the ballot, and our attempt to show you that we support democracy was to insist you vote for our candidate and our candidate only. And we made sure to arrest the protesters and arrest the homeless and work bipartisanly with the GOP.

That is what we hear every time you say "I told you so."

Blue MAGA is a cult, a social fascist, moderate fascism cult. - April 15, 2026

The average American has a comprehension level of an 8 to 12 year old. 3/5s to 3/4s of Americans feel burnt out, with half of America claiming they have no spare time, and as high as 3/4s of Americans say they're living paycheck to paycheck. I'm sure there are exceptions but I'd wager, this is why people aren't actively pushing for shit beyond the mainstream party platforms or doing grassroots organizing. We are wage slaves, don't forget; and the only requirement from Bernie's group is vote, while others are resigned to this is how the system is, due to lived experience. If all the communist parties required was registering, and the belief in core principles, their numbers would be larger. The people are conditioned by not only the system but by how third parties handle recruitment... One can ask but shouldn't demand more from wage slaves who are exhausted from the labor society requires to merely survive. I am for requiring people to be vetted before joining, and think there should be levels, group A: who just believe in the principles and aren't gonna do more than vote, group B: those willing and able to organize and read, group C: the educated leadership. There's an old saying, "keep it simple stupid!" Third parties need to apply that logic.

I'm not talking about Opsec and persec...Asking people for dues as a requirement for joining the party is not trying to make sure that you don't get the wrong people. Demanding people get out into the streets, organize, and participate in party activities is not trying to vet to keep the wrong people out. Demanding wage slaves, people who openly admit they have no time, that they believe in your shit, but they have no time or energy to do anything but survive, read and participate in group activities is not vetting to keep the wrong people out. That's excluding willing people that actually support your side because they're not privileged enough to have the spare resources needed to do what you ask. They share your values and principles, start there. Offer them the material needed for educating themselves when they can. Let them know doors are open when they can participate in group activities. As long as your party requires shared values and principles, there's no excuse for not having layers comprised of the workers, the cadre, and the vanguard. And to the influencers pushing big tents, and not demanding shared principles, shame on you. Yeah, you're not pushing a big tent, you're pushing a house of cards. It may offer some support but failing to draw the line in the sand with principles, is as bad as you see anarchists for their mistakes. "Before we can unite, and in order that we may unite, we must first of all draw firm and definite lines of demarcation," said V.I. Lenin. - April 12, 2026

I cannot join a party that supports commodification of basic needs. Nor can join one who wishes to keep wage slavery around. I will vote for third party left parties but I will not join those that don't align with my principles. Also, don't criticize the CPUSA for telling people to join the Democratic Party, and then recommend the DSA who does the samé damn thing. Because that's exactly what they did when I left the Dems and turned to them in 2020 for help. I might not be able to tell revisionist from anti revisionist but I know what Î believe and support, and so do many others People don't wanna waste their time building up the next democratic party, deal with that party who doesn't support their přinciples, just to later have tc tear it down when our party actuålly comes åround. You can't pull parties left. - April 12, 2026

Stop telling me the Democrats are 45 years behind Republicans on the right. Neither has a problem with genocide, neither have a problem with bankrolling things evidence aligns with Merriam-Webster's definition of holocaust. Democrats have no problem with international neo-Nazis, while Republicans prefer the homegrown variety. Neither actually have a problem with ICE, just the other one controlling the apparatus. Both view people as illegal. Democrats just prefer the theatrics of immigration court so they can claim due process. While they might have some differences domestically to quell both wage slaves and the international community, they're basically side by side. "Oh, but Bernie..." Bernie, AOC, Mamdani and any other Democrat you name exist to maintain your Stockholm Syndrome, while dangling fuzzy handcuffs and padded chains, so you'll be willing to stay on your plantation, in your sweatshop, entombed in your mines and imprisoned in your cubicles. I don't know why I bother talking to people who vote Democrat or Republican, they're all cultists who need to snap out of it on their own. - April 11, 2026

If your idea is that people need to read/be educated on a subject to have the right mentality, what you're calling for is people's indoctrination. Just because one understands something doesn't mean they agree with it. People learn for better understanding, not to believe something. I'm not saying don't educate yourself and others; I'm saying understand what education is. I cannot explain this any simpler: don't assume education will override the morals, principles, and philosophical-ideological views of every individual, and don't set out with indoctrination as your goal. And before one comes at me with, "What do you do with people whose values are themselves the problem?" The answer is you refer to how Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Hoxha, Castro, HCM, and other communist leaders used proportional action to handled it. Even the Haudenosaunee expelled and occasionally put others to death when necessary. History provides the answers, but you can always ignore history and repeat it by doing what the Union did in the US with Confederates, or what the world did with Nazis after WWII, and let them integrate with society, so every so many decades, the problem continues to surface repetitively. Using knowledge of theory or anything else is a bad evaluation tool to determine morals, ethics, and principles, I'm just saying... Libertarian-minded can be irresponsible and naive, liberal-minded can be haughty and chauvinistic, conservatives can be ignorant and supremacist, and we communists can be sanctimonious and presumptuous. Boundaries and requirements are one thing, but we must be aware of this so as not to become them. - April 11, 2026

Coworkers and just people in general...

Pissed my coworker off when I said that children aren't obligated to take care of family, especially when they themselves are underage. That they could be asked but enforcement could cause the child to leave by either their own choice or by law.

Fuck outdated tribal/Elizabethan 17th century poor law bullshit... - April 11, 2026

There's more than one way to consume and process theory. Some do it inductively from observable positions backward to structural causes, rather than deductively from texts forward to conclusions. That's a legitimate method. Something Lenin was said to of did the same thing constantly with empirical political analysis. Some wanna know the point, the what, how, and why with only the necessary amount of extra information needed to make the point, a TL; DR summary. Provide people with those summaries with a source list, in case they need more information. Time, mental energy, and mental storage space are resources, and one aspect of communism is responsible resource management including consumption of things that are finite. A vanguard that does not understand this cannot properly recruit or educate the people. Some communists living in the first world fail to see how their environmental conditions has made them privileged compared to others in their region and nation. We're not saying be an ignorant and irresponsible libertarian or anarchist, we're saying teach people by the methods they learn. We're telling them to adapt and evolve; we need accurate distillation of theory and information, not a dumbing down with reductions that lose the diagnostic precision. Do what needs to be done, meet people where they're at, and bring consciousness to the masses. If anyone cannot tell by observing modern civilization, humanity currently needs materialist pedagogy; for pedagogical rigidity is itself a form of vanguard failure. Regardless if the vanguard views their theory as a philosophical-ideological secular religion. - April 10, 2026

I saw a communist saying men need to be men instead of leaving the pants for women. It's 2026, the outdated stereotypes should not be getting used or enforced onto anyone. Especially among communists. Times have changed, let me tell you. Communist women are no longer passive and timid, and communist men are no longer aggressive and confident. The roles from the early to mid 20th century are no longer enforced or acceptable for those who believe in an equitable-egalitarian culture and society. - April 7, 2026

Any person claiming to be a socialist that supports and votes for mainstream establishment parties is a capitalist with plush handcuffs and padded chains, they push defeatism, block the left, enable fascism, and call it lesser-evil harm reduction. They are right-wing and the Comintern had a name for them in 1920s, and not doing anything about them is what allowed the nazis to lack resistance. In the year 2026, we have learned from 2020, that uniting with them once again leads to the rise of fascism, when they win and open the doors and cupboards for fascists. Harm reduction doesn’t vote against socialism and communism while simultaneously being passive aggressive towards fascism and claiming they've a big tent with some of them, like the Cheneys. You vote mainstream for incremental reform, you get incremental surrender. - April 5, 2026

I have a problem with humanity, mainly with those who fall into three of the four political quadrants that house fascism, Stirnerism, and Spencerianism. Those quadrants are primarily right wing but have some left libertarian quadrant occupancy. Believing "morals and principles are not tied to right or wrong" is not a political position, that's the philosophical foundation of collaborationism. If morals have no connection to right and wrong then they have no content at all, they're just preferences, and preferences can always be negotiated. Which means there is no floor. There is no line. Everything is always potentially on the table given the right circumstances and the right pressure. That's exactly what a system needs its subjects to believe in order to keep them manageable, and I do not believe it takes a system to hold this premise but I do believe it takes a system to maintain it. When they can't defeat the diagnosis they pathologize the patient for taking it seriously. People wanna know how I can be both a secular humanist pushing light triad views and an activist-misanthrope, having to deal with this mentality from society, this is how... It's philosophical, psychological, and dialectical materialism of my environment, lived experience, and neurological development. And before anyone comes at me with Münchhausen Trilemma, moral intuition is the axiomatic floor, filtered accumulated species experience encoded into conscience across every economic system humanity has ever produced. Class position determines how clearly that conscience reads, which is why liberation tends to be felt before it's theorized by those experiencing oppression and rationalized away by those benefiting from it. The floor is materialist, but the conscience layer beneath it is trans-systemic, it is real regardless of origin. And everyone has an axiomatic floor, the question is which way does their compass point. I don't think my rant from venting can be said any simpler. It's not about ignorance, it's about damn will. - April 4, 2026

The Vanguard are the equivalent of parents, guardians, elders. They are not permanent leaders but it is their duty to help guide everyone and keep everyone on the correct path of responsibility, accountability, and principles. The vanguard are not merely stewarding like the rest of us, they also are shepherds guiding the way. In what world are the current mainstream systems better than a new one under a vanguard? - April 1, 2026

Integrity is everything, Don't tell people to be illogical, irrational, unwise, uneducated, immoral, unethical, unrefined, uncivil, unprincipled, unscrupulous, interpersonal, noncomforming, unbound, boundaryless, uncontrolled, chaotic, overstepping, Intrusive and Invasive to end whiteness, capitalism, and colonialism. If we don't act like we have character now, we're not gonna have it after we abolish it. Like really fucking think, you ask so many to be unk becoming of what you expect now, they're not gonna correct that once the conditions becomes what you want. All you're doing is opening the door to new problems. People out here sounding like the left coms Lenin opposed or the Anarchists every Communist since Marx and Engels has opposed. JFC... Seriously... - April 1, 2026

The 'No Kings Protests,' Held on a Saturday, planned w/ police (the gov), didn't cause any discomfort or interruption to society, lasted for a few hours, then dissipated, where everyone went back to being a wage slave. The record broken was to show how many would comply w/ the gov's wishes, so that the gov could ignore you. That wasn't doing the right thing, that was literally theater for everyone who didn't get organized into 3rd party grassroots orgs. - April 1, 2026