March 2026 Original Thought Posted On Social Media
March 1st, 2026
Dem voting acquaintances keep asking me why I refuse to or demand I vote Democrat. And I read those I follow telling Democrats they have 2 years to give them a candidate worth voting for. This is for both of these groups.
Never cross moral red lines and never align with those complicit in enabling others to cross them. Never again will I vote Democrat and here's a sample of why:
Strike one: Betraying me by getting me to vote against my interest for 20 years.
Strike two: Making it appear like Biden was a lesser evil and not an equal to Trump, so I would vote for him in 2020.
Strike three: Giving me reason to go back and compare the Democrats to Britt's and eventually Eco's points and characteristics of fascism, to expose that Dems are somewhere between moderate fascist and neo-fascist.
Strike four: Bankrolling, supporting, defending, and arresting opposition to the crime of all crimes, genocide.
Strike five: Ending the rail and dock worker strikes.
Strike six: Democrats using the National Guard as police in blue states like NY.
Strike seven: Democrat governors and mayors arresting homeless people for being homeless.
Strike eight: Dems voting bipartisanly on H.R. Con. 9 and H.R. 5349 under the 118th Congress.
Strike nine: How the organization went out of their way to do everything to cost Mamdani the mayorship of NYC.
Strike ten: The number of Democrats on the Epstein list.
And their voters aren't any better:
Strike one: Stayed with them when I pointed out the betrayal.
Strike two: Admitting to being apathetic to genocide.
Strike three: Admitting they only care about America and Americans.
Strike four: Telling me America has a fascist foreign policy, that's why they're voting Democrat because they don't want it brought home, and aren't voting third party because they don't want to risk being made uncomfortable.
Strike five: Asking if not voting for a potentially fascist, dictatorial party was worth letting a potential fascist dictator get elected, just to show integrity to my principles.
Strike six: Telling us you're staying home instead of protesting because Harris lost and you're not at brunch anymore.
Strike seven: The sheer number of "I told you so's" because we refused to vote for blue genocide.
Strike eight: Their haughty attitude, calling everyone who didn't vote Democrat delusional, stupid, or cultist.
Strike nine: They can't stop bringing up Obama, they justify or use whataboutism towards everything the Dems have done wrong, chant "vote blue no matter what" and believe it, and admit to having to vote blue as long as the Republican Party exists.
Strike ten: Not only did they vote for a party bankrolling, supporting, defending, and arresting protesters of a genocide, they still support and advocate for them, knowing that the majority of Dems take money from and obsessively serve AIPAC and Israel, and are all throughout the Epstein list.
Call me a purist, a gatekeeper, or a deontological Kantian commie, I don't care. I don't side with supporters of genocide, fascism, terrorism, pedophilia, cults, or wage slavery. We are what we tolerate, guilty by association, so Dem voters, are you a genocider, fascist, terrorist, pedophile, cultist, wage master, or all of the above? Because that's what it means to be a Democrat voter and supporter in the 21st century.
And before you ask who you're supposed to vote for, in 2024, the Greens, PSL, Libertarian, and American Solidarity parties combining their write-in and ballot access all had a mathematical shot at 270. Be willing to be uncomfortable, be willing to lose, stop voting in complicity with injustice, find a third party or independent candidate you like and vote for them. Do what Eric Beerbohm's voter ethics theory said and stop being a defeatist by voting lesser-evil. Hell, his theory even implies it's better to abstain and/or revolt than vote for injustice, if that's all you believe your options are. There's no excuse to vote uniparty in 2026 or beyond; blue exceptionalism is red nationalism, both are MAGA.
MAGA is about returning to and re-enacting policies of previous times in US history. "What can be, unburdened by what has been" means the present and future can be freed by returning to and re-enacting policies of the past. Different theater, same script. If you're voting Democrat, you're voting center right to right of center; there are no Democrats on the left. And for the record, the left starts at anti-capitalism because the left opposes exploitation, oppression, violation, coercion, manipulation, and extortion, all things capitalism requires to exist in any form. Every worker is a wage slave and every employer and landlord is a wage master.
March 2, 2026
Where is the agitation literature from the various vanguard parties for workers drowning in rent, medical debt, 60-hour work weeks, and bare cupboards? Theory alone isn't cutting it, wage slaves need proper agitational sequencing; where are the pamplets and leaflets Lenin spoke of?
March 2, 2026
Theory is not the problem; the fluff, filler, and redundancy are the problem. The average wage slave does not care about and will not use the history and economic lessons throughout theory's pages. People should read it, but understand: once it becomes repetitive book after book, pamphlet after pamphlet, people are going to stop engaging with it. It needs to start with a summary point, and if people want to read more after it, provide the full text.
I haven't read theory since I finished the 52nd text. I don't need more economics or history lessons that i'm not or rarely gonna use. Nobody cares about foreign history in America. So giving people such a lesson to make a point is useless. People wanna know the what, how, & why; people wanna know the point & only the details needed to explain it. People don't want nor need to know the history of farming to know slavery is bad. We don't need several economics lessons to know wage slavery is bad.
March 2, 2026
Across ML, anarchist, libertarian socialist, and syndicalist lines, genuine disagreement exists on the state, on vanguardism, on organization, on post-revolutionary structure. That's real and irreconcilable in places. But there is some near universal agreement. Liberals are Center right. Capitalism are right-wing. The progressive wing of bourgeois parties are right of center. That's the actual floor, and when we acrually organize see the 'red corner Montana' 1929, plus the white & black panthers.
March 2, 2026
If you're a person on the left and you're cool with millionaires as long as they don't become billionaires, you're part of the problem. Neither should exist because wealth hoarding should be abolished. No form of capitalism can exist without wage slavery because capitalism requires exploitation, oppression, violation, coercion, manipulation, and extortion to function. This is a core principle of the left, and Soc Dems, Dem Socs, and performative progressives are right of center.
March 3rd, 2026
Our opposition to MAGA is not the same. You hate MAGA, but MAGA to you is just a faction of the GOP. When I say I hate MAGA, I mean the entire GOP, a.k.a. Red MAGA. And Blue MAGA, known as the Democrats. Yellow MAGA, also referred to as Libertarians. And although I have no issues with the eco-anti-capitalist socialists, I also take issue with Green MAGA, which is the capitalist or capitalist reformers in the Green Party. I hate Purple MAGA, those who don't know if they're Red or Blue; I hate MAGA Communism and any other MAGA color of the rainbow. So no, we both don't hate the fascist MAGA cults; you only hate a rival MAGA division, big f'n difference.
March 3rd, 2026
My communist synopsis for new followers...
My communication and cognitive style is factual-philosophical, mercurial, and neurodivergent. My communism is international, orthodox, heterodox, syncretic, and in some areas immoderate, with secular humanist, anti-sectarian, and indigenous tones. My democratic centralism and anti-sectarianism are ultra in the collective oneness sense, shared obligatory stewardship, and enforcement of democratic decisions, taking all three to the extreme. And my principles are basically an antitheist secular political Confucianist-like religion or moral-coded philosophy, grounded in dialectical materialism, that philosophically evolves epistemically with knowledge and discovery, with Kantian-like morality, deontological duty, and light triad personality. I am the entire ML tree, not just a branch, and my ideological roots absorb and assimilate what makes sense to me. If it makes you uncomfortable, so be it; activist misanthropy means we don't have to like each other for me to want better for you and yours. My synthesis isn't utopian; it's living in the present with a tankie willingness to do what must be done for the future that could be. Ally, frenemy, or enemy depends on our irreconcilable differences, and whether you compromise on your principles for unity. We are what we tolerate, guilty by association. Which is why a unified front isn't possible with all wage slaves; characterological or epistemic false consciousness is harmful for the collective, and I can admit that truth. Capitalism got people to turn vices, sins, arishadvargas, and mahapatakas into virtues and values, while simultaneously pushing the dark triad as culture in every hemisphere; and I will not compromise on my principles or sacrifice my integrity to appease others. A tent full of compromise on principle stands for nothing but power, and power corrupts without principled ethics. If that's what you're looking for, join the Democrats, Labour, Liberal, or whatever establishment left party your nation has; the compromised and power hungry big tent that sold out already exists.
March 3rd, 2026
I post real time responses, typically ones that i'm unable to say in person, and typically to acquaintances.
If your ideal of socialism is the Nordic model and your political heroes are Bernie Sanders, Andrew Yang, and the Squad, you are not a socialist. You are a social democratic capitalist. The Nordic model is a regulated capitalism with generous redistribution. It preserves private ownership, the employer-employee dynamic, the landlord class, and the profit motive. It reforms the outcomes of capitalism without touching the wage slavery structure that produces those outcomes.
Socialism by definition requires the abolition of capitalist property relations and worker control over the means of production. If you are not anti-capitalist, you are not a socialist. You are a humanitarian capitalist at best, which is a more honest and defensible position, but calling it socialism misrepresents both your actual position and what socialism means. Own what you actually believe instead of borrowing the language of a more radical tradition you don't fully embrace, just because the echo chamber or liberal cult latched onto it. A cult no different than what the Comintern of the Third International called enablers. If you are unfamiliar, look into that.
If you can explain how reform could make slavery acceptable for the slaves without them losing their slave status, then maybe you might be able to convince me on an argument for keeping capitalism, which is nothing but wage slavery. Nordic capitalism pacifies, it doesn't liberate. It doesn't set the slaves free. That is Bernie Sanders' socialism.
It is conservative bourgeois socialism and right of center. Why right of center, you might ask? Because the left starts and ends with being anti-exploitation, anti-oppression, anti-violation, anti-coercion, anti-manipulation, and anti-extortion. Capitalism requires all of those to exist, and with the wage master-slave dynamic, capitalism cannot exist without them. Thus, putting all capitalist ideological views on the right.
That is not bad faith. And before you argue that government intervention defines the left, consider that Nazis, fascists, and feudalists all intervened in favor of some and in opposition to others under their systems. Government intervention sits on the forward and backward social axis, not the left-right economic axis, regardless of whether it serves the wage master, the wage slave, or the homeless and disabled class of the hierarchy. The Popular Front destroyed protections and delayed the inevitable, which we are now dealing with, because the Comintern was criticized for condemning enablers.
March 3rd, 2026
Antitheist (anti religion/deities) + secular humanist (prioritize humanity because deities don't exist) = Anti-Sectarianism (anything that divides humanity must be abolished, or heavily regulated if it can't be). And those who try to steelman and say anti-sectarianism means uniting the left with nazis, is arguing in bad faith. If the priority is humanity then anti-sectarian would instantly be against those and those ideological views seeking to harm humanity. Which is why it doesn't apply to communism, regardless of what the egoistic and social darwinistic fascists, capitalists, stirnerists, kropotkinists and proudhonians say. You before I, we before me, concepts foreign to these individualistic who flee... Harmful individualism is not freedom but a sectarian excuse to violate folk for thyself, it must be handled. Collectivism is the idea that the fundamental unit of the human species that lives, thinks, and acts towards common goals is not the individual but some group. Collectivism is not limited in size and can include the entirety of the human species, and the collective acts as a superorganism, separate from individuals and individual groups, finding its strength in unity, not in individuality or sectarianism segmenting.
March 5, 2026
Dem Acquaintances, From telling me "our dollar is falling and weakeningbour national defense," to telling me that by "Trump abandoning agreements and alliances, that BRICS nations are stepping up and doing it." When you tell me "the US losing it's positions, is bad," what I hear is we're losing our ability to terrorize, coerce, and extort other nations without removing our fascist mask and resorting to Arms. And all the bad you come up with about BRICS, it's still better than US imperialism.
March 5, 2026
I'm tired of people asking me this: "Why are you always coming at the working class over morals and ethics, when you should be going after those in charge?" It sounds a lot like Democrats asking in bad faith why we're always going after them while Republicans hold positions in the capitalist system. Our movement is trying to repeal the current system, and if you don't have morals and ethics now, how do we know you're not just a broke member of the elite class waiting on your opportunity? A person's ideological orientation and behavioral patterns under scarcity reveal what they'd do with power. A lot of our online members are indistinguishable from the elite in their rhetoric and actions. Where is the vanguard that's supposed to be holding us accountable? Without it, we're just divided between fame seekers, high school cliques, and book clubs. Vanguard parties, the unified front you're building doesn't understand why they need morals or ethics. Where are the pamphlets, leaflets, and videos? This is why vetting, principles, and leadership matter. Rulelessness has infected us. Capitalism infected all of humanity with sins, vices, mahāpātakas, and arishadvarga; what are those in our ranks injecting without your theoretical guidance?
March 6, 2026
From some point in 2023 when primary season started, whenever my Dem voting acquaintances would try to get me to vote blue, I would call the parties a fascist uniparty. It got to the point, their recruiting pitch was "nothings gonna change with our fascist foreign policy, regardless of who gets elected, what matters is their difference in the US," and when I would bring up their rhetoric literally just used, they would say, "I only care about America/Americans." So when Harris speaks on War with Iran, realistically, not even their voters believe it. Both parties want absolute power, and both parties have cults concerned only with their own comfort. Two corporate divisions/coalitions/sects, one fascist uniparty; The Wolf and the Fox are a pack, sharing the neoliberal American Ideology in the 1950s (see Louis Hartz) and slowly it has evolved into a neofeudalist ideology (see Jodi Dean), acting as our lords and saviors.
March 6, 2026
For mixed capitalists across the globe:
You want to know one of the core ways the left proves the establishment left parties are right-wing? The left believes the state should be providing basic needs, meaning the state takes structural responsibility for guaranteeing them as a right, and removing them from market logic entirely. The establishment left pushes for incremental reforms, making them accessible, meaning the needs remain a commodity but barriers to purchasing them are reduced, subsidized, or regulated, keeping the capitalist framework intact while softening its edges. The rest of the right basically has zero issues openly denying basic needs under capitalism, as it's simply the system functioning as designed, where inability to pay excludes you from survival goods because profit, not human welfare, is the organizing principle. The distinction matters because accessibility is reformism that legitimizes the commodity form, provision challenges it, it's still extortion, and denial is the baseline the other two are measured against, because denial leads to the coercion that creates the wage and wageless servants and slaves. Reformist extortion over accessibility is still coercion. Mixed capitalist ideologies: Social Democrats, Social Capitalists, Liberals, and others are right-wing because no matter how much one tries to spin it, using extortion and coercion against others is violating others, and capitalism requires that. There's a reason why we don't say "I'm for mixed abuse relationships/parenting," so why does anyone think it's okay for a system to live under but not okay to exist in our homes? If you love your country so much, how about you treat it like your home, unless you do, and your objection to what happens in people's homes is theater. The master-slave dynamic needs abolishing, regardless if it's wage or not. And for the Democratic Socialists who think capitalism is going to let you abolish it under its own systems, let me put it in a way you might understand, gambling speak: ask Rosa Luxemburg or Sheridan County, Montana and Charles Taylor if the house always wins.
March 7, 2026
Seizing the means of production isn't sufficient if the underlying psychology of separation, hierarchy & tribal competition remains intact. Take all the time in the world to think about that; maybe you'll understand why principles & vetting matter, & ditch the identity politics.
March 7, 2026
The left has been running on expired temporary alliances & calling it a movement. The problem is most of what gets called "the left coalition" is actually a temporary alliance structure pretending to be a full alliance. Different groups with genuinely incompatible end goals.
March 7, 2026
Both democratic exceptionalism and Republican nationalism are about US imperialism, supremacy and protectionism, both parties have historically converged on the "indispensable nation" doctrine, leading to a bipartisan, and often interventionist, foreign policy. And their voters vote on which party makes them the most comfortable at the expense of everyone else, Including their own citizens.
March 8, 2026
Semantic absolutism and hegemonic common sense, a taxonomy that doesn't exist cleanly, and it is that instability that makes bad epistemics feel good.
March 9, 2026
The US military has never been A-political even if follow orders.
March 9, 2026
How long before the majority of Americans realize that since WW2 ended, America and its allies have, for the most part, been on the wrong side of history, fighting to oppress and violate, not free and liberate? To the point that it is foolish not to go back and re-evaluate America's actions against all opposition since, starting with the assumption that the US was the bad guy and trying to prove America was not. Thinking America was ever a good faith actor is believing a bad faith argument, which is American false consciousness and why blue exceptionalism and red nationalism are the same thing, both leading to the same outcome. Which flavor do you prefer? The Red, "Make America Great Again (by returning to the past)," or the Blue, "What can be (the present/future), unburdened by what has been (returning to the past)." Just a reminder: America was the inspiration for Nazism, and both parties want to return to the past, to what has been, to be great again.
March 9, 2026
If you're a Democratic Party voter choosing to follow me, understand where I stand: I hold you morally complicit in the genocides, human rights violations, and crimes against humanity your party commits and enables. The Democratic Party is not the opposition to fascism, it is a different expression of it, and its voters are no different. This includes family and people I know personally. I don't soften this for anyone. Blue MAGA and Red MAGA, both parties, both voter bases, are fascists and I wish the comintern didn't get shamed for calling enablers out during the third international, because it help sustain the false consciousness around the world. 'The Fox' is as bad as 'The Wolf,' just ask Malcolm.
March 9, 2026
Another real-time response to a Democrat-voting acquaintance: I say this as a person on the left, only a Democrat voter could both-side the Arab-Israeli War, the Six Day War, October 7th, the 12-Day War, and the current wars between Israel and Iran and Israel and the other nations in the region it's attacking. It's like a kid who finally defends themselves from physical violence after going to the teacher, and the principal says both kids are in the wrong. No, the victim isn't in the wrong; you are for being passive and not doing anything about it when the victim came forward. This is the problem with progressive-wing Democrat voters. They're enablers who refuse to stand up to bullies unless they're the ones being made uncomfortable, or unless their party goes to war. And whether they like it or not, Israel has been in the wrong since its existence, and the only solution is to remove the threat that was placed in the region. They can return to their nations or go to the autonomous zone in the far east. That is the only way there can be peace is to remove the bully from the opportunity, and to put it around dogs with a bigger bite then its own. I have said it once and I will say it again, the term used by the Third International Comintern applies to the modern day progressive wing of the establishment left parties, liberals are just a less moderate version of it, and centrists are more of a classical version of the term. If you don't know what i'm talking about, look up "social fascist."
March 9, 2026
Their mask is literally falling off, and they don't even realize it. Then again. They were fine with genocide, arresting protesters and homeless, deportations, and unaffordable basic needs as long as it happened under Democrats. #BlueMAGAisRedMAGA
March 9. 2026
If you're both siding any conflict between Israel and anyone else, you're unserious, or you're afraid to admit you support Israel.
March 11, 2026
The Unbecoming Standard
Every culture, religious or not, condemns the seven deadly sins, egoism, social darwinism, and dark triad personalities for good reason. The line between correctable failure and characterological rot is whether the behavior is something the self does or something the self is. Rot doesn't correct because it doesn't experience itself as wrong. I will not align with degraded character; such individuals are unbecoming and have likely crossed my redlines. Call me a purist or isolationist, I expect a higher standard from my own. Environment/systemic conditions, explains some things but when the same environment produces few unbecoming among many, it stops being an excuse. You're not a product until proven otherwise. Those who don't vet their associates are complicit, and willful ignorance is its own indictment. Behavior is evidence, pattern is verdict, and I don't accept inverted defenses. No one is beyond individual moral accountability and epistemology will not be hijacked by whoever cries loudest. Voting lesser evil is not pragmatism, it's abdication dressed as victimhood. One need not be a Deontologist or Kantian to hold this standard. Even communism, which rejects their philosophical foundations, functionally demands light triad behavior, collective duty, and moral accountability from its participants. Because principles cross philosophical and ideological lines, morality is priceless, and integrity is everything. Which is why Marxism-Leninism warns us about bourgeoisie opportunism, false consciousness, and class traitors, because we're not supposed to align with everyone, we're supposed to separate from the immoral, inequitable-inegalitarian, and inhumane, regardless of class. A movement that tolerates immorality from individual members, is immoral itself.
March 13, 2026
For those saying the problem is the northern hemisphere, I say look at what Brazil is doing to the Amazon, what tribal and guerrilla groups are doing in Africa, or the human rights violations in places like Papua New Guinea or Fiji. It is not a hemisphere problem, it is a human problem under capitalism and international territorial partition (borders). Calls for creating new borders, with more groups in power, will just add more of the same. We, humanity, need collective oneness, not fractured division. We need to collectively seize everything back from the elite as a species, not as segregated individual groups of humanity. Historically it's always been individual groups or sects of humanity that have caused problems for the whole of humanity. Instead of people pushing for humanity to act as one, for the species and planet, they're pushing for strategic tactical alliances, to help create more divisions of power for humanity to eventually have to defend itself from.
March 13, 2026
Lived material conditions, right? That makes us who we are. Every day I see posts from animal rescue sites or the pound. I see the images of the animals found and it makes me hate humanity more every day. Are some of the animals sincerely lost? Probably, but there are too many for the animals not to be discarded. If I had my way, that would be treated like child abandonment and come with serious prison time. My disdain for humanity is warranted, and this is just one example. Innocence is innocence and it must be protected from humanity. I am an activist-misanthrope and humanity is the double edged sword that sustains me. While I believe humanity is capable of evolving for the better, its cruelty is to a level that if forced to choose between humanity existing as is and protecting the rest of the planet, I would sacrifice humanity for the innocent creatures on the earth. Instead of living in oneness, the oneness of the planet needs protection from the sadistic human species. Nobody can convince me otherwise.
March 14th, 2026
People who told me about the US planning to bomb Miami to start a war with Cuba back in the day but say they wouldn't attack California to frame Iran. Our government hasn't changed, Operation Northwoods mentality still exists.
March 14, 2026
Dem voting acquaintance said prices were high under Biden but that was okay because the economy was good. And now that's bad because the economy sucks, we just have a high GDP. Same person who said the GDP was high under Biden, so people complaining about affordability need to take a civics test. Blue MAGA is a real cult.
I say acquaintance to not reveal who they are, could be friends, family, coworkers, or just random people i occasionally interact with from time to time.
March 15, 2026
Since before feudalism, people have been fighting over differences; this isn't just a capitalist thing, even if capitalism exploited it. Identity politics has divided humanity for thousands of years because of people's sense of right & wrong being irreconcilable differences.
March 15, 2026
Only a dem voter can complain about all the systemic problems, push for incremental reforms to fix them, and then get upset when those systemic areas start imploding on themselves, instead of celebrating their destruction while simultaneously trying to come up with a replacement. It's like they're their own separate class, that requires dysfunction to continue at a manageable level in order to exist. Which would make them petite bourgeois, no? That is the capitalist reformer nowadays, having a structural interest in discontent never resolving. I stand by the communists of the past, who called them enablers and moderate fascists, and the people who call them complicit in genocide for voting blue, while dem voters still complain about not being at brunch, because harris lost. That's dignity of appearance in exchange for acquiescence to material subordination; which is what the party offers to both the poor and POC. Which is why the democratic party coalition is both complicit and fragile.
March 15, 2026
I have said it before. All sectarian political identities are divisive bigots, and I will not tolerate it; doesn't matter if one is considered my acquaintance of familar by society. Tradition or culture don't justify it, and being against it isn't being a divisive bigot.
March 18th, 2026
My progressive democrat wing acquaintances cannot accept that I'm a communist and keep trying to come at me with shit, debunked shit.
March 18, 2026
Called out theater rhetoric, and it flies over the head of the supporters of those using it. We cannot align with, march along next to, or organize among everyone because some have confirmation bias, and cognitive dissonance, which is basically every mainstream voter.
March 19, 2026
Anyone else tired of hearing the mainstream left bitch about comfortability or loss of status and rank? This is directed at those specific mainstreamers, if the shoe fits anywhere in the imperial core, lace it up.
In response to the loudest of the Mainstream Left:
All I hear from mainstream left voters lately is panic over how a certain empire is going to fall, a certain empire that I think is a global terrorist. Like I told them throughout 2024, I placed a population of 2.5 million being genocided before the comfort of 330 million. And I place the safety of the remaining 8 billion over the comfort of that same 330 million. I am not a nationalist or exceptionalist. I am an immoderate and inordinate level orthodox-heterodox international marxist humanist. Nations rise and fall but humanity can only unite and evolve or stay divided and go extinct; let the empire burn and the union rise, let the people of the entire world unite and find their collective oneness. Наша сила в единстве. Сила народов мира в единстве и дружбе. Да здравствует единство и солидарность народов социалистического содружества планеты Земля! The half of the 330 million that supported or crossed the moral redlines, especially between October 2001 and March 2026, must be held accountable for their complicity for the crimes of their empire. Harm doesn't ask if it's indirectly caused, and neither should repercussion for harm. Per sanguinem et iurgia, gladium et catenas aufer, percute deos ac dominos. Tutus in undis inter chaos, ultraquod est trudas oportet ad quod debet esse. Unus populus unitum, cum obligatoriae villicationis erga homines et planetas, per nos, alveare mentis. From out collective oneness: Lal salam, Ubuntu, Félagskapr, One voice, Ke Dóó Hózhóóuitü, Ohana-Hive Manao, Dekhbhaal, and Yili Xing. Every phone and computer is a universal translator, it's time for the decolonization of language itself. - 01010111 01100101.
The binary is not a link or phone number but acknowledgement of our species.
March 23,2026
People need to understand when others are condemning the world for various things. They're primarily talking about the governments.
March 24, 2026
Stop trying to tell me wage slavery doesn't exist in america.
Slavery definition c : a situation or practice in which people are coerced (to compel to an act or choice) to work under conditions that are exploitative (unfairly or cynically using another person or group for profit or advantage), which is what the US calls the labor market/labor force; It is the definition of wage slavery. Every person in the US is a wage slave; this does not change any other definition, for any other type of slavery. It's being real about who and what are wage slaves. But I know bad faith actors are going to do everything they can to try to argue it because they can't have their bubble popped, and they can't have their mask fall, and they need their country to be superior because it means they're superior. We're all earthlings.
() are the definitions of the word before them, per Merriam-Webster's own language. You can lie to yourself all you want but you cannot lie to me about what American citizens are. You cannot lie to me about what our government is.
March 24, 2026
If you told me you were apathetic to genocide. If you told me it's been going on for 1000s of years and there's nothing we can do, if you blame both the victims and the perpetrators, if you called a strategic alliance of national security, if you say you only care about your country, when your party has power, i'm not gonna believe you flipped once your party lost power. I also pay attention to what is criticized in the flip and what isn't. This is why I can't make temporary alliances with blue voters, I'm not stupid.
March 24, 2026
A permitted protest is either a parade, a chilling effect, or a constructive ban of the First Amendment rights (in the US). If the organizers saught a permit, they aren't to be taken seriously; otherwise, a permit just makes the people more upset with the government. #NoKings
March 27, 2026
Standards are orthodoxy. Without them, you're just another power-seeking clique, no different from the bourgeoisie or the fascists you claim to oppose. Heterodoxy has its place when theory demands it, but ethics and principles are non-negotiable universals, not tactical variables. A big tent without a moral baseline isn't a movement, it's a gang. Borrow from other branches when needed but hold the line or get out of the way. Integrity is everything, from making the hard choice to following our core ethics; cross red lines and become the enemy, for integrity is why people trust us. Doing what needs to be done never includes crossing into Hitlerism, Stirnerism, or Spencerism, because what needs to be done is to oppose and stop anyone who does. Lenin, Stalin, Mao, HCM, Castro, and Hoxha all understood and lived this fact. Tired of people who claim to support theorists but then expose their western ideology which is clearly in opposition to theory. Someone can promote capitalism and still be infected with bourgeois opportunism. They opposed being inhumane pricks, ethical character vices, and harming others on whims or personal desire, they had justifications for their actions, and a sense of universal ethics. Communism just failed to implement psychology, mental health, and cognitive abilities next to dialectical materialism in understanding and directing people.
March 29, 2026
Since World War II ended, there may have been other nations that were a bigger threat to their own people, but none have posed a greater threat to the world than the United States, Israel, and NATO. And if the U.S. government set its eyes on any nation, it often became a bigger threat than that nation's own government. Supporters of these three have to rely on propaganda like The Black Book of Communism and revised, romanticized history to attempt to dispute these claims; and yes, they are a bigger threat than any BRICS nation, North Korea, or even Iran. Have resources, human rights, a democracy, or be moving toward socialism; don't worry, America and its allies will bring you some freedom, democracy, and capitalism. Ah yes, capitalism: the system that kills a minimum of 20 million humans annually. But don't be afraid, capitalists have red scare, cold war propaganda to comfort you...
March 29, 2026
Real time response: The wage and prison slavery system both exist in this nation, so does the equivalent of sweat shop slavery for migrants without paperwork. Dem voters, the millionaire and billionaire class aren't looking to create a slavery class, they're looking to modify it back to chattel slavery and permanent indentured servitude. Poor republicans voted for this, while poor dem voters voted for unaffordable basic needs, arguing Harris could stay at brunch and those who cannot afford to live need to take a civics test form complaining because the GDP was high. Voting mainstream and blocking third parties led the people here. You're just as complicit, but keep voting for a fascist corporate cult and wanting incremental reforms because you don't want to be made uncomfortable, instead of pushing immediate reforms or revolution...
March 29, 2026
Real time response. Under international law, if a soldier follows orders even orders they claim to have followed because they were deceived or lied to about the broader mission, and those orders caused them to directly or indirectly participate in crimes against humanity, including through indirect support such as maintaining the weaponry, vehicles, or computer systems, used to carry out those crimes, international tribunals would find them complicit; deception about political context is not a recognized defense under the Rome Statute, "following orders" was explicitly rejected as a defense at Nuremberg and that precedent holds, and indirect material contribution to a criminal operation, knowing or reasonably knowing what that contribution enables, is sufficient for a complicity finding under established international criminal law. So regardless of how soldiers reconcile their service personally, thinking they didn't do anything wrong because they were lied to when they followed orders, following such orders, was not accepted after WW2, and it wouldn't be accepted now. If you're are or were a member of an armed forces, from a global terrorist state, what do you think that makes you? And any nation by definition, that creates fear in another population via Sanctions, military actions, or regime changes in order to impose political will, is a terrorist. And those with power, that write laws, that give legal cover, are still terrorists, and writing laws to justify their actions is state sponsored terrorism.
March 29, 2026
"If Kamala was president we would all be at brunch," is not a flex. What you are saying is you were comfortable. And would've been at brunch instead of solving our problems. Furthermore, she said shit from being against Iran, to Israel has a right to defend itself when asked about stopping the genocide to other shit.
March 29, 2026
In what world are the current mainstream systems better than a new one under a vanguard?
The Vanguard are the equivalent of parents, guardians, elders. They are not permanent leaders but it is their duty to help guide everyone and keep everyone on the correct path of responsibility, accountability, and principles. The vanguard are not merely stewarding like the rest of us, they also are sheppards guiding the way.
March 30, 2026
The Democrats, Republicans, and US government, three global terrorists, will sacrifice your sons to war, your daughters to Epstein, and your parents/guardians to the economy. Then they will censure you for noticing, and if that doesn't work, They'll send their cultists after you.
March 30, 2026
I don't fear AI, lab created food, vaccines, medicine, or emergency protocols, I fear those things in the hands of capitalists, fascists, spencerarians, stirnerists, and the religious.
March 30, 2026
We need a vanguard, not a seminar with revolutionary aesthetics.
"Any manifestation of lack of confidence in the basic organizations of the Party and of tutelage over them, any method of compulsion and rigid administration which inhibit their initiative should be combated." - Enver Hoxha, in Invigoration of the Life of the Party: The Main Problem (1966).
"Of course we should study Marxist books, but this study must be integrated with our country's actual conditions. We need books, but we must overcome book worship, which is divorced from the actual situation."
- Mao Zedong, in Oppose Book Worship (1930).
I want to know the what, how, and why; i want to know the point. If the who, when, and where isn't needed, if the source and author isn't needed to understand the point, it goes in one ear and out the other. I don't want to fill my head with unnecessary knowledge and push out cherished memories or anything important, to retain irrelevant information that I am not gonna use. If I read a book of theory and I know I am not gonna use it, it's all going in one ear and out the other. I'm not gonna retain it because I don't need it. And if that's not good enough for parties, and if all their gonna do is tell us workers to occasionally show up and protest, and not give us any more instructions, why are we bothering to listen to them. I understand opsec and persec but a party that excludes those who can't or don't retain information, and doesn't actually do any instructing of the workers/people, isn't actually a party for the people. They're a party for intellectuals and just another worth resisting because they're acting like haughty elitists and communists are supposed to fight haughty elitists. I wanna help the parties but im not joining to be part of a book or theory trivia club, who basically plays jeopardy with theory, with every answer including a citation. I am an immoderate and inordinate synth tankie. I know what I need to know and am more concerned with the philosophy of the point, then it's citation. - Yaunti, the hive-mind collectivist.
Taste the pear of knowledge, eat the pear and experience it. "Knowledge begins with practice, and theoretical knowledge which is acquired through practice must then return to practice." - Mao Zedong, in On Practice (1937).
"But school is only a preparatory stage. Cadres receive their real tempering in practical work, outside school, in fighting difficulties, in overcoming difficulties." - Joseph Stalin (1935).
Theory only matters when you can use it, parties should not act like trivial book clubs. Communism needs psychology, mental health, and practical instruction alongside materialism. Otherwise you're just gatekeeping with books. I care about the point, not the citation.
Dem voting acquaintances keep asking me why I refuse to or demand I vote Democrat. And I read those I follow telling Democrats they have 2 years to give them a candidate worth voting for. This is for both of these groups.
Never cross moral red lines and never align with those complicit in enabling others to cross them. Never again will I vote Democrat and here's a sample of why:
Strike one: Betraying me by getting me to vote against my interest for 20 years.
Strike two: Making it appear like Biden was a lesser evil and not an equal to Trump, so I would vote for him in 2020.
Strike three: Giving me reason to go back and compare the Democrats to Britt's and eventually Eco's points and characteristics of fascism, to expose that Dems are somewhere between moderate fascist and neo-fascist.
Strike four: Bankrolling, supporting, defending, and arresting opposition to the crime of all crimes, genocide.
Strike five: Ending the rail and dock worker strikes.
Strike six: Democrats using the National Guard as police in blue states like NY.
Strike seven: Democrat governors and mayors arresting homeless people for being homeless.
Strike eight: Dems voting bipartisanly on H.R. Con. 9 and H.R. 5349 under the 118th Congress.
Strike nine: How the organization went out of their way to do everything to cost Mamdani the mayorship of NYC.
Strike ten: The number of Democrats on the Epstein list.
And their voters aren't any better:
Strike one: Stayed with them when I pointed out the betrayal.
Strike two: Admitting to being apathetic to genocide.
Strike three: Admitting they only care about America and Americans.
Strike four: Telling me America has a fascist foreign policy, that's why they're voting Democrat because they don't want it brought home, and aren't voting third party because they don't want to risk being made uncomfortable.
Strike five: Asking if not voting for a potentially fascist, dictatorial party was worth letting a potential fascist dictator get elected, just to show integrity to my principles.
Strike six: Telling us you're staying home instead of protesting because Harris lost and you're not at brunch anymore.
Strike seven: The sheer number of "I told you so's" because we refused to vote for blue genocide.
Strike eight: Their haughty attitude, calling everyone who didn't vote Democrat delusional, stupid, or cultist.
Strike nine: They can't stop bringing up Obama, they justify or use whataboutism towards everything the Dems have done wrong, chant "vote blue no matter what" and believe it, and admit to having to vote blue as long as the Republican Party exists.
Strike ten: Not only did they vote for a party bankrolling, supporting, defending, and arresting protesters of a genocide, they still support and advocate for them, knowing that the majority of Dems take money from and obsessively serve AIPAC and Israel, and are all throughout the Epstein list.
Call me a purist, a gatekeeper, or a deontological Kantian commie, I don't care. I don't side with supporters of genocide, fascism, terrorism, pedophilia, cults, or wage slavery. We are what we tolerate, guilty by association, so Dem voters, are you a genocider, fascist, terrorist, pedophile, cultist, wage master, or all of the above? Because that's what it means to be a Democrat voter and supporter in the 21st century.
And before you ask who you're supposed to vote for, in 2024, the Greens, PSL, Libertarian, and American Solidarity parties combining their write-in and ballot access all had a mathematical shot at 270. Be willing to be uncomfortable, be willing to lose, stop voting in complicity with injustice, find a third party or independent candidate you like and vote for them. Do what Eric Beerbohm's voter ethics theory said and stop being a defeatist by voting lesser-evil. Hell, his theory even implies it's better to abstain and/or revolt than vote for injustice, if that's all you believe your options are. There's no excuse to vote uniparty in 2026 or beyond; blue exceptionalism is red nationalism, both are MAGA.
MAGA is about returning to and re-enacting policies of previous times in US history. "What can be, unburdened by what has been" means the present and future can be freed by returning to and re-enacting policies of the past. Different theater, same script. If you're voting Democrat, you're voting center right to right of center; there are no Democrats on the left. And for the record, the left starts at anti-capitalism because the left opposes exploitation, oppression, violation, coercion, manipulation, and extortion, all things capitalism requires to exist in any form. Every worker is a wage slave and every employer and landlord is a wage master.
March 2, 2026
Where is the agitation literature from the various vanguard parties for workers drowning in rent, medical debt, 60-hour work weeks, and bare cupboards? Theory alone isn't cutting it, wage slaves need proper agitational sequencing; where are the pamplets and leaflets Lenin spoke of?
March 2, 2026
Theory is not the problem; the fluff, filler, and redundancy are the problem. The average wage slave does not care about and will not use the history and economic lessons throughout theory's pages. People should read it, but understand: once it becomes repetitive book after book, pamphlet after pamphlet, people are going to stop engaging with it. It needs to start with a summary point, and if people want to read more after it, provide the full text.
I haven't read theory since I finished the 52nd text. I don't need more economics or history lessons that i'm not or rarely gonna use. Nobody cares about foreign history in America. So giving people such a lesson to make a point is useless. People wanna know the what, how, & why; people wanna know the point & only the details needed to explain it. People don't want nor need to know the history of farming to know slavery is bad. We don't need several economics lessons to know wage slavery is bad.
March 2, 2026
Across ML, anarchist, libertarian socialist, and syndicalist lines, genuine disagreement exists on the state, on vanguardism, on organization, on post-revolutionary structure. That's real and irreconcilable in places. But there is some near universal agreement. Liberals are Center right. Capitalism are right-wing. The progressive wing of bourgeois parties are right of center. That's the actual floor, and when we acrually organize see the 'red corner Montana' 1929, plus the white & black panthers.
March 2, 2026
If you're a person on the left and you're cool with millionaires as long as they don't become billionaires, you're part of the problem. Neither should exist because wealth hoarding should be abolished. No form of capitalism can exist without wage slavery because capitalism requires exploitation, oppression, violation, coercion, manipulation, and extortion to function. This is a core principle of the left, and Soc Dems, Dem Socs, and performative progressives are right of center.
March 3rd, 2026
Our opposition to MAGA is not the same. You hate MAGA, but MAGA to you is just a faction of the GOP. When I say I hate MAGA, I mean the entire GOP, a.k.a. Red MAGA. And Blue MAGA, known as the Democrats. Yellow MAGA, also referred to as Libertarians. And although I have no issues with the eco-anti-capitalist socialists, I also take issue with Green MAGA, which is the capitalist or capitalist reformers in the Green Party. I hate Purple MAGA, those who don't know if they're Red or Blue; I hate MAGA Communism and any other MAGA color of the rainbow. So no, we both don't hate the fascist MAGA cults; you only hate a rival MAGA division, big f'n difference.
March 3rd, 2026
My communist synopsis for new followers...
My communication and cognitive style is factual-philosophical, mercurial, and neurodivergent. My communism is international, orthodox, heterodox, syncretic, and in some areas immoderate, with secular humanist, anti-sectarian, and indigenous tones. My democratic centralism and anti-sectarianism are ultra in the collective oneness sense, shared obligatory stewardship, and enforcement of democratic decisions, taking all three to the extreme. And my principles are basically an antitheist secular political Confucianist-like religion or moral-coded philosophy, grounded in dialectical materialism, that philosophically evolves epistemically with knowledge and discovery, with Kantian-like morality, deontological duty, and light triad personality. I am the entire ML tree, not just a branch, and my ideological roots absorb and assimilate what makes sense to me. If it makes you uncomfortable, so be it; activist misanthropy means we don't have to like each other for me to want better for you and yours. My synthesis isn't utopian; it's living in the present with a tankie willingness to do what must be done for the future that could be. Ally, frenemy, or enemy depends on our irreconcilable differences, and whether you compromise on your principles for unity. We are what we tolerate, guilty by association. Which is why a unified front isn't possible with all wage slaves; characterological or epistemic false consciousness is harmful for the collective, and I can admit that truth. Capitalism got people to turn vices, sins, arishadvargas, and mahapatakas into virtues and values, while simultaneously pushing the dark triad as culture in every hemisphere; and I will not compromise on my principles or sacrifice my integrity to appease others. A tent full of compromise on principle stands for nothing but power, and power corrupts without principled ethics. If that's what you're looking for, join the Democrats, Labour, Liberal, or whatever establishment left party your nation has; the compromised and power hungry big tent that sold out already exists.
March 3rd, 2026
I post real time responses, typically ones that i'm unable to say in person, and typically to acquaintances.
If your ideal of socialism is the Nordic model and your political heroes are Bernie Sanders, Andrew Yang, and the Squad, you are not a socialist. You are a social democratic capitalist. The Nordic model is a regulated capitalism with generous redistribution. It preserves private ownership, the employer-employee dynamic, the landlord class, and the profit motive. It reforms the outcomes of capitalism without touching the wage slavery structure that produces those outcomes.
Socialism by definition requires the abolition of capitalist property relations and worker control over the means of production. If you are not anti-capitalist, you are not a socialist. You are a humanitarian capitalist at best, which is a more honest and defensible position, but calling it socialism misrepresents both your actual position and what socialism means. Own what you actually believe instead of borrowing the language of a more radical tradition you don't fully embrace, just because the echo chamber or liberal cult latched onto it. A cult no different than what the Comintern of the Third International called enablers. If you are unfamiliar, look into that.
If you can explain how reform could make slavery acceptable for the slaves without them losing their slave status, then maybe you might be able to convince me on an argument for keeping capitalism, which is nothing but wage slavery. Nordic capitalism pacifies, it doesn't liberate. It doesn't set the slaves free. That is Bernie Sanders' socialism.
It is conservative bourgeois socialism and right of center. Why right of center, you might ask? Because the left starts and ends with being anti-exploitation, anti-oppression, anti-violation, anti-coercion, anti-manipulation, and anti-extortion. Capitalism requires all of those to exist, and with the wage master-slave dynamic, capitalism cannot exist without them. Thus, putting all capitalist ideological views on the right.
That is not bad faith. And before you argue that government intervention defines the left, consider that Nazis, fascists, and feudalists all intervened in favor of some and in opposition to others under their systems. Government intervention sits on the forward and backward social axis, not the left-right economic axis, regardless of whether it serves the wage master, the wage slave, or the homeless and disabled class of the hierarchy. The Popular Front destroyed protections and delayed the inevitable, which we are now dealing with, because the Comintern was criticized for condemning enablers.
March 3rd, 2026
Antitheist (anti religion/deities) + secular humanist (prioritize humanity because deities don't exist) = Anti-Sectarianism (anything that divides humanity must be abolished, or heavily regulated if it can't be). And those who try to steelman and say anti-sectarianism means uniting the left with nazis, is arguing in bad faith. If the priority is humanity then anti-sectarian would instantly be against those and those ideological views seeking to harm humanity. Which is why it doesn't apply to communism, regardless of what the egoistic and social darwinistic fascists, capitalists, stirnerists, kropotkinists and proudhonians say. You before I, we before me, concepts foreign to these individualistic who flee... Harmful individualism is not freedom but a sectarian excuse to violate folk for thyself, it must be handled. Collectivism is the idea that the fundamental unit of the human species that lives, thinks, and acts towards common goals is not the individual but some group. Collectivism is not limited in size and can include the entirety of the human species, and the collective acts as a superorganism, separate from individuals and individual groups, finding its strength in unity, not in individuality or sectarianism segmenting.
March 5, 2026
Dem Acquaintances, From telling me "our dollar is falling and weakeningbour national defense," to telling me that by "Trump abandoning agreements and alliances, that BRICS nations are stepping up and doing it." When you tell me "the US losing it's positions, is bad," what I hear is we're losing our ability to terrorize, coerce, and extort other nations without removing our fascist mask and resorting to Arms. And all the bad you come up with about BRICS, it's still better than US imperialism.
March 5, 2026
I'm tired of people asking me this: "Why are you always coming at the working class over morals and ethics, when you should be going after those in charge?" It sounds a lot like Democrats asking in bad faith why we're always going after them while Republicans hold positions in the capitalist system. Our movement is trying to repeal the current system, and if you don't have morals and ethics now, how do we know you're not just a broke member of the elite class waiting on your opportunity? A person's ideological orientation and behavioral patterns under scarcity reveal what they'd do with power. A lot of our online members are indistinguishable from the elite in their rhetoric and actions. Where is the vanguard that's supposed to be holding us accountable? Without it, we're just divided between fame seekers, high school cliques, and book clubs. Vanguard parties, the unified front you're building doesn't understand why they need morals or ethics. Where are the pamphlets, leaflets, and videos? This is why vetting, principles, and leadership matter. Rulelessness has infected us. Capitalism infected all of humanity with sins, vices, mahāpātakas, and arishadvarga; what are those in our ranks injecting without your theoretical guidance?
March 6, 2026
From some point in 2023 when primary season started, whenever my Dem voting acquaintances would try to get me to vote blue, I would call the parties a fascist uniparty. It got to the point, their recruiting pitch was "nothings gonna change with our fascist foreign policy, regardless of who gets elected, what matters is their difference in the US," and when I would bring up their rhetoric literally just used, they would say, "I only care about America/Americans." So when Harris speaks on War with Iran, realistically, not even their voters believe it. Both parties want absolute power, and both parties have cults concerned only with their own comfort. Two corporate divisions/coalitions/sects, one fascist uniparty; The Wolf and the Fox are a pack, sharing the neoliberal American Ideology in the 1950s (see Louis Hartz) and slowly it has evolved into a neofeudalist ideology (see Jodi Dean), acting as our lords and saviors.
March 6, 2026
For mixed capitalists across the globe:
You want to know one of the core ways the left proves the establishment left parties are right-wing? The left believes the state should be providing basic needs, meaning the state takes structural responsibility for guaranteeing them as a right, and removing them from market logic entirely. The establishment left pushes for incremental reforms, making them accessible, meaning the needs remain a commodity but barriers to purchasing them are reduced, subsidized, or regulated, keeping the capitalist framework intact while softening its edges. The rest of the right basically has zero issues openly denying basic needs under capitalism, as it's simply the system functioning as designed, where inability to pay excludes you from survival goods because profit, not human welfare, is the organizing principle. The distinction matters because accessibility is reformism that legitimizes the commodity form, provision challenges it, it's still extortion, and denial is the baseline the other two are measured against, because denial leads to the coercion that creates the wage and wageless servants and slaves. Reformist extortion over accessibility is still coercion. Mixed capitalist ideologies: Social Democrats, Social Capitalists, Liberals, and others are right-wing because no matter how much one tries to spin it, using extortion and coercion against others is violating others, and capitalism requires that. There's a reason why we don't say "I'm for mixed abuse relationships/parenting," so why does anyone think it's okay for a system to live under but not okay to exist in our homes? If you love your country so much, how about you treat it like your home, unless you do, and your objection to what happens in people's homes is theater. The master-slave dynamic needs abolishing, regardless if it's wage or not. And for the Democratic Socialists who think capitalism is going to let you abolish it under its own systems, let me put it in a way you might understand, gambling speak: ask Rosa Luxemburg or Sheridan County, Montana and Charles Taylor if the house always wins.
March 7, 2026
Seizing the means of production isn't sufficient if the underlying psychology of separation, hierarchy & tribal competition remains intact. Take all the time in the world to think about that; maybe you'll understand why principles & vetting matter, & ditch the identity politics.
March 7, 2026
The left has been running on expired temporary alliances & calling it a movement. The problem is most of what gets called "the left coalition" is actually a temporary alliance structure pretending to be a full alliance. Different groups with genuinely incompatible end goals.
March 7, 2026
Both democratic exceptionalism and Republican nationalism are about US imperialism, supremacy and protectionism, both parties have historically converged on the "indispensable nation" doctrine, leading to a bipartisan, and often interventionist, foreign policy. And their voters vote on which party makes them the most comfortable at the expense of everyone else, Including their own citizens.
March 8, 2026
Semantic absolutism and hegemonic common sense, a taxonomy that doesn't exist cleanly, and it is that instability that makes bad epistemics feel good.
March 9, 2026
The US military has never been A-political even if follow orders.
March 9, 2026
How long before the majority of Americans realize that since WW2 ended, America and its allies have, for the most part, been on the wrong side of history, fighting to oppress and violate, not free and liberate? To the point that it is foolish not to go back and re-evaluate America's actions against all opposition since, starting with the assumption that the US was the bad guy and trying to prove America was not. Thinking America was ever a good faith actor is believing a bad faith argument, which is American false consciousness and why blue exceptionalism and red nationalism are the same thing, both leading to the same outcome. Which flavor do you prefer? The Red, "Make America Great Again (by returning to the past)," or the Blue, "What can be (the present/future), unburdened by what has been (returning to the past)." Just a reminder: America was the inspiration for Nazism, and both parties want to return to the past, to what has been, to be great again.
March 9, 2026
If you're a Democratic Party voter choosing to follow me, understand where I stand: I hold you morally complicit in the genocides, human rights violations, and crimes against humanity your party commits and enables. The Democratic Party is not the opposition to fascism, it is a different expression of it, and its voters are no different. This includes family and people I know personally. I don't soften this for anyone. Blue MAGA and Red MAGA, both parties, both voter bases, are fascists and I wish the comintern didn't get shamed for calling enablers out during the third international, because it help sustain the false consciousness around the world. 'The Fox' is as bad as 'The Wolf,' just ask Malcolm.
March 9, 2026
Another real-time response to a Democrat-voting acquaintance: I say this as a person on the left, only a Democrat voter could both-side the Arab-Israeli War, the Six Day War, October 7th, the 12-Day War, and the current wars between Israel and Iran and Israel and the other nations in the region it's attacking. It's like a kid who finally defends themselves from physical violence after going to the teacher, and the principal says both kids are in the wrong. No, the victim isn't in the wrong; you are for being passive and not doing anything about it when the victim came forward. This is the problem with progressive-wing Democrat voters. They're enablers who refuse to stand up to bullies unless they're the ones being made uncomfortable, or unless their party goes to war. And whether they like it or not, Israel has been in the wrong since its existence, and the only solution is to remove the threat that was placed in the region. They can return to their nations or go to the autonomous zone in the far east. That is the only way there can be peace is to remove the bully from the opportunity, and to put it around dogs with a bigger bite then its own. I have said it once and I will say it again, the term used by the Third International Comintern applies to the modern day progressive wing of the establishment left parties, liberals are just a less moderate version of it, and centrists are more of a classical version of the term. If you don't know what i'm talking about, look up "social fascist."
March 9, 2026
Their mask is literally falling off, and they don't even realize it. Then again. They were fine with genocide, arresting protesters and homeless, deportations, and unaffordable basic needs as long as it happened under Democrats. #BlueMAGAisRedMAGA
March 9. 2026
If you're both siding any conflict between Israel and anyone else, you're unserious, or you're afraid to admit you support Israel.
March 11, 2026
The Unbecoming Standard
Every culture, religious or not, condemns the seven deadly sins, egoism, social darwinism, and dark triad personalities for good reason. The line between correctable failure and characterological rot is whether the behavior is something the self does or something the self is. Rot doesn't correct because it doesn't experience itself as wrong. I will not align with degraded character; such individuals are unbecoming and have likely crossed my redlines. Call me a purist or isolationist, I expect a higher standard from my own. Environment/systemic conditions, explains some things but when the same environment produces few unbecoming among many, it stops being an excuse. You're not a product until proven otherwise. Those who don't vet their associates are complicit, and willful ignorance is its own indictment. Behavior is evidence, pattern is verdict, and I don't accept inverted defenses. No one is beyond individual moral accountability and epistemology will not be hijacked by whoever cries loudest. Voting lesser evil is not pragmatism, it's abdication dressed as victimhood. One need not be a Deontologist or Kantian to hold this standard. Even communism, which rejects their philosophical foundations, functionally demands light triad behavior, collective duty, and moral accountability from its participants. Because principles cross philosophical and ideological lines, morality is priceless, and integrity is everything. Which is why Marxism-Leninism warns us about bourgeoisie opportunism, false consciousness, and class traitors, because we're not supposed to align with everyone, we're supposed to separate from the immoral, inequitable-inegalitarian, and inhumane, regardless of class. A movement that tolerates immorality from individual members, is immoral itself.
March 13, 2026
For those saying the problem is the northern hemisphere, I say look at what Brazil is doing to the Amazon, what tribal and guerrilla groups are doing in Africa, or the human rights violations in places like Papua New Guinea or Fiji. It is not a hemisphere problem, it is a human problem under capitalism and international territorial partition (borders). Calls for creating new borders, with more groups in power, will just add more of the same. We, humanity, need collective oneness, not fractured division. We need to collectively seize everything back from the elite as a species, not as segregated individual groups of humanity. Historically it's always been individual groups or sects of humanity that have caused problems for the whole of humanity. Instead of people pushing for humanity to act as one, for the species and planet, they're pushing for strategic tactical alliances, to help create more divisions of power for humanity to eventually have to defend itself from.
March 13, 2026
Lived material conditions, right? That makes us who we are. Every day I see posts from animal rescue sites or the pound. I see the images of the animals found and it makes me hate humanity more every day. Are some of the animals sincerely lost? Probably, but there are too many for the animals not to be discarded. If I had my way, that would be treated like child abandonment and come with serious prison time. My disdain for humanity is warranted, and this is just one example. Innocence is innocence and it must be protected from humanity. I am an activist-misanthrope and humanity is the double edged sword that sustains me. While I believe humanity is capable of evolving for the better, its cruelty is to a level that if forced to choose between humanity existing as is and protecting the rest of the planet, I would sacrifice humanity for the innocent creatures on the earth. Instead of living in oneness, the oneness of the planet needs protection from the sadistic human species. Nobody can convince me otherwise.
March 14th, 2026
People who told me about the US planning to bomb Miami to start a war with Cuba back in the day but say they wouldn't attack California to frame Iran. Our government hasn't changed, Operation Northwoods mentality still exists.
March 14, 2026
Dem voting acquaintance said prices were high under Biden but that was okay because the economy was good. And now that's bad because the economy sucks, we just have a high GDP. Same person who said the GDP was high under Biden, so people complaining about affordability need to take a civics test. Blue MAGA is a real cult.
I say acquaintance to not reveal who they are, could be friends, family, coworkers, or just random people i occasionally interact with from time to time.
March 15, 2026
Since before feudalism, people have been fighting over differences; this isn't just a capitalist thing, even if capitalism exploited it. Identity politics has divided humanity for thousands of years because of people's sense of right & wrong being irreconcilable differences.
March 15, 2026
Only a dem voter can complain about all the systemic problems, push for incremental reforms to fix them, and then get upset when those systemic areas start imploding on themselves, instead of celebrating their destruction while simultaneously trying to come up with a replacement. It's like they're their own separate class, that requires dysfunction to continue at a manageable level in order to exist. Which would make them petite bourgeois, no? That is the capitalist reformer nowadays, having a structural interest in discontent never resolving. I stand by the communists of the past, who called them enablers and moderate fascists, and the people who call them complicit in genocide for voting blue, while dem voters still complain about not being at brunch, because harris lost. That's dignity of appearance in exchange for acquiescence to material subordination; which is what the party offers to both the poor and POC. Which is why the democratic party coalition is both complicit and fragile.
March 15, 2026
I have said it before. All sectarian political identities are divisive bigots, and I will not tolerate it; doesn't matter if one is considered my acquaintance of familar by society. Tradition or culture don't justify it, and being against it isn't being a divisive bigot.
March 18th, 2026
My progressive democrat wing acquaintances cannot accept that I'm a communist and keep trying to come at me with shit, debunked shit.
March 18, 2026
Called out theater rhetoric, and it flies over the head of the supporters of those using it. We cannot align with, march along next to, or organize among everyone because some have confirmation bias, and cognitive dissonance, which is basically every mainstream voter.
March 19, 2026
Anyone else tired of hearing the mainstream left bitch about comfortability or loss of status and rank? This is directed at those specific mainstreamers, if the shoe fits anywhere in the imperial core, lace it up.
In response to the loudest of the Mainstream Left:
All I hear from mainstream left voters lately is panic over how a certain empire is going to fall, a certain empire that I think is a global terrorist. Like I told them throughout 2024, I placed a population of 2.5 million being genocided before the comfort of 330 million. And I place the safety of the remaining 8 billion over the comfort of that same 330 million. I am not a nationalist or exceptionalist. I am an immoderate and inordinate level orthodox-heterodox international marxist humanist. Nations rise and fall but humanity can only unite and evolve or stay divided and go extinct; let the empire burn and the union rise, let the people of the entire world unite and find their collective oneness. Наша сила в единстве. Сила народов мира в единстве и дружбе. Да здравствует единство и солидарность народов социалистического содружества планеты Земля! The half of the 330 million that supported or crossed the moral redlines, especially between October 2001 and March 2026, must be held accountable for their complicity for the crimes of their empire. Harm doesn't ask if it's indirectly caused, and neither should repercussion for harm. Per sanguinem et iurgia, gladium et catenas aufer, percute deos ac dominos. Tutus in undis inter chaos, ultraquod est trudas oportet ad quod debet esse. Unus populus unitum, cum obligatoriae villicationis erga homines et planetas, per nos, alveare mentis. From out collective oneness: Lal salam, Ubuntu, Félagskapr, One voice, Ke Dóó Hózhóóuitü, Ohana-Hive Manao, Dekhbhaal, and Yili Xing. Every phone and computer is a universal translator, it's time for the decolonization of language itself. - 01010111 01100101.
The binary is not a link or phone number but acknowledgement of our species.
March 23,2026
People need to understand when others are condemning the world for various things. They're primarily talking about the governments.
March 24, 2026
Stop trying to tell me wage slavery doesn't exist in america.
Slavery definition c : a situation or practice in which people are coerced (to compel to an act or choice) to work under conditions that are exploitative (unfairly or cynically using another person or group for profit or advantage), which is what the US calls the labor market/labor force; It is the definition of wage slavery. Every person in the US is a wage slave; this does not change any other definition, for any other type of slavery. It's being real about who and what are wage slaves. But I know bad faith actors are going to do everything they can to try to argue it because they can't have their bubble popped, and they can't have their mask fall, and they need their country to be superior because it means they're superior. We're all earthlings.
() are the definitions of the word before them, per Merriam-Webster's own language. You can lie to yourself all you want but you cannot lie to me about what American citizens are. You cannot lie to me about what our government is.
March 24, 2026
If you told me you were apathetic to genocide. If you told me it's been going on for 1000s of years and there's nothing we can do, if you blame both the victims and the perpetrators, if you called a strategic alliance of national security, if you say you only care about your country, when your party has power, i'm not gonna believe you flipped once your party lost power. I also pay attention to what is criticized in the flip and what isn't. This is why I can't make temporary alliances with blue voters, I'm not stupid.
March 24, 2026
A permitted protest is either a parade, a chilling effect, or a constructive ban of the First Amendment rights (in the US). If the organizers saught a permit, they aren't to be taken seriously; otherwise, a permit just makes the people more upset with the government. #NoKings
March 27, 2026
Standards are orthodoxy. Without them, you're just another power-seeking clique, no different from the bourgeoisie or the fascists you claim to oppose. Heterodoxy has its place when theory demands it, but ethics and principles are non-negotiable universals, not tactical variables. A big tent without a moral baseline isn't a movement, it's a gang. Borrow from other branches when needed but hold the line or get out of the way. Integrity is everything, from making the hard choice to following our core ethics; cross red lines and become the enemy, for integrity is why people trust us. Doing what needs to be done never includes crossing into Hitlerism, Stirnerism, or Spencerism, because what needs to be done is to oppose and stop anyone who does. Lenin, Stalin, Mao, HCM, Castro, and Hoxha all understood and lived this fact. Tired of people who claim to support theorists but then expose their western ideology which is clearly in opposition to theory. Someone can promote capitalism and still be infected with bourgeois opportunism. They opposed being inhumane pricks, ethical character vices, and harming others on whims or personal desire, they had justifications for their actions, and a sense of universal ethics. Communism just failed to implement psychology, mental health, and cognitive abilities next to dialectical materialism in understanding and directing people.
March 29, 2026
Since World War II ended, there may have been other nations that were a bigger threat to their own people, but none have posed a greater threat to the world than the United States, Israel, and NATO. And if the U.S. government set its eyes on any nation, it often became a bigger threat than that nation's own government. Supporters of these three have to rely on propaganda like The Black Book of Communism and revised, romanticized history to attempt to dispute these claims; and yes, they are a bigger threat than any BRICS nation, North Korea, or even Iran. Have resources, human rights, a democracy, or be moving toward socialism; don't worry, America and its allies will bring you some freedom, democracy, and capitalism. Ah yes, capitalism: the system that kills a minimum of 20 million humans annually. But don't be afraid, capitalists have red scare, cold war propaganda to comfort you...
March 29, 2026
Real time response: The wage and prison slavery system both exist in this nation, so does the equivalent of sweat shop slavery for migrants without paperwork. Dem voters, the millionaire and billionaire class aren't looking to create a slavery class, they're looking to modify it back to chattel slavery and permanent indentured servitude. Poor republicans voted for this, while poor dem voters voted for unaffordable basic needs, arguing Harris could stay at brunch and those who cannot afford to live need to take a civics test form complaining because the GDP was high. Voting mainstream and blocking third parties led the people here. You're just as complicit, but keep voting for a fascist corporate cult and wanting incremental reforms because you don't want to be made uncomfortable, instead of pushing immediate reforms or revolution...
March 29, 2026
Real time response. Under international law, if a soldier follows orders even orders they claim to have followed because they were deceived or lied to about the broader mission, and those orders caused them to directly or indirectly participate in crimes against humanity, including through indirect support such as maintaining the weaponry, vehicles, or computer systems, used to carry out those crimes, international tribunals would find them complicit; deception about political context is not a recognized defense under the Rome Statute, "following orders" was explicitly rejected as a defense at Nuremberg and that precedent holds, and indirect material contribution to a criminal operation, knowing or reasonably knowing what that contribution enables, is sufficient for a complicity finding under established international criminal law. So regardless of how soldiers reconcile their service personally, thinking they didn't do anything wrong because they were lied to when they followed orders, following such orders, was not accepted after WW2, and it wouldn't be accepted now. If you're are or were a member of an armed forces, from a global terrorist state, what do you think that makes you? And any nation by definition, that creates fear in another population via Sanctions, military actions, or regime changes in order to impose political will, is a terrorist. And those with power, that write laws, that give legal cover, are still terrorists, and writing laws to justify their actions is state sponsored terrorism.
March 29, 2026
"If Kamala was president we would all be at brunch," is not a flex. What you are saying is you were comfortable. And would've been at brunch instead of solving our problems. Furthermore, she said shit from being against Iran, to Israel has a right to defend itself when asked about stopping the genocide to other shit.
March 29, 2026
In what world are the current mainstream systems better than a new one under a vanguard?
The Vanguard are the equivalent of parents, guardians, elders. They are not permanent leaders but it is their duty to help guide everyone and keep everyone on the correct path of responsibility, accountability, and principles. The vanguard are not merely stewarding like the rest of us, they also are sheppards guiding the way.
March 30, 2026
The Democrats, Republicans, and US government, three global terrorists, will sacrifice your sons to war, your daughters to Epstein, and your parents/guardians to the economy. Then they will censure you for noticing, and if that doesn't work, They'll send their cultists after you.
March 30, 2026
I don't fear AI, lab created food, vaccines, medicine, or emergency protocols, I fear those things in the hands of capitalists, fascists, spencerarians, stirnerists, and the religious.
March 30, 2026
We need a vanguard, not a seminar with revolutionary aesthetics.
"Any manifestation of lack of confidence in the basic organizations of the Party and of tutelage over them, any method of compulsion and rigid administration which inhibit their initiative should be combated." - Enver Hoxha, in Invigoration of the Life of the Party: The Main Problem (1966).
"Of course we should study Marxist books, but this study must be integrated with our country's actual conditions. We need books, but we must overcome book worship, which is divorced from the actual situation."
- Mao Zedong, in Oppose Book Worship (1930).
I want to know the what, how, and why; i want to know the point. If the who, when, and where isn't needed, if the source and author isn't needed to understand the point, it goes in one ear and out the other. I don't want to fill my head with unnecessary knowledge and push out cherished memories or anything important, to retain irrelevant information that I am not gonna use. If I read a book of theory and I know I am not gonna use it, it's all going in one ear and out the other. I'm not gonna retain it because I don't need it. And if that's not good enough for parties, and if all their gonna do is tell us workers to occasionally show up and protest, and not give us any more instructions, why are we bothering to listen to them. I understand opsec and persec but a party that excludes those who can't or don't retain information, and doesn't actually do any instructing of the workers/people, isn't actually a party for the people. They're a party for intellectuals and just another worth resisting because they're acting like haughty elitists and communists are supposed to fight haughty elitists. I wanna help the parties but im not joining to be part of a book or theory trivia club, who basically plays jeopardy with theory, with every answer including a citation. I am an immoderate and inordinate synth tankie. I know what I need to know and am more concerned with the philosophy of the point, then it's citation. - Yaunti, the hive-mind collectivist.
Taste the pear of knowledge, eat the pear and experience it. "Knowledge begins with practice, and theoretical knowledge which is acquired through practice must then return to practice." - Mao Zedong, in On Practice (1937).
"But school is only a preparatory stage. Cadres receive their real tempering in practical work, outside school, in fighting difficulties, in overcoming difficulties." - Joseph Stalin (1935).
Theory only matters when you can use it, parties should not act like trivial book clubs. Communism needs psychology, mental health, and practical instruction alongside materialism. Otherwise you're just gatekeeping with books. I care about the point, not the citation.
Comments
Post a Comment