Synthesized Collectivism Is The Way

Every single life on the planet is an earthling. Every person on the planet is a human. Humans are divided by man-made political identities into categories, sects, and classes. As long as humans are divided into anything other than human, there will always be a hierarchy. As long as humans saw themselves as anything but earthling first, there would be a hierarchy.

Division which can be abolished must be abolished; that which cannot be abolished must be heavily regulated. That is the only way communism, an equitable-egalitarian society, can be achieved.

The entire Marxism-Leninism tree, including that which is entangled in both the roots and branches, from dialectical materialism to psychology and philosophy, to the Haudenosaunee, the Nguni Bantu, the Hopi, the Dayak, and others, must be combined into a synthesized, immoderately-inordinate system to free humanity and the planet and to protect the innocent and defenseless.

Many communist writings call communism humanism; communists and non-communists alike have even referred to communism as the humanist religion, comparing it to the philosophy of Buddhism, Jainism, Confucianism, Taoism, Carvaka, Stoicism, Gattungswesen, and others. Some have even called it an activist-misanthrope philosophy, so everything I have said is not new.

Tankies just don't enforce this philosophical-ideological view, and too many other communists are too worried about numbers and opportunity to act. I have said I am willing to walk alone, but I understand what needs to be done.

We must come from a position, state, or condition that exists at an excessive and unreasonable scale, which was actively built and maintained through a deliberate and total absence of restraint; but solitude cannot solve our collective problems or fulfill our duties.

From talking with others: Maxim Gorky, Gerald Taiaiake Alfred, Leopoldina Fortunati, Taiaiake Alfred, Robin Wall Kimmerer, Winona LaDuke, Leanne Betasamosake Simpson, Vine Deloria Jr., Raya Dunayevskaya, Erich Fromm, Frantz Fanon, Mao Zedong, Herbert Marcuse, Antonio Gramsci, Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Joseph Stalin, Pyotr Fedoseev, and Alexander Fadeyev all apparently got onto similar thought at one point or another. My question is why they got away from it because they did communism a disservice in the process.