Why Aren't We All Post National Internationalists?

Everyone is a product of their environment, but they're also a product of any medical or biological development conditions that keep them from being neurotypical. Not every communist fits this description, not every communist shares this philosophical ideological view.

A secular humanist international communist and planetary patriot, morally wounded and betrayed by the Democratic Party, with moral resentment at the population for crossing redlines and displaying the dark triad time and time again.

Inspired by the entire Marxist-Leninist tree, people like Stalin, Lenin, Zinoviev, Gorky, Du Bois, Robeson, Ho, Cabral, Nkrumah, Mao, Hoxha, Kurtz, and Lukács, but also those intertwined in the roots or tangled in the branches like Kant, Bentham, Ian James Kidd, Delroy Paulhus, Kevin Williams, and Scott Barry Kaufman to name a few.

This person swears loyalty to both humanity and the planet and gives allegiance to the defenseless and innocent over any state or border. They are pro collective liberation and a world communist republic based on a hybrid of the USSR, the Haudenosaunee, the Nguni Bantu, the Hopi, and the Dayak, with hive-mind democratic centralism immoderately-inordinate enforcement, and anything that fractures imperial unipolarity.

They stand against the corporate-fascist state they reside in and its terror network, both uniparty factions, institutional media, military and police enforcers, and every sectarian division that keeps the global wage-slave class conquered and atomized. Their singular enemy is the ruling class apparatus that seized the state, owns the theater, and has held humanity in manufactured captivity for over a century.

Their singular goal is a unified equitable-egalitarian civilization where the species finally becomes what it was always capable of being. And the planet can finally heal and be protected.

They are American, and that makes their rejection of the American state not betrayal but the most honest reckoning a person can have with the country they were born into. To the state and its loyalists, they are an antithetical American, though the more precise label is post-national antithetical-American revolutionary internationalist. Created by the words, all men are created equal, with rights to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness, and the values installed of chivalry and human decency.

What radicalized this individual, ia not the correct question. The correct question is what kept this person from being who they truly were? And there is an answer for that. America works hard at indoctrinating its citizenry, and for a nation that claims to be so great, why is there a need for that?