June 2026 Original Thought Posted On Social Media
June 30, 2026
When you admitted fascist US foreign policy wouldn't change regardless of which party won, you already conceded the Democrats manage the same terror. Genocide complicity, drone strikes, proxy wars, ICE detention are bipartisan and structural. Calling that harm reduction while Palestinian, Yemeni, and Congolese people are dying is domestic comfort purchased with foreign death.
If you support arming Azov because Russia is the enemy, that's Cold War logic, not progressive politics. The same justification was used for the Mujahideen, Pinochet, the Shah, and death squads in El Salvador. Azov is a documented neo-Nazi formation. The geopolitical excuse doesn't change what they are.
The DNC's own post-election autopsy confirmed what the left said before the election: the party abandoned its coalition, then suppressed the report documenting it. Biden broke the railroad strike and ended the dock worker strike while calling himself the most labor-friendly president in history. He funded ICE at Trump-era highs, continued border wall construction, armed a genocide, and prosecuted people protesting it. He bankrolled neo-Nazis and called it national security. That's not a party drifting right. That's the party.
Blaming non-voters and third party voters for 2024 ignores that third parties were on the ballot and 60% of Americans claimed to want one, then voted corporate anyway and used the third parties' loss as justification. That's a self-fulfilling prophecy you created. Beerbohm, a liberal theorist and Harvard professor, explicitly concludes that when both candidates will commit serious injustices, abstention and revolt are the morally coherent options. He also argued voters have a duty to vote against injustice even when it means being uncomfortable by voting third party to prevent or stop injustice instead of voting in complicity for comfort.
Being anti-Republican is not the same as being on the left. The Democrats represent the same class interests as the Republicans, managed through institutional legitimacy instead of open aggression. They are a center right party and the progressive wing is right of center. Dimitrov called this social fascism nearly a century ago. The record since has only made the case stronger. Every voter who supports the Democratic Party, including those who know it's flawed and vote for it anyway, is not a check on that. They are its guarantee.
Tired of always being right about the GOP and Red MAGA? Turn that same attention to the Democratic Party and Blue MAGA. Civil rights leaders called the Democrats the fox to the Republican wolf, and you're ignoring the fox. Both parties are corporate entities that have merged into a single fascist uniparty with a monopoly over the US government, two cult divisions of the same American corporate machine. Both tell voters they have to vote for their division as long as the other division exists, and both claim only the other division is a cult.
You want to talk about cult of personality? The GOP brings up Trump every chance they get, while now calling LBJ, Carter, Bill Clinton, and even aspects of Al Gore respectable. The Democrats bring up Obama every chance they get and, pre-Epstein files, would also invoke Carter and Clinton, while asking what happened to Eisenhower Republicans, praising Reagan's immigration policies, accepting Dick Cheney's endorsement, and saying Michelle Obama rehabilitated George W. Bush. There's your cult of personality. The left doesn't vote for either party because the left sees both as fascist cults guilty of crimes against humanity and the planet. There is no peace or collective oneness under liberal democracy and capitalism. Only variations of fascism and alternative ways to enslave and violate.
Read this:
https://yaunti3.blogspot.com/2026/06/the-uniparty-merger-in-us-is-complete.html
June 4th, 2026
Two groups that are always causing war and division: colonizers and segregationists. Colonizers want there to only be their way and want to rule everything. Segregationists want everything to stay divided and separate, they oppose the unification of everything including cultures. Both are sectarian, supremacistic, and chauvinistic. And the left should be against all that is against our collective oneness and shared obligatory stewardship of humanity and the planet. If division cannot be abolished, it should be heavily regulated to keep these sectarians from promoting and sustaining a hierarchical us versus them society and human civilization. Like indigenous wisdom says, we, the human species, are one.
June 4th, 2026
To my Dem voting acquaintances:
Foreign policy terror, drone strikes, proxy wars, genocide complicity, arming neo-Nazis in Ukraine (Azov), and endless Middle East entanglements are bipartisan. ICE, border walls, breaking strikes, and corporate-friendly policies continued under Biden at high levels. That's not harm reduction. That's the same machine, staying at brunch when Dems have power.
The DNC's own post-election analysis admitted the party abandoned its working-class base. Both parties serve the same corporate interests, just with different branding: one aggressive, one with institutional cover. Republicans have their cult of personality, nobody denies this. Democrats have theirs (Obama and Carter nostalgia, Cheney endorsements, Bush rehabilitation). And their pod casters and influncers are always on point because it's the indoctrinated they're spreading, ignoring what their side does while pointing out what everyone can see about the other, and their cultists eat it up.
Anti-Republican does not equal Left. Dems are center right, the progressive wing is right of center. The left sees both as wings of the same uniparty: corporate, imperialist, and hostile to actual change. Voting for the lesser evil every cycle just guarantees the evil continues because lesser evil voting is still voting in complicity with injustice for comfortability instead of voting third party or abstaining and revolting.
You're right about the Republicans. Tired of being right about MAGA? Apply that scrutiny to Blue MAGA too. Do what the left does to the Democrats, the area where you're wrong because you see a fundamental difference, even if you occasionally critique them. The Democrats are a fascist cult division of a corporate uniparty, we don't tolerate or associate with them because they're lesser evil just so Americans might stay comfortable. No, we join the reds and smash all fascists, like the reds attempted to do in WW2, while the US was trying to recruit them with programs like operation paperclip before turning on the reds. That fox Malcolm spoke of in the '60s is the entire Democratic party.
June 4th, 2026
Our focus is entirely on human and planet well-being, the survival of the working class, and building a world that actually serves our needs. That is exactly why I see the spontaneous destruction of local infrastructure as a massive failure of strategy and a form of self-sabotage. Everything must be organized and planned, and street law and justice is unacceptable. Lenin called this in his book “Left-Wing” Communism: an Infantile Disorder; and Engels did too in his pamphlet: "The Bakuninists at Work.
We absolutely cannot destroy capitalist distribution centers of basic necessities without having a functional alternative ready to replace them. That's literally responsible resource management and consumption 101 from Marx. When we smash the only grocery store or pharmacy in a marginalized neighborhood, we aren't defeating capitalism. We are just starving our own people, making the vulnerable pay the heaviest price, and deepening our dependency on the system, and turning others against us.
Furthermore, we cannot destroy a community and realistically expect those with the resources or ability to step in and make things better. We cannot expect other wage-slaves to want to step up and participate in mutual aid in those areas. That kind of destruction creates an environment of fear, trauma, and a sense of total resignation. It causes outsiders and insiders alike to view the neighborhood as unhelpable, which drives away the very tools and solidarity we need to rebuild. Those are harmful repellent actions.
The distinction between these actions matters theoretically, not just tactically. Stealing to survive is dialectical materialism in motion, the material conditions produce the behavior, the contradiction between need and access resolves through the only available channel. Destroying the neighborhood, whether it be the only pharmacy in a poor neighborhood or a random house because you do not own it is idealism dressed as radicalism. You are not acting on material conditions, you are acting on a property relation, which means you are still thinking entirely within bourgeois categories, just inverting them. That is not praxis. That is reaction, this is bourgeois opportunism.
True liberation isn't a chaotic, blind reaction born out of rage. True revolution means organizing, building dual power, and taking collective ownership of our spaces so we can protect and feed one another. We improve our environment by seizing and managing our resources, not by burning them to the ground and leaving ourselves with nothing. We need vanguards like the Black and White Panther Parties, not neighborhood lynch mobs with baseball bats and cellphones, calling for emotionally overridden action. Socialism For All on YouTube has a Basic Marxism-Leninism Study Guide. I'm not saying everyone should become experts in theory but I am requesting people read or listen to "Why Socialism," by Einstein, and then that study guide. I wish there was a thorough TL;DR executive summary for one pagers and neurodivergents but even communists have not evolved to be cognitive function friendly for those with conditions that need extra help learning.
June 3rd, 2026
4 or 5 days ago I told my coworker about this subject (NDAA section 224). Today they share video with me to inform me about it. 😅 if you don't vote for their party, they're not really listening to a word you say...
June 3rd, 2026
I block paid dem influncers, coworker sent me a rogue dnc link. Took a few tries before the link offered me a web browser option and I could see the user name..The entire democratic party is the blue maga cult, this includes their influncers and podcasters. This might piss off a few acquaintances but the only people who share Democrat influncers without criticizing them, are the blue cult.
June 2nd, 2026
When anti-imperialism and transparency demand their logical conclusion, libertarians fold back into nationalism and bourgeois opportunism. Theoretical framework is never equipped to follow the logic through because private property and bourgeois sovereignty are always sacred to them. One cannot be anti-imperialist and pro-capital. The contradiction isn't inconvenient, it's terminal. Libertarians of any flavor are pro-capital or lumpenproletariat, and the lumpen libertarians have adopted the predatory epistemology of the owning class as an aspirational identity. The dark triad traits aren't incidental to their ideology, they're the admission requirements, because empathy and altruism are structurally antithetical to its internal logic. The ideology and the hustle are the same epistemology. Three card monte down the block. Individual sovereignty means everyone else is a mark, even in left communes.
June 2nd, 2026
There are loyalists clinging to a vision sold to them and realists disillusioned with material conditions. Loyalists need to read the room instead of the propaganda.
June 2nd, 2026
While some Americans, especially veterans, are upset at "the US empire falling," maybe it's not that "people don't realize how fast it's being destroyed." Maybe it's that things have been bad and getting worse in the US for so long that they no longer care and y'all don't realize it due to blind loyalty to the government and trained allegiance to the flag.
June 2nd, 2026
So let me get this straight. Republican voters are un-American, they're the reason why "our" empire is falling, and Trump is responsible for Gaza, Sudan, Congo, and other locations around the world because people didn't vote for Harris and the Dems.
While Palestine, Congo, and Sudan's latest genocides have been taking place since between 2022/2023, the crimes against humanity have been happening since 1948, the 1990s, and early 2000s.
Truman and Clinton were liberal and centrist and members of the Democratic Party.
Second of all, Biden was president during 2022 and 2023 when the genocides ramped up, and the Harris campaign wanted to make sure at least Israel had a continued right to commit genocide in defense.
Harris condemned Maduro in 2019. In 2024 she called Iran America's greatest enemy, and like Trump, Harris has taken money from AIPAC, while she also accepted endorsement from war criminal Dick Cheney.
Dem voters are worried about Americans being uncomfortable for the next decade, but they were cool with what so many of them called "fascist foreign policy," or were "apathetic to genocide," and wanted the government to stay at brunch while people in and out of the US suffered.
Blue is as evil as Red. MAGA is MAGA, regardless if they're chanting "make america great again," or "what can be, unburdened by what has been."
While the GOP is deregulation and trying to go backwards, the Dems wanted a candidate who said the present and future could be freed by returning to the past/past policy.
I don't care if they're wage slaves, they're unreachable and loyal to the bourgeoisie.
June 2nd, 2026
Dem voters are acting like the US didn't start acting imperialist until after the start of the 21st century under former president Bush. The US had give or take, 200 foreign military bases by 1950 to control the globe, blue cult delusion. And my number might be way under because I cannot remember the exact number.
June 2nd, 2026
I run under the mentality of "we are what we tolerate, guilty by association." That blood doesn't make right, and that family, with exception to minors and married partners, doesn't come with obligation. Whether it's class, culture, or any other sectarian political identity, why do Democrat-voting acquaintances like to complain to me about others, saying one doesn't go against their own group? Did they want the non-Jewish in WW2 or the non-African descent during the mid-1800s to stick together, or were they right to make themselves uncomfortable or endangered to stand up to the Nazis and slave owners? But they prioritize comfortability, especially the Harris voters that openly declared being apathetic to the genocide of Palestinians and only caring about Americans. You know those Dem voters sound like? Rand Paul from 2017, when he was saying "it didn't make sense for" and Republicans don't investigate Republicans. The voting base is just as much a uniparty as the two cults.
June 1st, 2026
This decade, this century, this side of the end of the Cold War, this side of the end of WW2 and many incidents in history since Europeans came to the continent, the US, its allies, and those of European descent who claimed and colonized North America have been on the wrong side of history, have been terrorists, and have violated the world and its inhabitants. When you speak of "we're" regarding the US empire and you are taking the government's side, I am more than likely in opposition to anything you have to say on the subject, and likely have been if it is an ongoing situation. The two cult bases that vote Dem or GOP might take issue with the fact that I do not side with either the Blue or Red MAGA cult decisions and actions separately, refusing to participate in their tribalism or in their uniparty decisions and actions as a national terrorist state, but I do not care. The majority are class traitors anyway. The only thing we have left in common is being of the same species on the same planet, and they are working hard to become traitors to those bonds as well, so we are not allies. And there's a high probability we never will be. Read this slowly: My loyalty is to humanity and the planet, my allegiance is to the innocent and defenseless. My loyalty is not to a flag, constitution, party, government, currency, economy, deity, gender, sex, sexuality, or any other sectarian political identity used to divide people into groups, categories, sects, classifications, etc. and neither is my allegiance. My goal is to see, create, and defend an equitable-egalitarian world, united in our collective oneness and shared obligatory stewardship, so that the planet and everything that lives here in peace can do so for as long as earthly possible. I am an earthling, a human, a hive-mind collectivist, a communist internationalist supporting a global soviet/socialist republic, a secular humanist, an activist-misanthrope seeking the best for all while the toxicity from the resistance continues to condition my opinion and emotion towards others, a wage-slave, neurodivergent, and from ____ region of earth, in that order with other descriptors following.
June 1st, 2026
Ventura's complaining that modern troops are damaging the reputation of the military by talking about actions while on deployment, and saying in his day there , they didn't talk about what day did; is essentially saying the military was always fucked up. And it can be taken that he's upset the people know how bad they are. What happened to Ventura thinking the people should have transparency from the government? And he justifies military personnel profiting off their service. If, and I say if there was ever honor in military actions or service, it definitely didn't make it into the twenty first century. I'll say it again, Libertarians aren't communist.
June 1st, 2026
I have trouble letting things go, which is why this statement came about and i'd like to think it's because I'm not a neurotypical. Varying sources say that between half to 65% of all sources have credibility issues and that the most accurate sources are still at most 70% factual. This explains why every source, including fact checkers, has a plethora of other sources calling them both credible and uncredible. Being wrong three or more times out of every ten inquiries is bad. Humanity is truly in the misinformation age, flooded with rapidly moving waves of information, with studies showing the average human IQ around the globe is between 85 and 93, while the standard average is 100. And that's different from comprehension. People can bitch about how inaccurate AI is but that doesn't make their trusted sources any better, especially government sources, regardless of which geopolitical side they're from. And the second one starts claiming sources and fact checkers as theirs, instead of saying the fact checkers they use, they already show they have a bias, making their information questionable. Now here come the bad faith actors to try and tear this down or to try and twist this into something I didn't say. Take coffee. Cornell University says Coffee is good for your eye sight, while Mount Sinai says it's bad for your eye sight. What I'm getting at is one can find anything they want to support their claims in the internet, so be careful what you accept or dismiss. And I say this because I believe even the most well intentioned people have some level of identity protective cognition when it comes to information gathering.
June 1st, 2026
Between Iran and the US, the phraae "negotiatee a peace deal" is laughable. One side's idea of peace is, "we're allowed to attack when we want, and you cannot return fire." If that side does agree to a peace deal, they're gonna violate it. The side that's been projecting for the last 20 plus years, is not the good guys.
Agreed. I have people I know telling me they're my enemy, adversary, or opposition (because they don't know how to frame it to get me to agree, most likely),And I agree with this person here because I'm not a nationalist, exceptionalist, or patriot. Compared to the US, they're a lesser evil; since they love to try and use that kinda pragmatism.
June 29, 2026
That number just barely exposes the blood on the government's hands over that period and that number has definitely gone up since. If you're gonna include yourself with the government & say, "we're falling," my answer is humanity is safer. If you're gonna bitch about us no longer being comfortable now, my answer is 152+ million chose to vote for neo nazi supporting genociders & karma is making us pay for your support of red or blue MAGA.
June 29, 2026
Dem voters are trying to say 'Zionists and the GOP are the same' in hopes of bringing voters back to the blue MAGA cult. Biden, Fetterman, Torres, and Lander are just a few blue Zionists. Congratulations on outing your preferred party, and no thank you on your invitation back to your blue GOP party. I can never be recruited back into the blue or red flock; once you leave the uniparty matrix, you cannot be plugged back in.
June 28, 2026
You cannot support and enable global terrorists and then try to use that information to bond with those you still support. You cannot do this for any group that brings harm, that you support and expect it to work on those who critically think. You are showing signs of identity protective cognition or stockholm syndrome.
June 28, 2026
Dumbest thing I've heard in a while was during a conversation about zionism, "the historians didn't write it in the bible." This was said by someone who believes in religion and that "only intellectuals should vote," while they have 2 or 3 degrees. The comment is to mind hurting to comment on.
June 28, 2026
After reading over 60 texts before taking a break, I noticed how much fluff and filler was used in theory instead of the authors making sure their points had no room to be interpreted other than how they meant. They left room for people to comprehend and conclude things differently than how they desired, allowing for death of the author. There are no TL;DR executive summaries. Thus, it doesn't matter if people read the theory. I mean, it does, but there's no guarantee readers are going to walk away with the same understanding, and it's the writer's fault. If the points were made clear, they could be applied as needed, regardless of material distance, due to the conditions. Why do you think philosophical-ideological views have branches and sects, because the points were left inferrable or implied instead of directly stated. We need to be direct and to the point, and writers must have discipline before anything else going forward to try and avoid unnecessary divisions later, and eliminate bad faith opportunities, so that the opposition and resistance that does appear can be better fought. Discipline in writing will not completely eliminate bad faith, it will only strip it of cover, so the line must be drawn early, named by its material interest, before it hardens into a permanent fracture.
It's not just a matter of reading. It's a matter of saying what's meant and comprehension of what's written.
June 28, 2026
Although I like options, I understand they're a desire. I'm more about practicality and necessity. Don't come complaining to me about an industry, of twelve for example, losing a single company, or a company going through hardships. I am not a capitalist opportunist; I don't support the status quo, nor do I wish to conserve it. I do not support a for-profit system, nor do I accept the excuse that we need more than one manufacturer. The problem is capitalism and dark triad personalities, not resiliency. What we need are those communists and the light triad personalities who prioritize humanity and the planet in charge of resource management and production, authorized via democratic centralism because there are no great men, which is why authorization runs through democratic centralism, not personality. They must lead the class consciousness and vanguard discipline with a binding global standard. We need equitable-egalitarianism that can only rise with the falling and destruction of current hegemonies to eliminate their sabotage and interference, which history has shown via sanctions, blockades, military actions, and regime changes. We need a world communist republic, not a reformed liberal democracy that uses imperialism and oppression of humanity as tools to exist. No progressive, Democratic Socialist, Social Democrat, or other mixed capitalist variant is going to convince me otherwise. I'm tired of Bourgeoisie Socialists, Conservative Socialists, Patriotic/National Socialists, and Social Fascists trying to maintain and enable the fascists and wage-masters grip on us all. Better to be a freeman struggling and uncomfortable working toward betterment, than a slave who is slightly comfortable with a few privileges granted from the master while working to keep the chains. Something American Democratic Socialists and Social Democrats will never understand because they're right-wing because they don't comprehend or haven't read communist theory including the manifesto.
June 27, 2026
From Hegseth to Isrot to Epstien to Red MAGA to Gaddafi, name the problem Dem voters bitch about and their party's actions and inactions have enabled them, and yet they continue to VBNMW because they're cultist with IPC. There is nothing worse than a party that bankrolls genocide, neo-Nazis, and arrests protesters, especially those protesting genocide. Blue MAGA and Red MAGA are both divisions of MAGA and Maga is fascist even if it's cults are different variations. And MAGA also has a Green, Yellow, Purple, and Chartreuse division. Not all political factions in the US are MAGA but enough are, and they spend their time infighting.
June 25, 2026
Yep, Trump's doing this. Just remember that if Harris and the Democrats didn't throw the election to protect Isrot, this wouldn't be happening. The moderate fascist party has as much blood and dirt on their hands as the neo fascist party.
Both parties have supported actions that amount to genocide. The Democratic voting base is only now paying attention because Harris is no longer in the White House. Democrats supported the Azov Battalion, a group with neo-Nazi elements, because Russia is seen as the enemy. The GOP supports groups like the Oath Keepers, Proud Boys, and Patriot Front because they claim to be concerned about their culture and traditions being replaced. Both parties have also been involved in the arrest of protesters opposing genocide.
Who else throughout history has done this (if they didn't arrest protesters, they supported it)?
Examples include the SS, the Fascist Party of Italy, the Vichy regime, the Ustaše, the Arrow Cross Party, the Iron Guard, the Hlinka Guard, the Blue Division, the Kaminski Brigade, the Ukrainian Auxiliary Police, the British Union of Fascists, the German American Bund, the National Socialist Movement of Chile, the Tokko, the Reformed Government of the Republic of China, and the Indian National Army, among others.
Before everyone i listed a statement that delivered 3 things:
1. A moral argument
2. A historical analogy
3. A critique of bipartisan complicity
The only thing I didn't do was compress it and critically think for you.
June 24, 2026
False consciousness or not, if they seek to harm you, they should not be in your company.
June 23, 2026
There are people out there who try to justify meat eating because plants are alive, confusing their vascular system for a circulatory system like animals; who argue that things like spikes, lectins, and tomatine are proof that plants also have feelings, and since they have to eat to survive, they choose animals over plants. Im new to veganism but it was such an argument made by another, that I heard how asinine their case was that helped push me to give up meat. I didn't want to be hypocritical
June 23, 2026
Every voter is complicit in the actions of those they get elected by enabling and empowering them to control the system that commits or refuses to commit the acts.
June 23, 2026
One cannot be for collective oneness and be pro-sectarian, elevating any group of humanity over the collective. Oneness means meeting everyone where they are and elevating all to their fullest potential simultaneously. Those who hinder this, who entrench current systems of extraction or claim ownership over what should be collectively stewarded, are not "a sect" being singled out. Their opposition to oneness is structural, not incidental, and so they must be opposed, as Marx and Engels said. Opposing them is not sectarianism. It is the substance of collective oneness and our shared, obligatory stewardship. Why does expressing this get me opposed by groups that's members have historically pushed for oneness and stewardship? I'm tired of seeing and hearing bourgeois or colonizing dark triad personalities and philosophical-ideological thought from those that are supposed to be allies. It doesn't matter if one has false consciousness or if one is actually guilty of an act, if they're wrong on a subject, I will not leave them room to try and justify a wrong position.
June 22, 2026
If you support mixed or reformed capitalism, you are an enabler and a moderate fascist just like they said from 1922/23 to 1933/35. Every compromise you're willing to make with the parties you think is fascist, just brings them closer to their goal. Certain terms from the past were wrongfully abolished and this decade we're seeing the consequences of it.
June 22. 2026
You voted for a genocide and azov supporting party to stop a genocide and proud boy supporting party or vice versa.
You support a party that everytime a vote comes up to pass a resolution against socialism or communism, they support it.
You oppose revolutionary parties and call their voters delusional.
You support some type of capitalism.
By your vote and support, you are guilty of being complicit in and enabling of crimes against humanity.
Your last presidential candidate wanted to go back to past policies saying:
make america great again or what can be (the present/future) unburdened by what has been (past law/policy).
Both parties want to regress, claiming it will make things better. Regress what policy to when?
June 21, 2026
Dem and GOP voters both claim to want people to stay informed but then they get upset and don't understand how one can not only resent but hate both their party and themselves. Not realizing that no matter how correct they are about the other party, them and their party's hands are dirty and covered in blood from crossing moral redlines, and are irredeemable. We are what we tolerate, guilty by association; they are guilty of both complicity and enabling harm. There is no excuse, no justification, no defense, they morally betrayed humanity; this is uncontestable and in total sum. This isn't just about the parties but their cultists and the endless acts of moral betrayal. Yes, I can blame them, without them, there are no parties, and no damage from their parties. I am under no obligation to forgive or accept the dark triad, and no one can change that; regardless if it's some Marxist-Leninist or theorists like Eric Beerbohm, theory backs me. They are no different then lumpenproletariat or bourgeoisie opportunists to me, and i'm not going to give opportunity for a knife to end up in my back literally while waiting for their consciousness to no longer be false like communists historically have.
June 19, 2026
My cousin said her sister and she got into an argument over the Green Party, with her sister demanding she vote blue, claiming "the Green Party wasn't a real party." I told her to vote for who she wanted to, and the next time her sister demanded she vote blue, to call her a cultist who doesn't believe in democracy, and to tell her sister that she's trying to suppress her vote no different than the GOP, and that this is the undemocratic style of authoritarianism. I stopped just short of saying her sister had identity protective cognition issues.
June 18, 2026
I am no ally of the empire or it's loyalists, why would anyone with an ounce of humanity be an ally of en evil empire or it's loyalists. Evil always eventually implodes if it isn't taken out externally. And I have only apathy for its loyalists, the same apathy they have for those directly and indirectly genocided by their precious empire. Humanity > any sect of the population. The planet > any sect of the population. No exceptions
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DZc5ggRlM_r/?igsh=YXVoYm9teHhwcHR2
June 18. 2026
Listening to democratic party voters talk about education, while also being loyalists to the hegemony, I can say clearly the educated loyalist and the uneducated loyalist pose equal threats because both have Identity Protective Cognition and will put their loyal before intelligence, reasoning, and logic. Both parties are cults from the top down to the lonely voter flipping burgers or sleeping on the street. Two fascist wings, one corporate body. #BlueMAGAisRedMAGA
June 18, 2026
And North Korea is the bad guy, while the US is the good guy‽ NK has had zero full-scale wars, they've intervened in Vietnam and both the Six-Day War, and Yom Kippur War. The US has intervened militarily over 250 times, and America has been in at least 5 full-scale wars since the end of the Korean War, NK may have committed wrongs against humanity but no where near the level or scale of the US's crimes against humanity. American loyalists need to really look who's been truly part of the Axis of Evil since the end of WW2. Look who picked up the role as leader of the Axis Powers when the Truman Doctrine was delivered to the US congress in '47. I don't care if we're uncomfortable because the empire falls. I care about humanity, finally being safe and comfortable because the evil has fallen. People sustain our evil by voting red or blue maga cult, while Hollywood and the US msm keep up the PR for it. Eventually, the cult makes its own drink the Kool-Aid or surrender their possessions before being burnt in a Church Inferno, and the cult divisions since 9-11 have slowly been turning inward, closing in the walls. I cannot be pro hegemony of a genocidal nation or government, and I have no loyalty or allegiance to such a system or people. I have empathy not apathy for those suffering genocide and I have apathy for a people that would support or attempt to argue excuses and justifications if a foreign policy that would allow it. A nation built on genocide and crimes against humanity doesn't deserve to exist, and it's loyalists don't deserve the comforts or protections it provides. If international law applied the Nuremberg standards uniformly, the US executive and military leadership from Truman forward would have a significant prosecution queue and the US would likely be divided like post WW2 Germany. Sorry, was annoyed and saw this and rage-vented.
June 18, 2026
Better to be a struggling free man than to he a comfortable prisoner or slave.
June 17, 2026
"You're not mentally ill like Republican voters, you're acting stupid claiming democrats aren't working for your best interests." I don't know which party's cult voter base is more delusional. I 100% mean everything I say about both parties and the US.
June 17, 2026
I am not a cultist, I will not mourn the empire. BRICS eroding US hegemony is not a threat, it is overdue correction. No national power deserves permanent dominance, but the American empire has caused more documented suffering than any rival currently positioned to replace it. Multilateralism is a rebranded leash. What I want is a synthesized world socialist republic rooted in Soviet democratic centralism and the collective stewardship frameworks the Haudenosaunee, Nguni Bantu, Hopi, and Dayak never abandoned. Democratic centralism is only dictatorship to those who benefit from the current one.
June 17, 2026
Willing to sacrifice American comfort for human well-being. Supportive of BRICS eroding US hegemony to end imperial terrorism and global suffering. Not a loyalist, not an exceptionalist. I cannot be guilted into mourning the empire, nor manipulated by cultists into embracing the oppressors to ease the American population. I reject the US indoctrination script; I don't want any national hegemony, but using their words, if forced to choose, other powers are 'the lesser evil' compared to the American empire we've all lived struggling under, and what the progressive wing calls 'multilateralism' is little more than theatrical oppression dressed up as cooperation to maintain control. Like the Haudenosaunee, the Nguni Bantu, the Hopi, and the Dayak, I want our collective oneness and shared obligatory stewardship. A synthesized world socialist republic based on the blueprint of the USSR with a pre-capitalist collective framework. Understanding that democratic centralism's only a negative dictatorship to the oppressors, immature, lumpenproletariat, and other dark triad minds.
June 16, 2026
Fascist movements have never been comprised exclusively of the elite class. They draw membership across all classes, which is precisely what makes them effective. The ACP and its MAGA Communism project are fascist formations, and visibly not all members are elite. Neo-Nazi protests this century have been predominantly working class and nobody serious disputes that. Arguing that worker and student nationalists cannot be fascist because they are proletarian is not a theoretical position. It is an analytical failure. Worker councils comprised of fascists are still fascist. Socialist language and structures have always been instrumentally available to fascist movements. The Strasserites did it. MAGA Communism does it. The presence of socialist-sounding demands inside a nationalist uprising with documented fascist leadership elements does not cleanse its character.
The 1956 uprising had documented Arrow Cross members, Horthy-era officers and émigré militants with wartime atrocity convictions operating within it. State Security reports identified specific insurgent groups. Photographs showed Arrow Cross symbols on barricades and armbands. Radio intercepts recorded explicit calls for restoring the pre-1944 order. That is not Soviet propaganda filling a vacuum. That is a documented evidentiary record. The counter-revolutionary faction was fascist by material evidence, not by assertion.
Non-Western communist historians across four independent national traditions reached the same conclusion. Soviet historians Anatoly Shviger, Anna Pankratova and Fedor Potemkin documented it. Chinese historians Hu Sheng and Li Shenzhi documented it. Cuban historian Luis Pavón documented it. Vietnamese historians Văn Tân and Trần Huy Liệu documented it. Korean historians Han Sol-ya and Pak Si-hyong documented it. Four separate national historiographies, none coordinated by the same state apparatus, converging on the same material conclusion carries independent evidentiary weight that cannot be dismissed as a single propaganda line.
I am not treating NATO member nations who ran Operation Paperclip and absorbed Nazi war criminals into Western state infrastructure as credible arbiters of what constitutes fascism in 1956. I am not treating sources from non-Eastern Bloc nations that accepted Nazi refugees as neutral historical authorities. Western anti-fascism was never principled. It was opportunist, applied selectively based on whether fascists were useful or inconvenient to capital. That is not a rhetorical point. It is a structural one. Their credibility on this specific question is disqualified by their own material record.
Yes, the Soviet Union had bourgeois opportunists in its ranks after Stalin, which some characterize as internal contradictions. That is a legitimate critique and I hold it. It does not change what the intervention was responding to. Material function and dominant political direction determine class character, not the most sympathetic faction within a movement. The dominant political direction of the 1956 uprising, measured by its documented leadership, its stated goal of restoring pre-1944 order, and its armed assault on existing socialist state structures, was fascist counter-revolution. That is the conclusion the evidence produces when you apply consistent standards across the board.
June 14, 2026
Who says it's better to be a people colonized then to be a country like Cuba dealing with the US for the past 65 years, and that doesn't who say it's better to be liberated and go through what Cuba's gone through don't understand how things work? That liberationists need to wait for America to stop being colonizers before seeking freedom. I'll tell you who, Democrat voters, especially the progressive wing because Blue MAGA is Blue American Exceptionalism...
June 14, 2026
Who tells voters complaining about not being able to afford basic needs to take a civics test because the GDP is high and they don't understand economics? I can tell you, it's the same people who say they don't care if people can buy basic needs, they only care if the country can buy or trade for resources. There are four philosophical-ideological types that come to mind, Bourgeois Socialists, Conservative Socialists, Bourgeois Opportunists, and Bourgeois Nationalists and all four are right-wing. And why did I use those 4 Ideologies? Because it was mainly those from the progressive wing making these comments, one or two I know personally.
June 10th, 2026
I don't care if i accumulate enemies faster than allies. Doing what's right can be a lonely road, especially when human civilization is morally corrupt. When a movement of the people is against vetting , because it's worried about turning away potential allies that are bourgeois opportunists or lumpenproletariat, true allies are gonna be few and in-between.
June 10th, 2026
Response: Blue Exceptionalists think their going to own Trump with this. Instead, what they showed is for over 200 years, they knew if a president wanted to defy law, there was no true safeguards, no consequences. The liberal party has never cared about law, they care about reputation, power, & comfort. And Blue indigenous should be attacking the US system & gov but indigenous colonizers, imperialists, fascists exist. Where is the calling for global oneness based on the hopi & the Haudenosaunee societies?
June 10th, 2026
Respomse: Maxwell was sentenced in summer of 2022, meaning anyone in government since then, while the Epstein class went free is guilty of protecting that class. Arrest the blue and red for aiding and abetting. Then bring out the guillotine for the epstein class.
June 10th, 2026
Response: Is the country uneducated, without a doubt. Also when a nation promotes individualism the way this country does, they get a population that is dark triad, social-darwinist, kratocratic, & egoistic. And because I know why my acquaintance sent this to me, they want intellectuals to have the power, by intellectuals, they mean sources that support their Soc Dem, Liberal, Conservative Socialist, US exceptionalist, Christian beliefs. An educated person with no morals is as bad as an uneducated person.
June 10th, 2026
In response to the country killing african americans disproportionately:
As long as people are loyal to the Democrats, GOP, US Gov, & US constitution, wanting these things reformed or restored instead of repealed & replaced, problems like this are never gonna be eliminated. As long as we divide humanity/the population into sects, some of those sects/categories are gonna see themselves as superior. Abolish that which divides, & heavily regulate that which cannot be abolished. Recognize our collective oneness & shared obligatory stewardship; equitable-egalitarianism.
June 9th, 2026
People need to come to reality. We are living in the second score of years of the twenty-first century. Group affiliation means little to nothing, especially concerning groups with privilege or power. And groups with power rarely admit error in their acts without force. Between lived experiences and material conditions, it must be the Kool-Aid...
June 9th, 2026
Fentez, and other mainstream establishment sheepdogs may be right about a mainstream party, but their support for the other and the US proves they're still wrong. Every western nation has sheepherders like this.
June 9th, 2026
Co-opting rhetoric, projecting, and shaming when fear mongering doesn't work: that's all the mainstream establishment cultists have to use for recruiting. They are just as predatory.
June 8th, 2026
"If people dispute government source credibility, i'm a trust my sources, and if there's a disagreement between sources over credibility, I'm gonna trust academia. And since all governments manipulate sources in their nation, I'm gonna search the globe for those that corroborate their information. If we've truly reached a point were all sources have a credibility problem, and people go with preference, then we're falling."
To think that government or academic sources are always on the up and up is foolish, especially if you believe parts of history were whitewashed, redacted, or romanticized; and governments tend to promote the narrative of their allies. To deny that we've entered the misinformation age where sources all have credibility problems is either willful ignorance or cognitive dissonance. Which sources people trust now depends on a mix of lived experience, material conditions, preference, and critical thinking ability. For those without identity-protective cognition, trust tends to align with their experiences and circumstances. Those with it accept whatever confirms their existing beliefs, like a cult member. Intellectualism is rapidly free-falling; critical evaluation is collapsing, and the refusal to acknowledge this is proof itself.
June 7th, 2026
You had third party options, you had documented proof that both parties fund wars and desire to fund genocide, support or bankroll nazis, build cages for immigrants, arrest protesters and the homeless, bomb the innocent for the MIC, and you still voted for one of them, so the issue was never stopping evil, it was protecting your comfort while calling it principle, and if you think the people who voted for the other one were too stupid to see past their narrative, look at what narrative you just described your own vote with. After 2024, nobody believes lesser-evil and harm reduction voting is anything but resignation wrapped in defeatism, and comfort voting. I'll say it again, 152 million plus Americans crossed moral redlines in 2024 and lost all respect from at least 3 million Americans. I've been told what I already knew, that that 152 million are so entitled, and don't care what we say and think they're above those who don't agree with them and command the respect of those they view beneath them. They're smarter and know better, and we should be listening to and thanking them for showing the way... GTFO.... They are what we say they are.
June 7th, 2026
Genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, crime of aggression, and transnational organized crimes: the US and both parties have a history of these, with Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama, Biden, and Trump all being guilty of pretty much all five. The level doesn't matter, as these are the top five international crimes. Do not talk to me about the fundamental differences between the two parties, or how bad any other nation is, while trying to claim what you support is the good guys. I don't do tribalism. I stopped following Hasan Piker after leaving the Democratic Party in 2020, but he was correct: 'one of the greatest catastrophes of the 20th century' was the illegal dismantling and fall of the USSR.
June 7th, 2026
When one says their state is a state sponsor of terrorism, both the leader of the Axis Powers and Axis of Evil, and that the two controlling parties are fascist cults, and you have heard them say this, the dumbest thing is to think they are a loyalist to that country because of citizenship or that they are an ally because they criticize your political opposition. To expect an internationalist to be a nationalist and push exceptionalism of the state they condemn is a false consciousness.
June 6th, 2026
Real-time response: My worldview and that of many of my allies represents what many consider a complete departure from traditional American political philosophy by trading individualistic, capitalist, dark triad, and nationalist structures for a disciplined, global collectivism.
True freedom is not the absence of government restraint but the fulfillment of shared stewardship duties, the relationship between the individual and the collective must change entirely. The mentality of human civilization must change from harmful individualism to that of the light triad.
We're humbled and educated enough to logically and analytically conclude society must integrate antitheism, secular humanism, extreme anti sectarianism-identity politics / anything that divides humanity, and strict democratic centralism constructs, where the individual is fundamentally subordinate to the survival and equity of the species, not as oppression, but as the only rational response to a world held hostage by dark triad power structures that call exploitation freedom, terror leadership, and social-darwinism individualism.
We are antithetical-American, incompatible with US loyalists, especially those who vote Democrat because our allegiance is not to any nation, flag, economy, currency, deity, or electoral system. We swear loyalty to humanity and the planet. To vote Democrat is an expression of moderate fascism and American civic faith, affirming the legitimacy of the very state apparatus we identify as a primary vector of global exploitation, coercion, imperialism, and human rights violations. That is not a difference of strategy. It is a difference of foundational loyalty. Democrat voting US loyalists represent the most hypocritical expression of that loyalty because they weaponize the language of justice, equity, and democracy to legitimize and reproduce the very system they claim to oppose, absorbing and neutralizing dissent rather than challenging capital; those loyalists are complicit in the moral wounding and betrayal inflicted by the party for their own comfort.
Ultimately, we don't simply oppose America. Our philosophical-ideological views and analysis of material conditions render the entire American ideological project a historical pathology to be superseded, proposing instead a proportionally timed construction borderless unified global republic, not rushed but not dragged out avoiding the mistakes of both Trotsky and Stalin, based on a hybrid of the USSR, the Haudenosaunee, the Nguni Bantu, the Hopi, and the Dayak and governed by a synthesized Marxism-Leninism, collective reason, dialectical materialism, and an absolute commitment to species-wide well-being over the interests of any sovereign, class, sect, or individual.
June 6th, 2026
Requiring belief in God as a prerequisite for science confuses personal metaphysics with the scientific method, which operates on evidence and testability, not prior belief. Scientists can and do work honestly across a wide range of worldviews. Likewise, dismissing relativity because it doesn’t ‘prove God’ misunderstands its purpose, scientific theories aren’t meant to resolve metaphysical questions, only to model and predict physical phenomena. It's convenient and unproven to claim lack of belief in God is due to error, misunderstanding, and refusal to accept reality.
June 6th, 2026
Rebutting an acquaintance. Telling me that I am a target for being a militant atheist, secular humanist, communist internationalist, and anti-sectarian identity politics advocate. And then following that up with third parties and independents will never win. I don't vote for comfort, those that cross my redlines, or those who morally wound and betray me; and I would sooner rise than vote for your blue fascist party again. Why would I knownly vote for a center right party, where is the logic? Just because you admittedly choose to vote for a party with fascist foreign policy to stay comfortable, and were willing to knowingly vote for a party the left declared fascist to stop what you believed was a fascist, does not mean the left will follow suit. Who in the right mind decides they can live with fascism being inflicted on others so they can be comfortable or to stop another fascist? Voting comes with moral duty to avoid siding with injustice. We are not liberals or social fascists, unlike those who vote Democrat; We are not moderate fascist or their enablers, and we know there is no acceptable medium with injustice, and neither gradualism or incrementalism will stop it. Your lesser-evil harm reduction is nothing more than complicity and resignation wrapped in defeatism. Furthermore, if you're trying to appeal to my sense of self preservation, answer me this: why would I align with a party that calls my philosophical-ideological views godless, conflates it with fascism, who thinks democratic centralism is a brutal dictatorship, and is willing to cross redlines for comfort, such a party is just as much a threat to me. I think I'm clear.
June 6, 2026
European administration, from the moment America declared independence and even before it established itself as a sovereign nation, it has continuously violated and committed crimes against humanity; this isn't a new reality that accompanied Trump. Anyone who believes America was ever honorable is living in a fantasy, thoroughly indoctrinated by the state it blindly defends. I'm sick of people who claim to be humanists and humanitarians cry because the American empire is failing. It's not the empire people care about, it's their comfort.
June 5th, 2026
Democrats aren't a fascist cult, they just say these things...
"Is not voting for a potentially fascist party, worth letting a potentially fascist dictator win?"
"Fascist US Foreign policy isn't gonna change regardless if red or blue wins."
"I'm apathetic to genocide, I only care about Americans."
"We're funding the Azov but the enemy is Russia."
"We should round up all the homeless, putting them in camps to solve homelessness, and arrest them if caught outside the camps without paperwork."
"If we decommodify basic needs, what incentive are people going to have to work?"
"If the 'All men,' label wasn't true, men wouldn't be getting upset. Stop being a little bitch because you're called a sexual predator."
"We must vote blue as long as the GOP exists. They're a bunch of cultists voting MAGA because Trump said so, don't even realize they're voting against their best interests."
"We are falling, and our allies are turning to our enemies. Our reputation is ruined and people are seeing BRICS is providing aid. We are ruined, because people couldn't listen."
Remember, they're fundamental differently than the GOP and definitely not some variation of fascist. We should definitely trust the Dem voters. They clearly don't show any signs of: fascism, cult behavior, sexism, victim blaming, imperialism, American exceptionalism, or elitism. These match between 7-11 of Britt's and Uco's 14 characteristics of fascism and are all statements from Dem Voters. And Dem voters have said much more. Let's be honest, if one votes democrat, they're fascist/fascist like.
June 5th, 2026
I am not joining a big tent with those who are trying to recreate the 2016 Democrat or Republican parties are allowed entry. I am not trying to join a lumpenproletariat party. Nor am I trying to join a soc dem or capitalist reform party. I seek a party with principles that vets.
June 5th, 2026
Eric Beerbohm argued that because representatives act in all citizens' names, non-voters are still morally complicit in state injustice, creating a duty to vote for harm-reducing candidates or, when none exist, to abstain or revolt rather than participate in legitimizing injustice. This dismantles the lesser-evil framework entirely. Voting for either party of the American uniparty is voting for fascism regardless of color, that Blue MAGA operates on the same cult-of-personality and identity-protective cognition as Red MAGA, and that complicity through "harm reduction" voting is still complicity. Third party voting, abstention, and civil organization are the only morally coherent positions.
June 5th, 2026
Nationalism is manufactured captivity. The American state specifically produces loyal subjects through systematic indoctrination, and the fact that it works as effectively as it does on a population that claims to value freedom is itself the indictment. Post-national consciousness isn't radicalization, it's deprogramming. I didn't become something alien, I became what the species is capable of being when the indoctrination fails to hold. The real question was never what turned me into a revolutionary, it was what kept a person with my values, my neurology, and my moral architecture from arriving there sooner, and the answer is the same machine everyone else is still trapped inside.
June 4th, 2026
When an acquaintance is the opposition, sometimes, it's not about challenging everything they said. Sometimes, it's about challenging a specific thing they said. Their analysis maybe correct but their framework is still captive to it.
June 4th, 2026
Dem voters, you're right about the Republicans. That part is easy. What you haven't done is apply the same standard to the party you're defending, and when you do, it doesn't hold up.
Dem voters, you're right about the Republicans. That part is easy. What you haven't done is apply the same standard to the party you're defending, and when you do, it doesn't hold up.
When you admitted fascist US foreign policy wouldn't change regardless of which party won, you already conceded the Democrats manage the same terror. Genocide complicity, drone strikes, proxy wars, ICE detention are bipartisan and structural. Calling that harm reduction while Palestinian, Yemeni, and Congolese people are dying is domestic comfort purchased with foreign death.
If you support arming Azov because Russia is the enemy, that's Cold War logic, not progressive politics. The same justification was used for the Mujahideen, Pinochet, the Shah, and death squads in El Salvador. Azov is a documented neo-Nazi formation. The geopolitical excuse doesn't change what they are.
The DNC's own post-election autopsy confirmed what the left said before the election: the party abandoned its coalition, then suppressed the report documenting it. Biden broke the railroad strike and ended the dock worker strike while calling himself the most labor-friendly president in history. He funded ICE at Trump-era highs, continued border wall construction, armed a genocide, and prosecuted people protesting it. He bankrolled neo-Nazis and called it national security. That's not a party drifting right. That's the party.
Blaming non-voters and third party voters for 2024 ignores that third parties were on the ballot and 60% of Americans claimed to want one, then voted corporate anyway and used the third parties' loss as justification. That's a self-fulfilling prophecy you created. Beerbohm, a liberal theorist and Harvard professor, explicitly concludes that when both candidates will commit serious injustices, abstention and revolt are the morally coherent options. He also argued voters have a duty to vote against injustice even when it means being uncomfortable by voting third party to prevent or stop injustice instead of voting in complicity for comfort.
Being anti-Republican is not the same as being on the left. The Democrats represent the same class interests as the Republicans, managed through institutional legitimacy instead of open aggression. They are a center right party and the progressive wing is right of center. Dimitrov called this social fascism nearly a century ago. The record since has only made the case stronger. Every voter who supports the Democratic Party, including those who know it's flawed and vote for it anyway, is not a check on that. They are its guarantee.
Tired of always being right about the GOP and Red MAGA? Turn that same attention to the Democratic Party and Blue MAGA. Civil rights leaders called the Democrats the fox to the Republican wolf, and you're ignoring the fox. Both parties are corporate entities that have merged into a single fascist uniparty with a monopoly over the US government, two cult divisions of the same American corporate machine. Both tell voters they have to vote for their division as long as the other division exists, and both claim only the other division is a cult.
You want to talk about cult of personality? The GOP brings up Trump every chance they get, while now calling LBJ, Carter, Bill Clinton, and even aspects of Al Gore respectable. The Democrats bring up Obama every chance they get and, pre-Epstein files, would also invoke Carter and Clinton, while asking what happened to Eisenhower Republicans, praising Reagan's immigration policies, accepting Dick Cheney's endorsement, and saying Michelle Obama rehabilitated George W. Bush. There's your cult of personality. The left doesn't vote for either party because the left sees both as fascist cults guilty of crimes against humanity and the planet. There is no peace or collective oneness under liberal democracy and capitalism. Only variations of fascism and alternative ways to enslave and violate.
Read this:
https://yaunti3.blogspot.com/2026/06/the-uniparty-merger-in-us-is-complete.html
June 4th, 2026
Two groups that are always causing war and division: colonizers and segregationists. Colonizers want there to only be their way and want to rule everything. Segregationists want everything to stay divided and separate, they oppose the unification of everything including cultures. Both are sectarian, supremacistic, and chauvinistic. And the left should be against all that is against our collective oneness and shared obligatory stewardship of humanity and the planet. If division cannot be abolished, it should be heavily regulated to keep these sectarians from promoting and sustaining a hierarchical us versus them society and human civilization. Like indigenous wisdom says, we, the human species, are one.
June 4th, 2026
To my Dem voting acquaintances:
Foreign policy terror, drone strikes, proxy wars, genocide complicity, arming neo-Nazis in Ukraine (Azov), and endless Middle East entanglements are bipartisan. ICE, border walls, breaking strikes, and corporate-friendly policies continued under Biden at high levels. That's not harm reduction. That's the same machine, staying at brunch when Dems have power.
The DNC's own post-election analysis admitted the party abandoned its working-class base. Both parties serve the same corporate interests, just with different branding: one aggressive, one with institutional cover. Republicans have their cult of personality, nobody denies this. Democrats have theirs (Obama and Carter nostalgia, Cheney endorsements, Bush rehabilitation). And their pod casters and influncers are always on point because it's the indoctrinated they're spreading, ignoring what their side does while pointing out what everyone can see about the other, and their cultists eat it up.
Anti-Republican does not equal Left. Dems are center right, the progressive wing is right of center. The left sees both as wings of the same uniparty: corporate, imperialist, and hostile to actual change. Voting for the lesser evil every cycle just guarantees the evil continues because lesser evil voting is still voting in complicity with injustice for comfortability instead of voting third party or abstaining and revolting.
You're right about the Republicans. Tired of being right about MAGA? Apply that scrutiny to Blue MAGA too. Do what the left does to the Democrats, the area where you're wrong because you see a fundamental difference, even if you occasionally critique them. The Democrats are a fascist cult division of a corporate uniparty, we don't tolerate or associate with them because they're lesser evil just so Americans might stay comfortable. No, we join the reds and smash all fascists, like the reds attempted to do in WW2, while the US was trying to recruit them with programs like operation paperclip before turning on the reds. That fox Malcolm spoke of in the '60s is the entire Democratic party.
June 4th, 2026
Our focus is entirely on human and planet well-being, the survival of the working class, and building a world that actually serves our needs. That is exactly why I see the spontaneous destruction of local infrastructure as a massive failure of strategy and a form of self-sabotage. Everything must be organized and planned, and street law and justice is unacceptable. Lenin called this in his book “Left-Wing” Communism: an Infantile Disorder; and Engels did too in his pamphlet: "The Bakuninists at Work.
We absolutely cannot destroy capitalist distribution centers of basic necessities without having a functional alternative ready to replace them. That's literally responsible resource management and consumption 101 from Marx. When we smash the only grocery store or pharmacy in a marginalized neighborhood, we aren't defeating capitalism. We are just starving our own people, making the vulnerable pay the heaviest price, and deepening our dependency on the system, and turning others against us.
Furthermore, we cannot destroy a community and realistically expect those with the resources or ability to step in and make things better. We cannot expect other wage-slaves to want to step up and participate in mutual aid in those areas. That kind of destruction creates an environment of fear, trauma, and a sense of total resignation. It causes outsiders and insiders alike to view the neighborhood as unhelpable, which drives away the very tools and solidarity we need to rebuild. Those are harmful repellent actions.
The distinction between these actions matters theoretically, not just tactically. Stealing to survive is dialectical materialism in motion, the material conditions produce the behavior, the contradiction between need and access resolves through the only available channel. Destroying the neighborhood, whether it be the only pharmacy in a poor neighborhood or a random house because you do not own it is idealism dressed as radicalism. You are not acting on material conditions, you are acting on a property relation, which means you are still thinking entirely within bourgeois categories, just inverting them. That is not praxis. That is reaction, this is bourgeois opportunism.
True liberation isn't a chaotic, blind reaction born out of rage. True revolution means organizing, building dual power, and taking collective ownership of our spaces so we can protect and feed one another. We improve our environment by seizing and managing our resources, not by burning them to the ground and leaving ourselves with nothing. We need vanguards like the Black and White Panther Parties, not neighborhood lynch mobs with baseball bats and cellphones, calling for emotionally overridden action. Socialism For All on YouTube has a Basic Marxism-Leninism Study Guide. I'm not saying everyone should become experts in theory but I am requesting people read or listen to "Why Socialism," by Einstein, and then that study guide. I wish there was a thorough TL;DR executive summary for one pagers and neurodivergents but even communists have not evolved to be cognitive function friendly for those with conditions that need extra help learning.
June 3rd, 2026
4 or 5 days ago I told my coworker about this subject (NDAA section 224). Today they share video with me to inform me about it. 😅 if you don't vote for their party, they're not really listening to a word you say...
June 3rd, 2026
I block paid dem influncers, coworker sent me a rogue dnc link. Took a few tries before the link offered me a web browser option and I could see the user name..The entire democratic party is the blue maga cult, this includes their influncers and podcasters. This might piss off a few acquaintances but the only people who share Democrat influncers without criticizing them, are the blue cult.
June 2nd, 2026
When anti-imperialism and transparency demand their logical conclusion, libertarians fold back into nationalism and bourgeois opportunism. Theoretical framework is never equipped to follow the logic through because private property and bourgeois sovereignty are always sacred to them. One cannot be anti-imperialist and pro-capital. The contradiction isn't inconvenient, it's terminal. Libertarians of any flavor are pro-capital or lumpenproletariat, and the lumpen libertarians have adopted the predatory epistemology of the owning class as an aspirational identity. The dark triad traits aren't incidental to their ideology, they're the admission requirements, because empathy and altruism are structurally antithetical to its internal logic. The ideology and the hustle are the same epistemology. Three card monte down the block. Individual sovereignty means everyone else is a mark, even in left communes.
June 2nd, 2026
There are loyalists clinging to a vision sold to them and realists disillusioned with material conditions. Loyalists need to read the room instead of the propaganda.
June 2nd, 2026
While some Americans, especially veterans, are upset at "the US empire falling," maybe it's not that "people don't realize how fast it's being destroyed." Maybe it's that things have been bad and getting worse in the US for so long that they no longer care and y'all don't realize it due to blind loyalty to the government and trained allegiance to the flag.
June 2nd, 2026
So let me get this straight. Republican voters are un-American, they're the reason why "our" empire is falling, and Trump is responsible for Gaza, Sudan, Congo, and other locations around the world because people didn't vote for Harris and the Dems.
While Palestine, Congo, and Sudan's latest genocides have been taking place since between 2022/2023, the crimes against humanity have been happening since 1948, the 1990s, and early 2000s.
Truman and Clinton were liberal and centrist and members of the Democratic Party.
Second of all, Biden was president during 2022 and 2023 when the genocides ramped up, and the Harris campaign wanted to make sure at least Israel had a continued right to commit genocide in defense.
Harris condemned Maduro in 2019. In 2024 she called Iran America's greatest enemy, and like Trump, Harris has taken money from AIPAC, while she also accepted endorsement from war criminal Dick Cheney.
Dem voters are worried about Americans being uncomfortable for the next decade, but they were cool with what so many of them called "fascist foreign policy," or were "apathetic to genocide," and wanted the government to stay at brunch while people in and out of the US suffered.
Blue is as evil as Red. MAGA is MAGA, regardless if they're chanting "make america great again," or "what can be, unburdened by what has been."
While the GOP is deregulation and trying to go backwards, the Dems wanted a candidate who said the present and future could be freed by returning to the past/past policy.
I don't care if they're wage slaves, they're unreachable and loyal to the bourgeoisie.
June 2nd, 2026
Dem voters are acting like the US didn't start acting imperialist until after the start of the 21st century under former president Bush. The US had give or take, 200 foreign military bases by 1950 to control the globe, blue cult delusion. And my number might be way under because I cannot remember the exact number.
June 2nd, 2026
I run under the mentality of "we are what we tolerate, guilty by association." That blood doesn't make right, and that family, with exception to minors and married partners, doesn't come with obligation. Whether it's class, culture, or any other sectarian political identity, why do Democrat-voting acquaintances like to complain to me about others, saying one doesn't go against their own group? Did they want the non-Jewish in WW2 or the non-African descent during the mid-1800s to stick together, or were they right to make themselves uncomfortable or endangered to stand up to the Nazis and slave owners? But they prioritize comfortability, especially the Harris voters that openly declared being apathetic to the genocide of Palestinians and only caring about Americans. You know those Dem voters sound like? Rand Paul from 2017, when he was saying "it didn't make sense for" and Republicans don't investigate Republicans. The voting base is just as much a uniparty as the two cults.
June 1st, 2026
This decade, this century, this side of the end of the Cold War, this side of the end of WW2 and many incidents in history since Europeans came to the continent, the US, its allies, and those of European descent who claimed and colonized North America have been on the wrong side of history, have been terrorists, and have violated the world and its inhabitants. When you speak of "we're" regarding the US empire and you are taking the government's side, I am more than likely in opposition to anything you have to say on the subject, and likely have been if it is an ongoing situation. The two cult bases that vote Dem or GOP might take issue with the fact that I do not side with either the Blue or Red MAGA cult decisions and actions separately, refusing to participate in their tribalism or in their uniparty decisions and actions as a national terrorist state, but I do not care. The majority are class traitors anyway. The only thing we have left in common is being of the same species on the same planet, and they are working hard to become traitors to those bonds as well, so we are not allies. And there's a high probability we never will be. Read this slowly: My loyalty is to humanity and the planet, my allegiance is to the innocent and defenseless. My loyalty is not to a flag, constitution, party, government, currency, economy, deity, gender, sex, sexuality, or any other sectarian political identity used to divide people into groups, categories, sects, classifications, etc. and neither is my allegiance. My goal is to see, create, and defend an equitable-egalitarian world, united in our collective oneness and shared obligatory stewardship, so that the planet and everything that lives here in peace can do so for as long as earthly possible. I am an earthling, a human, a hive-mind collectivist, a communist internationalist supporting a global soviet/socialist republic, a secular humanist, an activist-misanthrope seeking the best for all while the toxicity from the resistance continues to condition my opinion and emotion towards others, a wage-slave, neurodivergent, and from ____ region of earth, in that order with other descriptors following.
June 1st, 2026
Ventura's complaining that modern troops are damaging the reputation of the military by talking about actions while on deployment, and saying in his day there , they didn't talk about what day did; is essentially saying the military was always fucked up. And it can be taken that he's upset the people know how bad they are. What happened to Ventura thinking the people should have transparency from the government? And he justifies military personnel profiting off their service. If, and I say if there was ever honor in military actions or service, it definitely didn't make it into the twenty first century. I'll say it again, Libertarians aren't communist.
June 1st, 2026
I have trouble letting things go, which is why this statement came about and i'd like to think it's because I'm not a neurotypical. Varying sources say that between half to 65% of all sources have credibility issues and that the most accurate sources are still at most 70% factual. This explains why every source, including fact checkers, has a plethora of other sources calling them both credible and uncredible. Being wrong three or more times out of every ten inquiries is bad. Humanity is truly in the misinformation age, flooded with rapidly moving waves of information, with studies showing the average human IQ around the globe is between 85 and 93, while the standard average is 100. And that's different from comprehension. People can bitch about how inaccurate AI is but that doesn't make their trusted sources any better, especially government sources, regardless of which geopolitical side they're from. And the second one starts claiming sources and fact checkers as theirs, instead of saying the fact checkers they use, they already show they have a bias, making their information questionable. Now here come the bad faith actors to try and tear this down or to try and twist this into something I didn't say. Take coffee. Cornell University says Coffee is good for your eye sight, while Mount Sinai says it's bad for your eye sight. What I'm getting at is one can find anything they want to support their claims in the internet, so be careful what you accept or dismiss. And I say this because I believe even the most well intentioned people have some level of identity protective cognition when it comes to information gathering.
June 1st, 2026
Between Iran and the US, the phraae "negotiatee a peace deal" is laughable. One side's idea of peace is, "we're allowed to attack when we want, and you cannot return fire." If that side does agree to a peace deal, they're gonna violate it. The side that's been projecting for the last 20 plus years, is not the good guys.
Comments
Post a Comment