September 2026 Original Thought Posted On Social Media
September 22, 2026
Establishment voters, if you claim to be to be a socialist but you come across as Restorationist, exceptionalist, nationalist, nationalist, primacist, you're a Nat Soc, Pat Soc, Bourgeoisie Soc, Conservative Soc, or MAGA Communist. The common denominator is they're all right-wing ideologies that are gateways to fascism. Every Blue voter voted for a Genocider, and every Red voter voted for a Rapist. Both are across moral red lines. There is no coming back. Guilt and responsibility from actions and indirect actions still exist, regardless of group or individual. Enablers and moderates of harmful philosophical-ideological thought exist. Refusing to vet and hold accountable people is not pragmatism, it's defeatism, no different than lesser-evil fucking voting. All big tents do is allow evil to corrupt the innocent. History proves it: aligning with those of False Consciousness lets False Consciousness creep in among Correct Consciousness. With or without a popular front, evil would rise. There's a difference between working with those of different ideologies and deciding that the thought behind Operation Paperclip was acceptable. And in the US, where we have the Green Party, the Libertarian Party, the Democrats, the GOP, and others, the talk of the US being a two-party, first-past-the-post system is a fraudulent cop-out and not accepted.
September 15, 2026
Trying to justify bigotry, and prejudice because you don't know which of a group has certain traits, so you apply the stereotype to the entire group, is not a justification for bigotry and prejudice. It doesn't give you a pass. It makes you a bigot and nothing more, and trying to shame those you're bigoted or prejudice towards is victim shaming. Enough of the sectarian identity politics, if majority of a group statistically adheres to what you're saying fine, otherwise cut it the fuck out. 🤦♂️
September 13, 2026
Both have genocidal foreign policy, and Trump via the NDAA will also gave an additional $400 mil to the UK. People on my side of the moral redline don't vote for or support parties that genocide the vulnerable, innocent, and defenseless, acting like they're a nazi level threat. Instead they risk losing, being uncomfortable, and possibly more to protect the innocent and defenseless. The theater now from some Dems and their cult over Palestine, isn't bought. We're allowed to vet & hold accountable
September 13, 2026
Dem and GOP voters both claim to vote lesser evil. Yet the nationalists and US exceptionalists cannot understand that concept for internationalists that support BRICS over the US and Western imperialist hegemony. Internationalists see BRICS as less or not harmful in comparison.
September 13, 2026
I hear GOP voting acquaintances opposing Russia but wanting compensation from Ukraine for cash and arms. I hear Dem voting acquaintances opposing Russia and talking about them and their alliances like they're still the USSR and I bite my tongue 90% of the time because it's either not worth it or I'm in a place I cannot speak up.
I don’t support the Ukraine or Russia. I don’t support the Azov either. I have said from the beginning that I support the people of Ukraine, the LPR/LNR, DPR/DNR, and CSDF or Crimean self defense force. Ukraine v Russia is a proxy war for the US and Nato, which is why when a ceasefire was on the table during the first week, Ukraine was told to refuse, why Ukraine has a blank check for NATO/US funding, and why Nato wants us to believe the voluntary foreign fighting force in Ukraine isn’t NATO. It's also how the US and Biden in 2024 justified lifting the ban on Arming the Azov Neo-nazis. I will never not see Ukraine as an oppressive force against eastern Ukraine after the 2014 US regime change in Ukraine. And I will never see Russia as an opportunist using the same encroachment strategy NATO has since Bush agreed it wouldn't expand east. I oppose military conscription, banning a gender of the population from leaving, abducting civilians and forcing them to the front lines, and integrating nazi brigades into the military, nazis who had been committing human rights violations against separatists and non nationalists/loyalists since 2014. And because I side with the Ukrainian people, and those Ukrainians in the east, the LPR,DNR, and CSDF, and because those Ukrainians have made alliances, and oppose things I oppose, indirectly that puts me on a side in the Ukraine v Russia conflict, and even more at odds with both US nationalists and exceptionalists who already take issue with me for being an eco and secular communist internationalist.
September 12, 2026
Real political divide isn't left versus right but the capitalist imperial class versus anti-capitalist-imperial class; nationalists, exceptionalists, reactionaries, reformists, and social darwinist opportunists serve the same wage masters. Opposition to communist states, anti-capitalist organizations and to anti-imperialism isn't independent reasoning but a false consciousness fueled by workers infected with an embourgeoisement fever and dark triad personality.
September 11, 2026
I stopped trying to make people feel comfortable in a room I walked in about 16 years ago but I learned the lesson of personal security and self preservation over 40 years ago.
September 11, 2026
Sexual predators, those guilty of crimes against humanity, terrorist states, white supremacists and fascists regardless if they're foreign or domestic, and environmental and human rights violating corporations, red and blue maga voters support both and then claim the superficial differences between the donkey and elephant are fundamental, expecting us to not trust out eyes and ears.
Since the 2016 primaries to now, Juanita Broaddrick, E. Jean Carroll, Tara Reade, Jayson Boebert, Paula Jones, and Christine Blasey Ford, were all blown off by the voters of the two parties, claiming it was a smear campaign by the other side or it was in the past. In 2024, Dem voters said they didn't care about genocide, were apathetic to those being genocided, and only cared about Americans and American rights. In 2026, GOP voters are coming out and saying they don't care that Trump diddled kids, they only care about him passing laws they want so that they can stay comfortable. On top of that both parties are still united bipartisanly against Communism and socialism, both overwhelmingly take money from Israeli pacts, and both are in support of corporations over the environment or humanity. Like I have said, over 152 million Americans are class, species, and planetary traitors; their differences are superficial and negligible, and they're both groups are either indoctrinated nationalist/exceptionalist cultists or dark triad individuals pushing social darwinistic ideologies, and yes, to want a mixed or partial capitalist economy counts as a form of social darwinistic because you're arguing to keep a system of wage slavery and human rights violations.
September 11, 2026
Marxism-Leninism theory demands vetting revolutionary movements and members; it upholds solidarity with genuine anti-imperialist and national-liberation struggles, but support is always conditional based on class analysis of the movement’s leadership, program, base, material dependence, political consciousness, and discipline. A movement funded or directed by an equal or greater oppressive power or functions as its proxy, only serves strengthens the enemy of the workers. Just because the popular front made allies of those who enabled fascists, doesn't mean enablers and opportunists are blindly supported and aligned with now.
September 10, 2026
If you're an American and not on the side of the DPR and LPR, then it's only fair to assume at home you support the proud boys, oath keepers, and 3 percenters, because you tolerate neo nazis in Ukraine to justify your cult fed hatred of Russia instead of opposing both the Ukrainian and Russian governments. The left doesn’t support the Azov or Nato puppets. And no nation that steals its citizens sovereignty by using military conscription, locking the male population in its borders, and abducting male citizens to force them to kill or be killed, deserves to exist. The left supports liberation movements and non forced military service, it does not support enslaved nations that force its population to fight for a government against invaders because military conscription turns citizens into slaves and the left doesn’t support slavery, nor does it believe nazi ideologies fade once nazi units get absorbed into the national military.
September 8, 2026
Abdul El-Sayed, Zohran Mamdani, Bernie Sanders, AOC, and the DSA are dirigistes pushing a form of either social liberal, conservative socialist, or bourgeoisie socialist dirigisme, and from 1922 to 1934 Zinoviev, and the comintern had another name for these "liberal minded" ideologies; and if we fall for them, were gonna end up like Luxemburg, Liebknecht, Leviné, Jogiches, and Egelhofer because at the end if the day they're a moderate form of what they enable. Stop pushing for a popular front with them, stop helping the Democrats, and stop coddling moderate fascists. This isn't class isolation, it's refusing to align with class traitors who are closer to the ACP than the left and prop up the wage master and Epstein classes. They're worse then trying to align with Left and Ego Coms. We're not rejecting tactical alignments, we're rejecting tolerating and associating with to avoid becoming guilty and part of the moderate wing with them. Don't believe us, stop feeding into Browderism, go scratch them and see what bleeds, while they seek to reform the decaying capitalism crushing our existence. The mistake of ending the opposition to and aligning with them in the past has led to the rise of fascists like the LDP, Brothers of Italy, AfD, Defensores de la Patria, GOP, and Likud, the modern day PNF, NSDAP, FET, NYKP or Tōhōkai. The left has suffered through liquidationism out of fear of creating a new Reich, since the popular front was formed to take on Hitler; anyone who can't see the overreach, patterns and connect the dots might already have been absorbed by the rachet effect, soaked through by pressure valve for capital or actually shares in their philosophical-ideological thought.
September 8, 2026
I want to share my thoughts on voting but using opsec and persec tell me that it would be harmful to do so online. So I guess all I can say is it's a tool, and i'll leave it to others imagination of how tools can be used.
September 8th, 2026
Working men, wage slaves, have no country. My ancestry comes from Europe, but I have zero connection to the land or the cultures of the Danes, Anglo-Celtic, Swabians, and other peoples of my ancestry; it would be foolish to claim otherwise. We're supposed to evolve, not cling to the past and outdated ways and territory claims. In the modern era, we should all be secular cosmopolitans and proletarian internationalists instead of clinging to sectarian political identities due to the effects of embourgeoisement. We are Earthling, we are human, we are one; stop fighting over man made labels, ways, and traits that divide us. I wish they had succeeded in making the world soviet/communist republic, I really do; maybe then we would embrace our collective oneness and understand our shared obligatory stewardship duties. ML Communism Internationalism is the final form of humanism, can we evolve already? I'm tired of living among chauvinists, millionaires, embarrassed millionaires, and both dark triad personalities and ideologies.
September 7, 2026
Don’t judge workers by lifestyle standards that assume they have spare time, money, health, or control over their lives. Movements should offer accessible participation, reserve higher commitments for willing organizers, and build support rather than shame people for exhaustion, disability, caregiving, limited study, or imperfect choices.
https://yaunti3.blogspot.com/2026/09/being-revolutionary-is-not-checklist-of.html
September 6. 2026
Over the past 5 and a half years, both Dem and GOP voters had called climate scientists alarmist. When I would say that the Paris climate accord didn't go far enough and remind people that scientists had a clock in NYC that gave us to 2030 to fix things, I was called an alarmist by people who called climate science a hoax or pushed for slow profitable incremental changes over the ne t 25 years; both saying changes couldn't be forced onto others. This is why scientists and some activists sound totalitarian
September 6, 2026
Seeing people try to justify support for western imperialism, the US hegemony, isrot, and the Azov in Ukraine by pointing to the rise of far right ideological groups around the world and saying these groups lead to praising Putin, Kim, China, and BRICS, is political theater psyops to keep you on their plantations. Wake the fuck up and think about their messaging, they are the far right.
September 6, 2026
I'm not defending liberals. Over seventy-three percent of conservatives say they have unmet mental health needs, and conservatives point to information claiming over 30% of liberal women admit to having a mental health condition. People having unmet or undiagnosed mental health issues is a bigger deal than who openly admits it, end the stigma because owning the admission isn't the win, admitting to and treating the illnesses, conditions and their symptoms like identity protective cognition or sectarianism is.
September 6, 2026
Some people spend years watching problems get worse, then get upset when someone points out that outrage without organization changes nothing. It is easy to demand others feel something, harder to actually build the structure that would make feeling something useful. A person who has been given the same evidence and the same options for years, and still clings to the idea that their side just needs better leadership, is not being persuaded by more urgency, they are choosing comfort and false consciousness, choosing the lie over consistency. At some point continuing to perform distress for people who have already shown they will not move forward, only backward and sideways, stops being principled and starts being theater, and I would rather stay clear headed than keep auditioning emotions for an audience that already decided the answer years ago. Not all of us have the GABA or the patience to keep dealing with people like this, and for many, our conditions and life experiences have turned us into activist misanthropes. I am doing the best I can being neurodivergent, a secular Marxist humanist, an international Marxist Leninist, and a light triad tankie. I cannot move people who have decided they only have two choices, circle the bug zapper like they are in orbit, or head into the light. I do not have the constitution for it, and I am not going to perform for them while they try to get me to join them in their self inflicting behavior. I will not walk on stage and pick back up the Kool-Aid I already tossed.
September 5, 2026
When i left the Democrats in 2020, I believed the party was guilty of:
1. The rachet effect
2. Stealing from third parties and independents and rigging primary elections
3. NeoLiberal corl Corporatocracy
4. Showing signs of being a cult
- And their voting base was right of center (purple), bringing up past and present Democrat politicians when they had nothing to do with the conversation or switching to whataboutism and defeatism to protect the party.
The party and its voters made me realize they had convinced me to vote against my interests, to view ideologies and nations i agreed with as evil and taboo, and to consider frenemies as allies, to which i felt morally wounded and betrayed when leaving.
Since then they're guilty of:
5. Banking rolling genocide
6. Arming the Azov neo nazis
7. Arresting homeless and protesters
8. Ended rail and dockworkers strikes
9. Said they were a big tent with the GOP
10. Used the national guard to police areas like the NYC transit.
11. Being owned by a foreign government
12. Increased military and ice funding against the people's wishes
- And their voting base said they were apathetic to genocide, justified arming the azov neo nazis due to russia, and insisted and evened threatened people to vote blue no matter what, Showing the party could commit any crime and they wouldn't care as long as they were comfortable and the gop lost.
They've crossed several moral redlines and so have their supporters by continuing to vote for them. They are the blue MAGA, moderate fascist, US exceptionalist, cult division of the US corporate uniparty, and the equivalent to if not worse than the party that killed Luxemburg and Liebknecht. At this point, the only difference i see in the party bases is their level of fascism, that includes the social fascist DSA Dems.
September 5, 2026
If you, as an American, are going to complain about the shit happening in the US or around the world because of the US, and you're gonna vote Democrat or Republican instead of getting organized with and voting for a revolutionary vanguard party, then I have nothing to say to you, because you're part of the problem.
September 4, 2026
Why do I have disdain for the Democrats and their voters? After the second strike, I realized that they had convinced me to vote against my own interests by making me believe they were fighting for the people and that third parties were inconsequential. That realization felt like a moral wound and a betrayal. When I spoke with Democratic voters (the Democratic base), their reactions seemed complicit and displayed identity-protective cognition. With the third strike, both the party and its voters crossed moral red lines from which there is no return.
Democrats rigging primaries, see Wilding v. Democratic National Committee Services Corp., along with voters openly discussing the need for bipartisanship while attacking people on the left and threatening to vote Republican if Sanders won, was the first strike.
Democrats continuing to rig primaries, suing to keep third parties off the ballot, and changing polling, grassroot, donor and debate qualifying thresholds, and blue states changing ballot access laws, while their voters kept the same energy and tried to insist that Democrats owned the left’s vote, was the second strike.
A Democratic governor arresting homeless people and protesters; the party taking money from AIPAC and bankrolling both Azov and a genocide; Biden breaking the rail and dockworkers’ strikes; and the party’s vice-presidential candidate Govenor Walz openly admitting that the party was a big tent with GOP members, simultaneously calling the GOP fascist, while its voters admitted they were apathetic about genocide and cared only about Americans, constituted the third strike.
Why do I think Democrats are complicit and negligible in comparison with the GOP? Because they not only do some of the same things as the GOP, but they also cross moral red lines. Their voters practice whataboutism, refuse to support alternatives by saying that nothing can be done, and bring up Obama and other Democratic politicians, even when the situation does not call for it, to boast about and praise them. They insist that, no matter what Democrats do, they are the best option available and cannot be abandoned.
Of the approximately 236 million Americans eligible to vote in 2024, I am philosophically, ideologically, and ethically an alien or migrant among at least 152 million people who voted, plus approximately 12.5 million eligible voters who chose not to vote. Those 236 million people were adults; the remaining 104 million of the roughly 340 million people living in the United States in 2024 consisted largely of children and noncitizens, and basing it off of the percentage of eligible voters I am not compatible with, i'm probably incompatible with an additional 72 million of the population, making approximately 236 million Americans that I have to keep my head down because I don't belong around. I don't belong in rural America but I also don't belong in urban or suburban America, I have to find pockets in between urban and suburban areas I belong, and there's even fewer pockets in between suburban and rural areas.
September 3, 2026
Dem voters, do not agree on 90 percent of things, let me explain. People who find the consequences of a problem undesirable, rather than finding the problem's continued existence itself unacceptable, will generally pursue harm reduction: they seek to lessen the severity, frequency, or consequences of the problem and may ultimately accept its continued existence as a pragmatic reality. People who find a problem unacceptable seek to abolish the problem itself and will accept nothing less as the ultimate objective. From that perspective, merely making an unacceptable condition less harmful does not constitute solving it; it constitutes managing or mitigating something that should not exist in the first place. This distinction is especially apparent in politics. Some people may regard lesser-evil voting or incremental reform as undesirable but pragmatic: they accept an imperfect outcome because they believe it produces less harm than the alternatives. Others regard those same choices as unacceptable and therefore defeatist, because they believe accepting the lesser evil, rather than rejecting both unacceptable options and pursuing structural change, perpetuates the very conditions they seek to abolish. The difference, therefore, is not necessarily whether people recognize that a problem exists. It is whether they consider the continued existence of that problem acceptable or unacceptable, and consequently whether compromise and harm reduction are viewed as pragmatic necessities or as defeatist acceptance of an injustice that should instead be abolished. So if you vote Democrat because you are voting for the lesser-evil, there is no way we agree on 90% of things, and I'm strongly wondering if you're too far gone to be considered a frenemy whom I can have a temporary alliance with or if your character is completely unacceptable because I need to know if we simply have irreconcilable disagreement or if we stand on the opposite side of moral red lines.
September 3, 2026
Real time response: Help you understand why myself and others won't vote Democrat? Blue Dog, Third Way, Liberal, Soc Dems a.k.a. US Dem Socs, and Sewer Socialists, listening to them all speak, none of them want to abolish capitalism, just reform how it's managed. An anti-capitalist voter would be wasting their vote, voting for such a party. The party actively sides against it's Soc Dem and DSA members and has voted bipartisanly to support: Crucial Communism Teaching Act (H.R. 5349), Denouncing the horrors of socialism (H.Con.Res. 9), and H.Res. 1490, Condemning socialism in all its forms. And then, the party lifted the ban on funding the Azov, a neo nazi group, and actively defended and supported a genocide, crossing two moral red lines, not to mention a single EO and an OPM regulation from Biden were the only safe guard the Dems enacted to stop fascism, after telling us Trump was a fascist since 2016. Why would any anti-capitalist vote in complicity with injustice and against their best interests and vote for the Democratic Party like other defeatists when pragmatic third parties and independent candidate options exist, so that we don’t have to be complicit in or cross over moral redlines, even if we have to sacrifice comfort to vote for what's right‽ I mean we're not all nationalists or US exceptionalists, some of us are humanists or internationalists. While I think the question is asked in bad faith, I still have to answer it in order not to concede or lose the debate.
September 3, 2026
In 2024 the Democrats and Republicans ran on seven key things, and states under their control had already enacted some of them, and you bitch about the government enacting them:
Either: "Make America Great Again" (a regressive slogan), or "What can be, unburdened by what has been" (also a regressive slogan, saying: free the present and future by returning to the past).
Either: "We pledge to you that we will root out the communists, Marxists, fascists, and the radical left thugs that live like vermin within the confines of our country that lie and steal and cheat on elections." (conflating communism and fascism and saying it must be fought) or “It is clear from John Kelly's words that Donald Trump is someone who, I quote, 'certainly falls into the general definition of fascist,'" (says fascism must be fought, calls Trump a fascist, and whole platform is centered around "Never Trump.")
Either: "Together, over the next few years, we're going to make our military stronger, tougher, faster, fiercer, and more powerful than it has ever been before," or "The strongest, most lethal fighting force in the world." (Both say they're going to increase military spending)
Either: "I will double the resources for the Department of Justice to track down transnational cartels, to take action to stop the flow of fentanyl into our country," (while the Nat. Guard was ordered by Hochul to police the NYC subway) or "If I thought things were getting out of control, I would have no problem using the military, per se. We have to have safety in our country. We have to have law and order in our country. And whichever gets us there. But I think the National Guard will do the job." (One says they're gonna make the police twice as strong, the other says they're gonna use military to strengthen the police)
Either: "I will take further action to keep the border closed between ports of entry. Those who cross our borders unlawfully will be apprehended, removed, and barred from reentering for five years," or "I will seal the border, stop the invasion of people pouring through our border, and send Joe Biden's illegal aliens back home where they belong." (Both are saying they're going to close the open access points on the border and deport illegals)
Either: "I will focus on cutting needless bureaucracy and unnecessary regulatory red tape, and encouraging innovative technologies, while protecting consumers and creating a stable business environment with consistent and transparent rules of the road," or "I will create a government efficiency commission tasked with conducting a complete financial and performance audit of the entire federal government, and making recommendations for drastic reforms. We need to do it. Can't go on the way we are now." (One says they're gonna deregulated which means cutting regulations enforcement spending and the other says they're gonna cut spend straight out).
Either: "Let me be clear, I will always stand up for Israel’s right to defend itself, and I will always ensure Israel has the ability to defend itself." or " (Trump) fully supports Israel's right to defend itself and eliminate the terrorist threat."Campaign spokesperson Karoline Leavitt (They both called genocide of a people without a standing military an act of defense)
From immigration, to law enforcement, to program cuts and deregulation, to foreign policy and military action, to supports genocide, the two parties literally told everybody, using different rhetoric, that they were going to get to the same destination. People are complaining about what the government is doing, and how elected officials of what is supposed to be the opposition party are acting bipartisan to help achieve those actions committed by the government. The difference in complaints from Dem and GOP voters is the speed at which our shackles are being tightened, not that we're being shackled by a system of government designed to keep us enslaved.
We told you the the parties were negligible, and you told us to stop taking your words literally, while you took the other party's words literally. We told you their policies harmed humanity as a whole, and you said you were apathetic to humanity's plight and only cared about Americans. Americans are not nor have they ever been more important than then humanity, especially those being genocided; American rights or comfort is not more important than the freedoms or rights to live of non Americans. We see things that are unacceptable as things that must be abolished, you see them as inevitable, we see things that must be enforced, you see those situations as nothing we can do. Because of that what we see as superficial differences, you call fundamental.
Defeatism leads to complicity not pragmatism, the fox is as dangerous as the wolf, vote third party or abstain and get organized; stop empowering the wage masters and overlords of the Uniparty and start paying attention to political theater and bad script writing. You are being tried in the court of public opinion since we the people, at the moment do not control the courts. Stop arguing against a weaker version of our position than the one we actually stated, and understand unlike you, we are not nationalists or US exceptionalists, we are internationalists and care about the world to where you care only about America. We will continue to point out your similarities and share the "I Told You SOs!"
September 2, 2026
I don't want to hear from Dem voters, especially my acquaintances, how bad Israel and the IDF is, or have them show me videos of Israel and the IDF being immoral species traitors, Dems had 15 months to stop it but were more concerned with staying at brunch and collecting AIPAC, Jstreet, and other Israeli money sources, and Dem voters were more concerned about staying comfortable and beating gop voters then not voting for genociders.
September 2, 2026
We've been calling for schools and universities to be made public for over 25 years. Democrats and their voters are worried about the GOP making everything private and the wealthy abusing private school vouchers. If private schools and universities were abolished and safeguards were put into place, they wouldn't be losing their minds, while Democratic politicians commit to the political theater script.
September 2, 2026
Both Dem and GOP voting acquaintances seem to think if there sources, that you're getting your information from Facebook or tabloid, misinformation sources. I'll share with them the WSWS, France24, New Arab, High North News, the South China Morning Post, Lee Camp, Will Talkz, or Sabby Sabs, to name a few and they'll send me shit like Dean Whithers, Mehdi Hasan, Tim Pool, or Greg Gutfeld, not realizing they're sending blue or red cult propaganda. But when I say something about it, they look like i'm speaking to foreign language.
September 2, 2026
When one has a strong conviction to their philosophical-ideological principles and thought, and they notice an epistemic and moral problem with not only the government and systems but organizations and population, how can one be expected not to be an activist-misanthrope under those material conditions and physical reality? This is why the science of psychology and psychiatry must be used in conjunction with dialectical materialism.
September 2, 2026
When one views protesting as pageantry, voting as a rarely working tool, mutual aid as a band-aid, and uprisings, riots, and revolt as necessary but not gonna happen in their lifetime, why is there objection to one only consuming headlines, video shorts, single posts, and tl;dr executive summaries if stuff, especially when one views, information is nothing that they can do with, and existing in the current population makes one slowly believe that the only purpose to existing is to trudge through life while consuming in producing finite resources?
September 2, 2026
Kyle Kulinsky said, "Americans truly haven’t reckoned with the fact that about 30% of the population in our country are the moral equivalent of nazis." Well, what kyles fails to add is: an additional 30% to 40% are either fascist or moderate fascists.
September 2, 2026
The difference between Iran's and Qatar's mentality, one finds peace in staying oppressed and the other finds it in the idea of being liberated from global oppressors.
September 2, 2026
Since Dem voters keep questioning why I hold voters accountable for the actions of their elected officials, which is ironic because they blame the GOP voters for Trump, Liberal Harvard Professor Eric Beerbohm wrote theory about voter ethics, he says you don't vote in complicity with injustice, instead you vote for the uncomfortable options. And although he is against abstaining, he implied that if the only options were to side with injustice, which a party committing genocide and one wanting to would qualify for the most extreme case, voters should abstaining and organise to uprise or revolt. Now pre election day, a few third parties had a path to 270, so the "uncomfortable," options were there but both dem and gop voters voted for comfortable genocide over uncomfortable genocide, claiming pragmatism while the left called it defeatism. Maybe one day they'll get moral redlines, and why some are irreconcilable once violated...And the how much blame falls to the voters, that depends on the severity of the actions done by the politicians and whether or whether or not there were just candidates running and whether or not they chose to vote for complicit candidates instead of taking alternative options and actions. I truly be in the saying, "we are whatvwe tolerate, guilty by association;" and they refuse to walk away from the status quo parties due to their conservative or conservative centrist/liberal/socialist philosophical- ideology.
September 2, 2026
Never forget: Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500° F, and steel loses structural integrity at 1000° F, structural meaning weight bearing, losing half its strength at 1100°. Per SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering. I need both unedited film and unredacted information before I'll believe the build was taken down by a demo team, regardless if I believe the government directly or indirectly brought the building down.
September 2, 2026
Insulting your political opposition's appearance is tribalism, and using imagery that has nothing to do with the subject to attack your opposition or make yourself look better, according to a G.H. Brenner MD DFAPA, is called BRODA. Stop fighting sectarian identity politics and start fighting for the working class or human species.
September 2, 2026
During Trump's first administration Dem voters were like, "you are what you tolerate, guilty by association," at Republicans, who would deny they weren't racist?Just because the party was. Then the Democrats start getting called out for doing shit on the list of points and traits they were sharing, and they got away from that stance under Biden. Now that Trump is president again, they're trying to be hypocritical and say only the gop are fascist, pedophiles, neo nazi supporters, and genocidal. Na-Nah! Your politicians are in the Epstein list, your parties backed genocide and neo nazis, your parties did fascist shit, and you stand by your parties. You don't stand with a party that doesn't fascist shit, set that has members accused of being pedos or predators, you don't stand by a party that has or supports nazis, and you don't stand with a party committing or supporting a genocide against a non nazi threat level to humanity. Regardless if it's an elected position or just a voter, affiliating with or supporting either the Dems or the GOP makes you what they are.
September 2, 2026
When advancements are discontinued, bought and either price raised or discontinued, or their inventors are unalived to prevent the advancements from getting out to the public, when it happens under your party's and governent's watch or they collect money from those who benefits it, and you still stand by and support them while calling out how advancements and their creators were handled, you are showing signs of having at least a momentary cognitive function issue, and should seek help.
September 2, 2026
The guy is evil but he went to get into the ethical side of that reasoning and the other guy said that was silly conversation, which is, whether something is silly doesn't determine if something is correct or not; comedians make hilarious jokes all the time that are factually correct statements, and the comedian still has those conversations. While I agree against non 1940s nazi level threats (i.e. the innocent, vulnerable, and defenseless) that it's evil and wrong, the conversation for why it's immoral and unethical needs to be had. A divided cannot be had and humanity cannot progress if it is not willing to engage in discussions over what is and what isn't moral or ethical with reasoning and logic to back up their argument. So i do think while the guy wqs correct about it being silly, he simultaneously conceded his position by refusing to give a real answer to it, instead he just offered an unserious nonchalant response and the other person was correct to call him on it and say the conversation is over because in the conversation or debate, the guy refused to give a logical and reasonable defense for his stance, running the risk of coming off haughty in the process. And yes, I believe violence is always the last option on the table and must be proportional in response to the opposition threat level.
September 2, 2026
If they're gonna make such arguments, counter arguments must be made to counter false consciousness instead of just calling arguments silly and expecting people to blindly agree because you're educated or are considered an expert in a field and said so. We watched and continue to watch for conversations, safeguards to be attempted, and real active opposition to be had, and not just a simple, 'if you just vote for our party, that's all that's needed to be done, our politicians can stay at brunch, legislating isn't actually needed."
September 2, 2026
So one question or statement I constantly get from communists is: "Communists say communism isn't about morals, but people see stuff all the time they disagree with and don't write political ideologies around that disagreement, so why do communist disagreements matter? Why does ending exploitation and oppression by capitalists matter? Why does seizing the means of production and making a more equal society matter? And before you say people should be treated better, that doesn't explain why it matters that people should be treated better, and people needing to be treated better doesn't explain why Marx wrote his ideology. Why does any of it matter to you, to communists? If it's not about morals, a sense of things being right or wrong, and feeling the need to prove it and show there's a better way, then what is the underlying reason for why it matters?" Now, I might not have it worded exactly as they say it, but it's damn near close to what they say verbatim. And yet I see communists online saying it's not about morals, it's scientific, and that moralizing communism will alienate people away from it. Well, if we're not doing it because we feel things are wrong and evidence shows there's a better way, better being a matter of opinion, then why the hell are we communists? I mean, all communists want the best for workers, the best for humanity, and I hope the best for the planet. I have no issue with people using science, reason, and logic to explain why communism makes sense, but the underlying reason communist principles and opposition to other philosophical-ideological thought matters, we should be able to honestly admit why it matters to us as individuals. Somewhere underneath the historical materialism we believe exploitation is bad, human suffering under preventable conditions is bad, class struggle is bad, and a world without it is better. Moral epistemology is the foundation of dialectical materialism and commu
Establishment voters, if you claim to be to be a socialist but you come across as Restorationist, exceptionalist, nationalist, nationalist, primacist, you're a Nat Soc, Pat Soc, Bourgeoisie Soc, Conservative Soc, or MAGA Communist. The common denominator is they're all right-wing ideologies that are gateways to fascism. Every Blue voter voted for a Genocider, and every Red voter voted for a Rapist. Both are across moral red lines. There is no coming back. Guilt and responsibility from actions and indirect actions still exist, regardless of group or individual. Enablers and moderates of harmful philosophical-ideological thought exist. Refusing to vet and hold accountable people is not pragmatism, it's defeatism, no different than lesser-evil fucking voting. All big tents do is allow evil to corrupt the innocent. History proves it: aligning with those of False Consciousness lets False Consciousness creep in among Correct Consciousness. With or without a popular front, evil would rise. There's a difference between working with those of different ideologies and deciding that the thought behind Operation Paperclip was acceptable. And in the US, where we have the Green Party, the Libertarian Party, the Democrats, the GOP, and others, the talk of the US being a two-party, first-past-the-post system is a fraudulent cop-out and not accepted.
September 15, 2026
Trying to justify bigotry, and prejudice because you don't know which of a group has certain traits, so you apply the stereotype to the entire group, is not a justification for bigotry and prejudice. It doesn't give you a pass. It makes you a bigot and nothing more, and trying to shame those you're bigoted or prejudice towards is victim shaming. Enough of the sectarian identity politics, if majority of a group statistically adheres to what you're saying fine, otherwise cut it the fuck out. 🤦♂️
September 13, 2026
Both have genocidal foreign policy, and Trump via the NDAA will also gave an additional $400 mil to the UK. People on my side of the moral redline don't vote for or support parties that genocide the vulnerable, innocent, and defenseless, acting like they're a nazi level threat. Instead they risk losing, being uncomfortable, and possibly more to protect the innocent and defenseless. The theater now from some Dems and their cult over Palestine, isn't bought. We're allowed to vet & hold accountable
September 13, 2026
Dem and GOP voters both claim to vote lesser evil. Yet the nationalists and US exceptionalists cannot understand that concept for internationalists that support BRICS over the US and Western imperialist hegemony. Internationalists see BRICS as less or not harmful in comparison.
September 13, 2026
I hear GOP voting acquaintances opposing Russia but wanting compensation from Ukraine for cash and arms. I hear Dem voting acquaintances opposing Russia and talking about them and their alliances like they're still the USSR and I bite my tongue 90% of the time because it's either not worth it or I'm in a place I cannot speak up.
I don’t support the Ukraine or Russia. I don’t support the Azov either. I have said from the beginning that I support the people of Ukraine, the LPR/LNR, DPR/DNR, and CSDF or Crimean self defense force. Ukraine v Russia is a proxy war for the US and Nato, which is why when a ceasefire was on the table during the first week, Ukraine was told to refuse, why Ukraine has a blank check for NATO/US funding, and why Nato wants us to believe the voluntary foreign fighting force in Ukraine isn’t NATO. It's also how the US and Biden in 2024 justified lifting the ban on Arming the Azov Neo-nazis. I will never not see Ukraine as an oppressive force against eastern Ukraine after the 2014 US regime change in Ukraine. And I will never see Russia as an opportunist using the same encroachment strategy NATO has since Bush agreed it wouldn't expand east. I oppose military conscription, banning a gender of the population from leaving, abducting civilians and forcing them to the front lines, and integrating nazi brigades into the military, nazis who had been committing human rights violations against separatists and non nationalists/loyalists since 2014. And because I side with the Ukrainian people, and those Ukrainians in the east, the LPR,DNR, and CSDF, and because those Ukrainians have made alliances, and oppose things I oppose, indirectly that puts me on a side in the Ukraine v Russia conflict, and even more at odds with both US nationalists and exceptionalists who already take issue with me for being an eco and secular communist internationalist.
September 12, 2026
Real political divide isn't left versus right but the capitalist imperial class versus anti-capitalist-imperial class; nationalists, exceptionalists, reactionaries, reformists, and social darwinist opportunists serve the same wage masters. Opposition to communist states, anti-capitalist organizations and to anti-imperialism isn't independent reasoning but a false consciousness fueled by workers infected with an embourgeoisement fever and dark triad personality.
September 11, 2026
I stopped trying to make people feel comfortable in a room I walked in about 16 years ago but I learned the lesson of personal security and self preservation over 40 years ago.
September 11, 2026
Sexual predators, those guilty of crimes against humanity, terrorist states, white supremacists and fascists regardless if they're foreign or domestic, and environmental and human rights violating corporations, red and blue maga voters support both and then claim the superficial differences between the donkey and elephant are fundamental, expecting us to not trust out eyes and ears.
Since the 2016 primaries to now, Juanita Broaddrick, E. Jean Carroll, Tara Reade, Jayson Boebert, Paula Jones, and Christine Blasey Ford, were all blown off by the voters of the two parties, claiming it was a smear campaign by the other side or it was in the past. In 2024, Dem voters said they didn't care about genocide, were apathetic to those being genocided, and only cared about Americans and American rights. In 2026, GOP voters are coming out and saying they don't care that Trump diddled kids, they only care about him passing laws they want so that they can stay comfortable. On top of that both parties are still united bipartisanly against Communism and socialism, both overwhelmingly take money from Israeli pacts, and both are in support of corporations over the environment or humanity. Like I have said, over 152 million Americans are class, species, and planetary traitors; their differences are superficial and negligible, and they're both groups are either indoctrinated nationalist/exceptionalist cultists or dark triad individuals pushing social darwinistic ideologies, and yes, to want a mixed or partial capitalist economy counts as a form of social darwinistic because you're arguing to keep a system of wage slavery and human rights violations.
September 11, 2026
Marxism-Leninism theory demands vetting revolutionary movements and members; it upholds solidarity with genuine anti-imperialist and national-liberation struggles, but support is always conditional based on class analysis of the movement’s leadership, program, base, material dependence, political consciousness, and discipline. A movement funded or directed by an equal or greater oppressive power or functions as its proxy, only serves strengthens the enemy of the workers. Just because the popular front made allies of those who enabled fascists, doesn't mean enablers and opportunists are blindly supported and aligned with now.
September 10, 2026
If you're an American and not on the side of the DPR and LPR, then it's only fair to assume at home you support the proud boys, oath keepers, and 3 percenters, because you tolerate neo nazis in Ukraine to justify your cult fed hatred of Russia instead of opposing both the Ukrainian and Russian governments. The left doesn’t support the Azov or Nato puppets. And no nation that steals its citizens sovereignty by using military conscription, locking the male population in its borders, and abducting male citizens to force them to kill or be killed, deserves to exist. The left supports liberation movements and non forced military service, it does not support enslaved nations that force its population to fight for a government against invaders because military conscription turns citizens into slaves and the left doesn’t support slavery, nor does it believe nazi ideologies fade once nazi units get absorbed into the national military.
September 8, 2026
Abdul El-Sayed, Zohran Mamdani, Bernie Sanders, AOC, and the DSA are dirigistes pushing a form of either social liberal, conservative socialist, or bourgeoisie socialist dirigisme, and from 1922 to 1934 Zinoviev, and the comintern had another name for these "liberal minded" ideologies; and if we fall for them, were gonna end up like Luxemburg, Liebknecht, Leviné, Jogiches, and Egelhofer because at the end if the day they're a moderate form of what they enable. Stop pushing for a popular front with them, stop helping the Democrats, and stop coddling moderate fascists. This isn't class isolation, it's refusing to align with class traitors who are closer to the ACP than the left and prop up the wage master and Epstein classes. They're worse then trying to align with Left and Ego Coms. We're not rejecting tactical alignments, we're rejecting tolerating and associating with to avoid becoming guilty and part of the moderate wing with them. Don't believe us, stop feeding into Browderism, go scratch them and see what bleeds, while they seek to reform the decaying capitalism crushing our existence. The mistake of ending the opposition to and aligning with them in the past has led to the rise of fascists like the LDP, Brothers of Italy, AfD, Defensores de la Patria, GOP, and Likud, the modern day PNF, NSDAP, FET, NYKP or Tōhōkai. The left has suffered through liquidationism out of fear of creating a new Reich, since the popular front was formed to take on Hitler; anyone who can't see the overreach, patterns and connect the dots might already have been absorbed by the rachet effect, soaked through by pressure valve for capital or actually shares in their philosophical-ideological thought.
September 8, 2026
I want to share my thoughts on voting but using opsec and persec tell me that it would be harmful to do so online. So I guess all I can say is it's a tool, and i'll leave it to others imagination of how tools can be used.
September 8th, 2026
Working men, wage slaves, have no country. My ancestry comes from Europe, but I have zero connection to the land or the cultures of the Danes, Anglo-Celtic, Swabians, and other peoples of my ancestry; it would be foolish to claim otherwise. We're supposed to evolve, not cling to the past and outdated ways and territory claims. In the modern era, we should all be secular cosmopolitans and proletarian internationalists instead of clinging to sectarian political identities due to the effects of embourgeoisement. We are Earthling, we are human, we are one; stop fighting over man made labels, ways, and traits that divide us. I wish they had succeeded in making the world soviet/communist republic, I really do; maybe then we would embrace our collective oneness and understand our shared obligatory stewardship duties. ML Communism Internationalism is the final form of humanism, can we evolve already? I'm tired of living among chauvinists, millionaires, embarrassed millionaires, and both dark triad personalities and ideologies.
September 7, 2026
Don’t judge workers by lifestyle standards that assume they have spare time, money, health, or control over their lives. Movements should offer accessible participation, reserve higher commitments for willing organizers, and build support rather than shame people for exhaustion, disability, caregiving, limited study, or imperfect choices.
https://yaunti3.blogspot.com/2026/09/being-revolutionary-is-not-checklist-of.html
September 6. 2026
Over the past 5 and a half years, both Dem and GOP voters had called climate scientists alarmist. When I would say that the Paris climate accord didn't go far enough and remind people that scientists had a clock in NYC that gave us to 2030 to fix things, I was called an alarmist by people who called climate science a hoax or pushed for slow profitable incremental changes over the ne t 25 years; both saying changes couldn't be forced onto others. This is why scientists and some activists sound totalitarian
September 6, 2026
Seeing people try to justify support for western imperialism, the US hegemony, isrot, and the Azov in Ukraine by pointing to the rise of far right ideological groups around the world and saying these groups lead to praising Putin, Kim, China, and BRICS, is political theater psyops to keep you on their plantations. Wake the fuck up and think about their messaging, they are the far right.
September 6, 2026
I'm not defending liberals. Over seventy-three percent of conservatives say they have unmet mental health needs, and conservatives point to information claiming over 30% of liberal women admit to having a mental health condition. People having unmet or undiagnosed mental health issues is a bigger deal than who openly admits it, end the stigma because owning the admission isn't the win, admitting to and treating the illnesses, conditions and their symptoms like identity protective cognition or sectarianism is.
September 6, 2026
Some people spend years watching problems get worse, then get upset when someone points out that outrage without organization changes nothing. It is easy to demand others feel something, harder to actually build the structure that would make feeling something useful. A person who has been given the same evidence and the same options for years, and still clings to the idea that their side just needs better leadership, is not being persuaded by more urgency, they are choosing comfort and false consciousness, choosing the lie over consistency. At some point continuing to perform distress for people who have already shown they will not move forward, only backward and sideways, stops being principled and starts being theater, and I would rather stay clear headed than keep auditioning emotions for an audience that already decided the answer years ago. Not all of us have the GABA or the patience to keep dealing with people like this, and for many, our conditions and life experiences have turned us into activist misanthropes. I am doing the best I can being neurodivergent, a secular Marxist humanist, an international Marxist Leninist, and a light triad tankie. I cannot move people who have decided they only have two choices, circle the bug zapper like they are in orbit, or head into the light. I do not have the constitution for it, and I am not going to perform for them while they try to get me to join them in their self inflicting behavior. I will not walk on stage and pick back up the Kool-Aid I already tossed.
September 5, 2026
When i left the Democrats in 2020, I believed the party was guilty of:
1. The rachet effect
2. Stealing from third parties and independents and rigging primary elections
3. NeoLiberal corl Corporatocracy
4. Showing signs of being a cult
- And their voting base was right of center (purple), bringing up past and present Democrat politicians when they had nothing to do with the conversation or switching to whataboutism and defeatism to protect the party.
The party and its voters made me realize they had convinced me to vote against my interests, to view ideologies and nations i agreed with as evil and taboo, and to consider frenemies as allies, to which i felt morally wounded and betrayed when leaving.
Since then they're guilty of:
5. Banking rolling genocide
6. Arming the Azov neo nazis
7. Arresting homeless and protesters
8. Ended rail and dockworkers strikes
9. Said they were a big tent with the GOP
10. Used the national guard to police areas like the NYC transit.
11. Being owned by a foreign government
12. Increased military and ice funding against the people's wishes
- And their voting base said they were apathetic to genocide, justified arming the azov neo nazis due to russia, and insisted and evened threatened people to vote blue no matter what, Showing the party could commit any crime and they wouldn't care as long as they were comfortable and the gop lost.
They've crossed several moral redlines and so have their supporters by continuing to vote for them. They are the blue MAGA, moderate fascist, US exceptionalist, cult division of the US corporate uniparty, and the equivalent to if not worse than the party that killed Luxemburg and Liebknecht. At this point, the only difference i see in the party bases is their level of fascism, that includes the social fascist DSA Dems.
September 5, 2026
If you, as an American, are going to complain about the shit happening in the US or around the world because of the US, and you're gonna vote Democrat or Republican instead of getting organized with and voting for a revolutionary vanguard party, then I have nothing to say to you, because you're part of the problem.
September 4, 2026
Why do I have disdain for the Democrats and their voters? After the second strike, I realized that they had convinced me to vote against my own interests by making me believe they were fighting for the people and that third parties were inconsequential. That realization felt like a moral wound and a betrayal. When I spoke with Democratic voters (the Democratic base), their reactions seemed complicit and displayed identity-protective cognition. With the third strike, both the party and its voters crossed moral red lines from which there is no return.
Democrats rigging primaries, see Wilding v. Democratic National Committee Services Corp., along with voters openly discussing the need for bipartisanship while attacking people on the left and threatening to vote Republican if Sanders won, was the first strike.
Democrats continuing to rig primaries, suing to keep third parties off the ballot, and changing polling, grassroot, donor and debate qualifying thresholds, and blue states changing ballot access laws, while their voters kept the same energy and tried to insist that Democrats owned the left’s vote, was the second strike.
A Democratic governor arresting homeless people and protesters; the party taking money from AIPAC and bankrolling both Azov and a genocide; Biden breaking the rail and dockworkers’ strikes; and the party’s vice-presidential candidate Govenor Walz openly admitting that the party was a big tent with GOP members, simultaneously calling the GOP fascist, while its voters admitted they were apathetic about genocide and cared only about Americans, constituted the third strike.
Why do I think Democrats are complicit and negligible in comparison with the GOP? Because they not only do some of the same things as the GOP, but they also cross moral red lines. Their voters practice whataboutism, refuse to support alternatives by saying that nothing can be done, and bring up Obama and other Democratic politicians, even when the situation does not call for it, to boast about and praise them. They insist that, no matter what Democrats do, they are the best option available and cannot be abandoned.
Of the approximately 236 million Americans eligible to vote in 2024, I am philosophically, ideologically, and ethically an alien or migrant among at least 152 million people who voted, plus approximately 12.5 million eligible voters who chose not to vote. Those 236 million people were adults; the remaining 104 million of the roughly 340 million people living in the United States in 2024 consisted largely of children and noncitizens, and basing it off of the percentage of eligible voters I am not compatible with, i'm probably incompatible with an additional 72 million of the population, making approximately 236 million Americans that I have to keep my head down because I don't belong around. I don't belong in rural America but I also don't belong in urban or suburban America, I have to find pockets in between urban and suburban areas I belong, and there's even fewer pockets in between suburban and rural areas.
September 3, 2026
Dem voters, do not agree on 90 percent of things, let me explain. People who find the consequences of a problem undesirable, rather than finding the problem's continued existence itself unacceptable, will generally pursue harm reduction: they seek to lessen the severity, frequency, or consequences of the problem and may ultimately accept its continued existence as a pragmatic reality. People who find a problem unacceptable seek to abolish the problem itself and will accept nothing less as the ultimate objective. From that perspective, merely making an unacceptable condition less harmful does not constitute solving it; it constitutes managing or mitigating something that should not exist in the first place. This distinction is especially apparent in politics. Some people may regard lesser-evil voting or incremental reform as undesirable but pragmatic: they accept an imperfect outcome because they believe it produces less harm than the alternatives. Others regard those same choices as unacceptable and therefore defeatist, because they believe accepting the lesser evil, rather than rejecting both unacceptable options and pursuing structural change, perpetuates the very conditions they seek to abolish. The difference, therefore, is not necessarily whether people recognize that a problem exists. It is whether they consider the continued existence of that problem acceptable or unacceptable, and consequently whether compromise and harm reduction are viewed as pragmatic necessities or as defeatist acceptance of an injustice that should instead be abolished. So if you vote Democrat because you are voting for the lesser-evil, there is no way we agree on 90% of things, and I'm strongly wondering if you're too far gone to be considered a frenemy whom I can have a temporary alliance with or if your character is completely unacceptable because I need to know if we simply have irreconcilable disagreement or if we stand on the opposite side of moral red lines.
September 3, 2026
Real time response: Help you understand why myself and others won't vote Democrat? Blue Dog, Third Way, Liberal, Soc Dems a.k.a. US Dem Socs, and Sewer Socialists, listening to them all speak, none of them want to abolish capitalism, just reform how it's managed. An anti-capitalist voter would be wasting their vote, voting for such a party. The party actively sides against it's Soc Dem and DSA members and has voted bipartisanly to support: Crucial Communism Teaching Act (H.R. 5349), Denouncing the horrors of socialism (H.Con.Res. 9), and H.Res. 1490, Condemning socialism in all its forms. And then, the party lifted the ban on funding the Azov, a neo nazi group, and actively defended and supported a genocide, crossing two moral red lines, not to mention a single EO and an OPM regulation from Biden were the only safe guard the Dems enacted to stop fascism, after telling us Trump was a fascist since 2016. Why would any anti-capitalist vote in complicity with injustice and against their best interests and vote for the Democratic Party like other defeatists when pragmatic third parties and independent candidate options exist, so that we don’t have to be complicit in or cross over moral redlines, even if we have to sacrifice comfort to vote for what's right‽ I mean we're not all nationalists or US exceptionalists, some of us are humanists or internationalists. While I think the question is asked in bad faith, I still have to answer it in order not to concede or lose the debate.
September 3, 2026
In 2024 the Democrats and Republicans ran on seven key things, and states under their control had already enacted some of them, and you bitch about the government enacting them:
Either: "Make America Great Again" (a regressive slogan), or "What can be, unburdened by what has been" (also a regressive slogan, saying: free the present and future by returning to the past).
Either: "We pledge to you that we will root out the communists, Marxists, fascists, and the radical left thugs that live like vermin within the confines of our country that lie and steal and cheat on elections." (conflating communism and fascism and saying it must be fought) or “It is clear from John Kelly's words that Donald Trump is someone who, I quote, 'certainly falls into the general definition of fascist,'" (says fascism must be fought, calls Trump a fascist, and whole platform is centered around "Never Trump.")
Either: "Together, over the next few years, we're going to make our military stronger, tougher, faster, fiercer, and more powerful than it has ever been before," or "The strongest, most lethal fighting force in the world." (Both say they're going to increase military spending)
Either: "I will double the resources for the Department of Justice to track down transnational cartels, to take action to stop the flow of fentanyl into our country," (while the Nat. Guard was ordered by Hochul to police the NYC subway) or "If I thought things were getting out of control, I would have no problem using the military, per se. We have to have safety in our country. We have to have law and order in our country. And whichever gets us there. But I think the National Guard will do the job." (One says they're gonna make the police twice as strong, the other says they're gonna use military to strengthen the police)
Either: "I will take further action to keep the border closed between ports of entry. Those who cross our borders unlawfully will be apprehended, removed, and barred from reentering for five years," or "I will seal the border, stop the invasion of people pouring through our border, and send Joe Biden's illegal aliens back home where they belong." (Both are saying they're going to close the open access points on the border and deport illegals)
Either: "I will focus on cutting needless bureaucracy and unnecessary regulatory red tape, and encouraging innovative technologies, while protecting consumers and creating a stable business environment with consistent and transparent rules of the road," or "I will create a government efficiency commission tasked with conducting a complete financial and performance audit of the entire federal government, and making recommendations for drastic reforms. We need to do it. Can't go on the way we are now." (One says they're gonna deregulated which means cutting regulations enforcement spending and the other says they're gonna cut spend straight out).
Either: "Let me be clear, I will always stand up for Israel’s right to defend itself, and I will always ensure Israel has the ability to defend itself." or " (Trump) fully supports Israel's right to defend itself and eliminate the terrorist threat."Campaign spokesperson Karoline Leavitt (They both called genocide of a people without a standing military an act of defense)
From immigration, to law enforcement, to program cuts and deregulation, to foreign policy and military action, to supports genocide, the two parties literally told everybody, using different rhetoric, that they were going to get to the same destination. People are complaining about what the government is doing, and how elected officials of what is supposed to be the opposition party are acting bipartisan to help achieve those actions committed by the government. The difference in complaints from Dem and GOP voters is the speed at which our shackles are being tightened, not that we're being shackled by a system of government designed to keep us enslaved.
We told you the the parties were negligible, and you told us to stop taking your words literally, while you took the other party's words literally. We told you their policies harmed humanity as a whole, and you said you were apathetic to humanity's plight and only cared about Americans. Americans are not nor have they ever been more important than then humanity, especially those being genocided; American rights or comfort is not more important than the freedoms or rights to live of non Americans. We see things that are unacceptable as things that must be abolished, you see them as inevitable, we see things that must be enforced, you see those situations as nothing we can do. Because of that what we see as superficial differences, you call fundamental.
Defeatism leads to complicity not pragmatism, the fox is as dangerous as the wolf, vote third party or abstain and get organized; stop empowering the wage masters and overlords of the Uniparty and start paying attention to political theater and bad script writing. You are being tried in the court of public opinion since we the people, at the moment do not control the courts. Stop arguing against a weaker version of our position than the one we actually stated, and understand unlike you, we are not nationalists or US exceptionalists, we are internationalists and care about the world to where you care only about America. We will continue to point out your similarities and share the "I Told You SOs!"
September 2, 2026
I don't want to hear from Dem voters, especially my acquaintances, how bad Israel and the IDF is, or have them show me videos of Israel and the IDF being immoral species traitors, Dems had 15 months to stop it but were more concerned with staying at brunch and collecting AIPAC, Jstreet, and other Israeli money sources, and Dem voters were more concerned about staying comfortable and beating gop voters then not voting for genociders.
September 2, 2026
We've been calling for schools and universities to be made public for over 25 years. Democrats and their voters are worried about the GOP making everything private and the wealthy abusing private school vouchers. If private schools and universities were abolished and safeguards were put into place, they wouldn't be losing their minds, while Democratic politicians commit to the political theater script.
September 2, 2026
Both Dem and GOP voting acquaintances seem to think if there sources, that you're getting your information from Facebook or tabloid, misinformation sources. I'll share with them the WSWS, France24, New Arab, High North News, the South China Morning Post, Lee Camp, Will Talkz, or Sabby Sabs, to name a few and they'll send me shit like Dean Whithers, Mehdi Hasan, Tim Pool, or Greg Gutfeld, not realizing they're sending blue or red cult propaganda. But when I say something about it, they look like i'm speaking to foreign language.
September 2, 2026
When one has a strong conviction to their philosophical-ideological principles and thought, and they notice an epistemic and moral problem with not only the government and systems but organizations and population, how can one be expected not to be an activist-misanthrope under those material conditions and physical reality? This is why the science of psychology and psychiatry must be used in conjunction with dialectical materialism.
September 2, 2026
When one views protesting as pageantry, voting as a rarely working tool, mutual aid as a band-aid, and uprisings, riots, and revolt as necessary but not gonna happen in their lifetime, why is there objection to one only consuming headlines, video shorts, single posts, and tl;dr executive summaries if stuff, especially when one views, information is nothing that they can do with, and existing in the current population makes one slowly believe that the only purpose to existing is to trudge through life while consuming in producing finite resources?
September 2, 2026
Kyle Kulinsky said, "Americans truly haven’t reckoned with the fact that about 30% of the population in our country are the moral equivalent of nazis." Well, what kyles fails to add is: an additional 30% to 40% are either fascist or moderate fascists.
September 2, 2026
The difference between Iran's and Qatar's mentality, one finds peace in staying oppressed and the other finds it in the idea of being liberated from global oppressors.
September 2, 2026
Since Dem voters keep questioning why I hold voters accountable for the actions of their elected officials, which is ironic because they blame the GOP voters for Trump, Liberal Harvard Professor Eric Beerbohm wrote theory about voter ethics, he says you don't vote in complicity with injustice, instead you vote for the uncomfortable options. And although he is against abstaining, he implied that if the only options were to side with injustice, which a party committing genocide and one wanting to would qualify for the most extreme case, voters should abstaining and organise to uprise or revolt. Now pre election day, a few third parties had a path to 270, so the "uncomfortable," options were there but both dem and gop voters voted for comfortable genocide over uncomfortable genocide, claiming pragmatism while the left called it defeatism. Maybe one day they'll get moral redlines, and why some are irreconcilable once violated...And the how much blame falls to the voters, that depends on the severity of the actions done by the politicians and whether or whether or not there were just candidates running and whether or not they chose to vote for complicit candidates instead of taking alternative options and actions. I truly be in the saying, "we are whatvwe tolerate, guilty by association;" and they refuse to walk away from the status quo parties due to their conservative or conservative centrist/liberal/socialist philosophical- ideology.
September 2, 2026
Never forget: Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500° F, and steel loses structural integrity at 1000° F, structural meaning weight bearing, losing half its strength at 1100°. Per SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering. I need both unedited film and unredacted information before I'll believe the build was taken down by a demo team, regardless if I believe the government directly or indirectly brought the building down.
September 2, 2026
Insulting your political opposition's appearance is tribalism, and using imagery that has nothing to do with the subject to attack your opposition or make yourself look better, according to a G.H. Brenner MD DFAPA, is called BRODA. Stop fighting sectarian identity politics and start fighting for the working class or human species.
September 2, 2026
During Trump's first administration Dem voters were like, "you are what you tolerate, guilty by association," at Republicans, who would deny they weren't racist?Just because the party was. Then the Democrats start getting called out for doing shit on the list of points and traits they were sharing, and they got away from that stance under Biden. Now that Trump is president again, they're trying to be hypocritical and say only the gop are fascist, pedophiles, neo nazi supporters, and genocidal. Na-Nah! Your politicians are in the Epstein list, your parties backed genocide and neo nazis, your parties did fascist shit, and you stand by your parties. You don't stand with a party that doesn't fascist shit, set that has members accused of being pedos or predators, you don't stand by a party that has or supports nazis, and you don't stand with a party committing or supporting a genocide against a non nazi threat level to humanity. Regardless if it's an elected position or just a voter, affiliating with or supporting either the Dems or the GOP makes you what they are.
September 2, 2026
When advancements are discontinued, bought and either price raised or discontinued, or their inventors are unalived to prevent the advancements from getting out to the public, when it happens under your party's and governent's watch or they collect money from those who benefits it, and you still stand by and support them while calling out how advancements and their creators were handled, you are showing signs of having at least a momentary cognitive function issue, and should seek help.
September 2, 2026
The guy is evil but he went to get into the ethical side of that reasoning and the other guy said that was silly conversation, which is, whether something is silly doesn't determine if something is correct or not; comedians make hilarious jokes all the time that are factually correct statements, and the comedian still has those conversations. While I agree against non 1940s nazi level threats (i.e. the innocent, vulnerable, and defenseless) that it's evil and wrong, the conversation for why it's immoral and unethical needs to be had. A divided cannot be had and humanity cannot progress if it is not willing to engage in discussions over what is and what isn't moral or ethical with reasoning and logic to back up their argument. So i do think while the guy wqs correct about it being silly, he simultaneously conceded his position by refusing to give a real answer to it, instead he just offered an unserious nonchalant response and the other person was correct to call him on it and say the conversation is over because in the conversation or debate, the guy refused to give a logical and reasonable defense for his stance, running the risk of coming off haughty in the process. And yes, I believe violence is always the last option on the table and must be proportional in response to the opposition threat level.
September 2, 2026
If they're gonna make such arguments, counter arguments must be made to counter false consciousness instead of just calling arguments silly and expecting people to blindly agree because you're educated or are considered an expert in a field and said so. We watched and continue to watch for conversations, safeguards to be attempted, and real active opposition to be had, and not just a simple, 'if you just vote for our party, that's all that's needed to be done, our politicians can stay at brunch, legislating isn't actually needed."
September 2, 2026
So one question or statement I constantly get from communists is: "Communists say communism isn't about morals, but people see stuff all the time they disagree with and don't write political ideologies around that disagreement, so why do communist disagreements matter? Why does ending exploitation and oppression by capitalists matter? Why does seizing the means of production and making a more equal society matter? And before you say people should be treated better, that doesn't explain why it matters that people should be treated better, and people needing to be treated better doesn't explain why Marx wrote his ideology. Why does any of it matter to you, to communists? If it's not about morals, a sense of things being right or wrong, and feeling the need to prove it and show there's a better way, then what is the underlying reason for why it matters?" Now, I might not have it worded exactly as they say it, but it's damn near close to what they say verbatim. And yet I see communists online saying it's not about morals, it's scientific, and that moralizing communism will alienate people away from it. Well, if we're not doing it because we feel things are wrong and evidence shows there's a better way, better being a matter of opinion, then why the hell are we communists? I mean, all communists want the best for workers, the best for humanity, and I hope the best for the planet. I have no issue with people using science, reason, and logic to explain why communism makes sense, but the underlying reason communist principles and opposition to other philosophical-ideological thought matters, we should be able to honestly admit why it matters to us as individuals. Somewhere underneath the historical materialism we believe exploitation is bad, human suffering under preventable conditions is bad, class struggle is bad, and a world without it is better. Moral epistemology is the foundation of dialectical materialism and commu
Comments
Post a Comment